一项多中心回顾性研究:既往使用 Ramucirumab 对 Nivolumab 作为胃癌三线治疗方案疗效的临床意义:一项多中心回顾性研究

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs - Real World Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1007/s40801-024-00460-z
Yuka Obayashi, Shoichiro Hirata, Yoshiyasu Kono, Makoto Abe, Koji Miyahara, Masahiro Nakagawa, Michihiro Ishida, Yasuhiro Choda, Kenta Hamada, Masaya Iwamuro, Seiji Kawano, Yoshiro Kawahara, Motoyuki Otsuka
{"title":"一项多中心回顾性研究:既往使用 Ramucirumab 对 Nivolumab 作为胃癌三线治疗方案疗效的临床意义:一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Yuka Obayashi, Shoichiro Hirata, Yoshiyasu Kono, Makoto Abe, Koji Miyahara, Masahiro Nakagawa, Michihiro Ishida, Yasuhiro Choda, Kenta Hamada, Masaya Iwamuro, Seiji Kawano, Yoshiro Kawahara, Motoyuki Otsuka","doi":"10.1007/s40801-024-00460-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Because vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition has been suggested to improve immune cell function in the cancer microenvironment, we examined whether using ramucirumab (RAM) before nivolumab usage is more effective in advanced gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. We analyzed patients who received nivolumab monotherapy as the third-line regimen for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer between October 2017 and December 2022. They were divided into the RAM (RAM-treated) group and the non-RAM (non-treated) group according to the RAM usage in the second-line regimen. The primary outcome was to compare the overall survival after nivolumab administration in the third-line regimen between the RAM and non-RAM groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients were included in the present study: 42 patients in the RAM group and ten patients in the non-RAM group. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the RAM group than in the non-RAM group (8.5 months vs 6.9 months, p < 0.05). In the RAM group, patients without peritoneal metastasis had significantly better median overall survival than those with peritoneal metastasis (23.8 months vs 7.7 months, p = 0.0033). Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards analyses showed that the presence of peritoneal metastasis (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.0-5.7) alone was significantly associated with overall survival in the RAM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of RAM prior to nivolumab monotherapy may contribute to prolonged survival in patients with gastric cancer, especially those without peritoneal metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Significance of Prior Ramucirumab Use on the Effectiveness of Nivolumab as the Third-Line Regimen in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuka Obayashi, Shoichiro Hirata, Yoshiyasu Kono, Makoto Abe, Koji Miyahara, Masahiro Nakagawa, Michihiro Ishida, Yasuhiro Choda, Kenta Hamada, Masaya Iwamuro, Seiji Kawano, Yoshiro Kawahara, Motoyuki Otsuka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40801-024-00460-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Because vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition has been suggested to improve immune cell function in the cancer microenvironment, we examined whether using ramucirumab (RAM) before nivolumab usage is more effective in advanced gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. We analyzed patients who received nivolumab monotherapy as the third-line regimen for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer between October 2017 and December 2022. They were divided into the RAM (RAM-treated) group and the non-RAM (non-treated) group according to the RAM usage in the second-line regimen. The primary outcome was to compare the overall survival after nivolumab administration in the third-line regimen between the RAM and non-RAM groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients were included in the present study: 42 patients in the RAM group and ten patients in the non-RAM group. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the RAM group than in the non-RAM group (8.5 months vs 6.9 months, p < 0.05). In the RAM group, patients without peritoneal metastasis had significantly better median overall survival than those with peritoneal metastasis (23.8 months vs 7.7 months, p = 0.0033). Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards analyses showed that the presence of peritoneal metastasis (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.0-5.7) alone was significantly associated with overall survival in the RAM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of RAM prior to nivolumab monotherapy may contribute to prolonged survival in patients with gastric cancer, especially those without peritoneal metastasis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs - Real World Outcomes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs - Real World Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00460-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00460-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:由于血管内皮生长因子抑制剂被认为可以改善癌症微环境中的免疫细胞功能,我们研究了在使用尼伐单抗之前使用雷莫芦单抗(RAM)是否对晚期胃癌更有效:这是一项多中心回顾性观察研究。我们分析了2017年10月至2022年12月期间接受nivolumab单药治疗作为不可切除的晚期或复发性胃癌三线治疗方案的患者。根据二线方案中RAM的使用情况,将他们分为RAM(RAM治疗)组和非RAM(非治疗)组。主要结果是比较RAM组和非RAM组在三线方案中使用尼妥珠单抗后的总生存期:本研究共纳入 52 例患者:结果:本研究共纳入52名患者:RAM组42名,非RAM组10名。RAM 组的中位总生存期明显长于非 RAM 组(8.5 个月 vs 6.9 个月,P 结论:RAM 组的中位总生存期明显长于非 RAM 组(8.5 个月 vs 6.9 个月,P 结论):在接受 nivolumab 单药治疗前使用 RAM 可能有助于延长胃癌患者的生存期,尤其是那些没有腹膜转移的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Significance of Prior Ramucirumab Use on the Effectiveness of Nivolumab as the Third-Line Regimen in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Background and objective: Because vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition has been suggested to improve immune cell function in the cancer microenvironment, we examined whether using ramucirumab (RAM) before nivolumab usage is more effective in advanced gastric cancer.

Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. We analyzed patients who received nivolumab monotherapy as the third-line regimen for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer between October 2017 and December 2022. They were divided into the RAM (RAM-treated) group and the non-RAM (non-treated) group according to the RAM usage in the second-line regimen. The primary outcome was to compare the overall survival after nivolumab administration in the third-line regimen between the RAM and non-RAM groups.

Results: Fifty-two patients were included in the present study: 42 patients in the RAM group and ten patients in the non-RAM group. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the RAM group than in the non-RAM group (8.5 months vs 6.9 months, p < 0.05). In the RAM group, patients without peritoneal metastasis had significantly better median overall survival than those with peritoneal metastasis (23.8 months vs 7.7 months, p = 0.0033). Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards analyses showed that the presence of peritoneal metastasis (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.0-5.7) alone was significantly associated with overall survival in the RAM group.

Conclusions: The use of RAM prior to nivolumab monotherapy may contribute to prolonged survival in patients with gastric cancer, especially those without peritoneal metastasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit. Comparison of the Safety of Aspirin Monotherapy and Aspirin and P2Y12 Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Patients Post Coil Embolization During Admission: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database. US Clinical Practice Experience with Eculizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: Acute Clinical Events and Healthcare Resource Utilization. Clinical Significance of Prior Ramucirumab Use on the Effectiveness of Nivolumab as the Third-Line Regimen in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Early Clinical Outcomes of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparison with First-Line or Later-Line Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1