沃尔巴克氏体加强了蜘蛛螨交配前和交配后早期隔离之间的匹配。

IF 3.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Evolution Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpae149
Miguel A Cruz, Sara Magalhães, Murat Bakırdöven, Flore Zélé
{"title":"沃尔巴克氏体加强了蜘蛛螨交配前和交配后早期隔离之间的匹配。","authors":"Miguel A Cruz, Sara Magalhães, Murat Bakırdöven, Flore Zélé","doi":"10.1093/evolut/qpae149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endosymbiotic reproductive manipulators are widely studied as sources of post-zygotic isolation in arthropods, but their effect on pre-zygotic isolation between genetically differentiated populations has garnered less attention. We tested this using two partially isolated populations of the red and green colour forms of Tetranychus urticae, either uninfected or infected with different Wolbachia strains, one inducing cytoplasmic incompatibility and the other not. We first investigated male and female preferences, and found that, in absence of infection, females were not choosy, but all males preferred red-form females. Wolbachia effects were more subtle, with only the CI-inducing strain slightly strengthening colour-form based preferences. We then performed a double-mating experiment to test how incompatible matings affect subsequent mating behaviour and offspring production, as compared to compatible matings. Females mated with an incompatible male (infected and/or heterotypic) were more attractive and/or receptive to subsequent (compatible) matings, although analyses of offspring production revealed no clear benefit for this re-mating behaviour (i.e., apparently unaltered first male sperm precedence). Finally, by computing the relative contributions of each reproductive barrier to total isolation, we showed that pre-mating isolation matches both host-associated and Wolbachia-induced post-mating isolation, suggesting that Wolbachia could contribute to reproductive isolation in this system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12082,"journal":{"name":"Evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wolbachia strengthens the match between pre-mating and early post-mating isolation in spider mites.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel A Cruz, Sara Magalhães, Murat Bakırdöven, Flore Zélé\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/evolut/qpae149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endosymbiotic reproductive manipulators are widely studied as sources of post-zygotic isolation in arthropods, but their effect on pre-zygotic isolation between genetically differentiated populations has garnered less attention. We tested this using two partially isolated populations of the red and green colour forms of Tetranychus urticae, either uninfected or infected with different Wolbachia strains, one inducing cytoplasmic incompatibility and the other not. We first investigated male and female preferences, and found that, in absence of infection, females were not choosy, but all males preferred red-form females. Wolbachia effects were more subtle, with only the CI-inducing strain slightly strengthening colour-form based preferences. We then performed a double-mating experiment to test how incompatible matings affect subsequent mating behaviour and offspring production, as compared to compatible matings. Females mated with an incompatible male (infected and/or heterotypic) were more attractive and/or receptive to subsequent (compatible) matings, although analyses of offspring production revealed no clear benefit for this re-mating behaviour (i.e., apparently unaltered first male sperm precedence). Finally, by computing the relative contributions of each reproductive barrier to total isolation, we showed that pre-mating isolation matches both host-associated and Wolbachia-induced post-mating isolation, suggesting that Wolbachia could contribute to reproductive isolation in this system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpae149\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpae149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内共生生殖操纵子作为节肢动物后同种异体隔离的来源被广泛研究,但它们对不同基因种群之间前同种异体隔离的影响却较少引起关注。我们使用两个部分隔离的红色和绿色四膜虫种群进行了测试,这两个种群要么未感染沃尔巴克氏体,要么感染了不同的沃尔巴克氏体菌株,其中一个会诱导细胞质不相容,另一个则不会。我们首先调查了雄虫和雌虫的偏好,发现在未感染的情况下,雌虫并不挑剔,但所有雄虫都偏好红色雌虫。沃尔巴克氏体的影响更为微妙,只有CI诱导株稍微加强了基于颜色形态的偏好。然后,我们进行了双交配实验,以检验与相容交配相比,不相容交配如何影响随后的交配行为和后代生产。与不相容雄性(受感染和/或异型)交配的雌性对后续(相容)交配更有吸引力和/或更容易接受,尽管对后代生产的分析表明这种再交配行为没有明显的益处(即第一雄性精子优先性显然没有改变)。最后,通过计算每种生殖障碍对总隔离的相对贡献,我们发现交配前的隔离与宿主相关隔离和沃尔巴克氏体诱导的交配后隔离相匹配,这表明沃尔巴克氏体可能有助于该系统中的生殖隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wolbachia strengthens the match between pre-mating and early post-mating isolation in spider mites.

Endosymbiotic reproductive manipulators are widely studied as sources of post-zygotic isolation in arthropods, but their effect on pre-zygotic isolation between genetically differentiated populations has garnered less attention. We tested this using two partially isolated populations of the red and green colour forms of Tetranychus urticae, either uninfected or infected with different Wolbachia strains, one inducing cytoplasmic incompatibility and the other not. We first investigated male and female preferences, and found that, in absence of infection, females were not choosy, but all males preferred red-form females. Wolbachia effects were more subtle, with only the CI-inducing strain slightly strengthening colour-form based preferences. We then performed a double-mating experiment to test how incompatible matings affect subsequent mating behaviour and offspring production, as compared to compatible matings. Females mated with an incompatible male (infected and/or heterotypic) were more attractive and/or receptive to subsequent (compatible) matings, although analyses of offspring production revealed no clear benefit for this re-mating behaviour (i.e., apparently unaltered first male sperm precedence). Finally, by computing the relative contributions of each reproductive barrier to total isolation, we showed that pre-mating isolation matches both host-associated and Wolbachia-induced post-mating isolation, suggesting that Wolbachia could contribute to reproductive isolation in this system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution
Evolution 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution, published for the Society for the Study of Evolution, is the premier publication devoted to the study of organic evolution and the integration of the various fields of science concerned with evolution. The journal presents significant and original results that extend our understanding of evolutionary phenomena and processes.
期刊最新文献
Correlated evolution of categorical characters under a simple model. Selection on sporulation strategies in a metapopulation can lead to coexistence. Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species. Brain-body co-evolution in incipient versus established primate species - evaluating Simpson's "most important distinction". Weak integration allows novel fin shapes and spurs locomotor diversity in reef fishes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1