Melis Baykara Ulusan , Francesca Ferrara , Emine Meltem , Paola Clauser , Thomas H. Helbich , Pascal A.T. Baltzer
{"title":"纯磁共振成像乳腺癌的侵袭性低于传统成像可识别的癌症。","authors":"Melis Baykara Ulusan , Francesca Ferrara , Emine Meltem , Paola Clauser , Thomas H. Helbich , Pascal A.T. Baltzer","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a superior sensitivity for the diagnosis of breast cancer, leading to lesions primarily detected by MRI. Some of these lesions cannot be identified by targeted second-look ultrasound (SLUS) examinations and are thus referred to as MRI-only lesions. We hypothesize that biologically more aggressive cancers lead to more distinct tissue damage improving visibility on SLUS.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate whether there are differences in cancer subtypes between MRI-only and SLUS-detected malignant lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective single-center observational study evaluated 435 patients who received breast MRI examinations between January 2017 and December 2022, with at least one lesion primarily detected on MRI and histologically confirmed as malignant. Demographic characteristics, lesion type (mass or non-mass), MRI-assessed lesion size (mm), histological diagnosis, stage, immunohistochemical analysis (ER, PR, HER-2, Ki-67), and lymph node status were assessed and compared between MRI-only and SLUS-detected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 435 patients (mean age of 57.4 ± 13.3), 34.02 % (n = 148) were in the MRI-only group, while the remaining 65.98 % (n = 287) were identified by SLUS. MRI-only cases were significantly smaller in size (10 mm vs 20 mm), mostly staged as T1 (66.9 %) and showed features associated with less biological aggressiveness (higher pure ductal carcinoma in situ rates: 30.4 % vs 5.2 %; lower Ki-67, median values: 10 vs 20) compared to SLUS-detected cases (<em>P</em> < 0.001). SLUS-detected cancers had higher ratios of microscopic (4.9 % vs 3.4 %) and macroscopic axillary metastasis (26.8 % vs 7.4 %) compared to MRI-only lesions (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MRI-only lesions presented histologically and immunohistochemically with less aggressive patterns compared to those detected via SLUS.</div><div>Clinic Impact: Our data provide evidence that MRI-only lesions are biologically less aggressive and of lower stage, offering the potential of earlier treatment chance since they are visible on MRI before becoming more aggressive and destructive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI-only breast cancers are less aggressive than cancers identifiable on conventional imaging\",\"authors\":\"Melis Baykara Ulusan , Francesca Ferrara , Emine Meltem , Paola Clauser , Thomas H. Helbich , Pascal A.T. Baltzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a superior sensitivity for the diagnosis of breast cancer, leading to lesions primarily detected by MRI. Some of these lesions cannot be identified by targeted second-look ultrasound (SLUS) examinations and are thus referred to as MRI-only lesions. We hypothesize that biologically more aggressive cancers lead to more distinct tissue damage improving visibility on SLUS.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate whether there are differences in cancer subtypes between MRI-only and SLUS-detected malignant lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective single-center observational study evaluated 435 patients who received breast MRI examinations between January 2017 and December 2022, with at least one lesion primarily detected on MRI and histologically confirmed as malignant. Demographic characteristics, lesion type (mass or non-mass), MRI-assessed lesion size (mm), histological diagnosis, stage, immunohistochemical analysis (ER, PR, HER-2, Ki-67), and lymph node status were assessed and compared between MRI-only and SLUS-detected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 435 patients (mean age of 57.4 ± 13.3), 34.02 % (n = 148) were in the MRI-only group, while the remaining 65.98 % (n = 287) were identified by SLUS. MRI-only cases were significantly smaller in size (10 mm vs 20 mm), mostly staged as T1 (66.9 %) and showed features associated with less biological aggressiveness (higher pure ductal carcinoma in situ rates: 30.4 % vs 5.2 %; lower Ki-67, median values: 10 vs 20) compared to SLUS-detected cases (<em>P</em> < 0.001). SLUS-detected cancers had higher ratios of microscopic (4.9 % vs 3.4 %) and macroscopic axillary metastasis (26.8 % vs 7.4 %) compared to MRI-only lesions (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MRI-only lesions presented histologically and immunohistochemically with less aggressive patterns compared to those detected via SLUS.</div><div>Clinic Impact: Our data provide evidence that MRI-only lesions are biologically less aggressive and of lower stage, offering the potential of earlier treatment chance since they are visible on MRI before becoming more aggressive and destructive.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004972\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
MRI-only breast cancers are less aggressive than cancers identifiable on conventional imaging
Background
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a superior sensitivity for the diagnosis of breast cancer, leading to lesions primarily detected by MRI. Some of these lesions cannot be identified by targeted second-look ultrasound (SLUS) examinations and are thus referred to as MRI-only lesions. We hypothesize that biologically more aggressive cancers lead to more distinct tissue damage improving visibility on SLUS.
Objective
To investigate whether there are differences in cancer subtypes between MRI-only and SLUS-detected malignant lesions.
Methods
This retrospective single-center observational study evaluated 435 patients who received breast MRI examinations between January 2017 and December 2022, with at least one lesion primarily detected on MRI and histologically confirmed as malignant. Demographic characteristics, lesion type (mass or non-mass), MRI-assessed lesion size (mm), histological diagnosis, stage, immunohistochemical analysis (ER, PR, HER-2, Ki-67), and lymph node status were assessed and compared between MRI-only and SLUS-detected.
Results
Among 435 patients (mean age of 57.4 ± 13.3), 34.02 % (n = 148) were in the MRI-only group, while the remaining 65.98 % (n = 287) were identified by SLUS. MRI-only cases were significantly smaller in size (10 mm vs 20 mm), mostly staged as T1 (66.9 %) and showed features associated with less biological aggressiveness (higher pure ductal carcinoma in situ rates: 30.4 % vs 5.2 %; lower Ki-67, median values: 10 vs 20) compared to SLUS-detected cases (P < 0.001). SLUS-detected cancers had higher ratios of microscopic (4.9 % vs 3.4 %) and macroscopic axillary metastasis (26.8 % vs 7.4 %) compared to MRI-only lesions (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
MRI-only lesions presented histologically and immunohistochemically with less aggressive patterns compared to those detected via SLUS.
Clinic Impact: Our data provide evidence that MRI-only lesions are biologically less aggressive and of lower stage, offering the potential of earlier treatment chance since they are visible on MRI before becoming more aggressive and destructive.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.