Jessica Hartmann , Moritz Fritzenwanker , Can Imirzalioglu , Torsten Hain , Borros Michael Arneth , Florian Wagenlehner
{"title":"并发尿路感染的床旁检测:评估 Vivalytic One 尿路感染分析仪在护理点环境中检测泌尿科患者尿液样本中致病性细菌和抗菌药耐药性的能力。","authors":"Jessica Hartmann , Moritz Fritzenwanker , Can Imirzalioglu , Torsten Hain , Borros Michael Arneth , Florian Wagenlehner","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are some of the most encountered infections in clinical practice, exhibiting increasing antimicrobial resistance. Bacterial species identification and antimicrobial resistance testing at point of care (POCT) could improve adequate initial antibiotic therapy and antimicrobial stewardship. In this work, the Vivalytic UTI test, which represents a qualitative PCR-based microarray test, able to detect specific uropathogenic bacteria and associated antimicrobial resistance genes was evaluated at POCT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In September 2023, we used this point-of-care testing (POCT) to analyse 126 consecutive urine samples of patients with complicated UTI. Samples processed with the Vivalytic UTI POCT were preselected for the presence of bacteriuria by screening with urine flow cytometry (cut-off ≥70 bacteria per microlitre). We performed the POCT before and after sample transport, and compared the results to standard urine culture and antibiotic sensitivity tests according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Nineteen different bacterial species were detected. Sixteen species reached a diagnostic accuracy of ≥90.27% with negative predictive values of ≥93.67%. The POCT was able to detect bacterial species under the estimated concentration of 10<sup>4</sup>–5 × 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/ml. The concordant (Vivalytic vs. culture) antimicrobial resistance gene detection rate reached a higher accuracy after transport (≥84.15%) compared to POC-testing before transport (≥81.71%), except for Vancomycin. <em>Aerococcus urinae, Enterococcus hirae, Hafnia alvei</em>, and <em>Staphylococcus lugdunensis</em> are not part of the POCT test panel; these were detected by urine culture only in 19% of cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>The Vivalytic UTI POCT displayed high sensitivity and specificity in identifying uropathogenic bacteria and antibiotic resistance markers to be further evaluated in clinical practice. However, it would be helpful to expand the resistance to include information about more commonly used antibiotics like aminopenicillins, cephalosporines and fluoroquinolones.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this study, we tested 126 consecutive urine samples of urological patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) by using the Vivalytic UTI point-of-care testing before and after sample transport. We found out that the sample transport to some extent influences the pathogen and resistance detection rate of the Vivalytic UTI assay. Compared to standard-of-care diagnostics, pathogen identification was more accurate before sample transport, while the concordant antimicrobial resistance gene detection rate reached higher accuracy after transport.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":"10 5","pages":"Pages 734-741"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care Testing in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: Evaluation of the Vivalytic One Urinary Tract Infection Analyser for Detecting Uropathogenic Bacteria and Antimicrobial Resistance in Urine Samples of Urological Patients in a Point-of-care Setting\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Hartmann , Moritz Fritzenwanker , Can Imirzalioglu , Torsten Hain , Borros Michael Arneth , Florian Wagenlehner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are some of the most encountered infections in clinical practice, exhibiting increasing antimicrobial resistance. Bacterial species identification and antimicrobial resistance testing at point of care (POCT) could improve adequate initial antibiotic therapy and antimicrobial stewardship. In this work, the Vivalytic UTI test, which represents a qualitative PCR-based microarray test, able to detect specific uropathogenic bacteria and associated antimicrobial resistance genes was evaluated at POCT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In September 2023, we used this point-of-care testing (POCT) to analyse 126 consecutive urine samples of patients with complicated UTI. Samples processed with the Vivalytic UTI POCT were preselected for the presence of bacteriuria by screening with urine flow cytometry (cut-off ≥70 bacteria per microlitre). We performed the POCT before and after sample transport, and compared the results to standard urine culture and antibiotic sensitivity tests according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Nineteen different bacterial species were detected. Sixteen species reached a diagnostic accuracy of ≥90.27% with negative predictive values of ≥93.67%. The POCT was able to detect bacterial species under the estimated concentration of 10<sup>4</sup>–5 × 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/ml. The concordant (Vivalytic vs. culture) antimicrobial resistance gene detection rate reached a higher accuracy after transport (≥84.15%) compared to POC-testing before transport (≥81.71%), except for Vancomycin. <em>Aerococcus urinae, Enterococcus hirae, Hafnia alvei</em>, and <em>Staphylococcus lugdunensis</em> are not part of the POCT test panel; these were detected by urine culture only in 19% of cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>The Vivalytic UTI POCT displayed high sensitivity and specificity in identifying uropathogenic bacteria and antibiotic resistance markers to be further evaluated in clinical practice. However, it would be helpful to expand the resistance to include information about more commonly used antibiotics like aminopenicillins, cephalosporines and fluoroquinolones.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this study, we tested 126 consecutive urine samples of urological patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) by using the Vivalytic UTI point-of-care testing before and after sample transport. We found out that the sample transport to some extent influences the pathogen and resistance detection rate of the Vivalytic UTI assay. Compared to standard-of-care diagnostics, pathogen identification was more accurate before sample transport, while the concordant antimicrobial resistance gene detection rate reached higher accuracy after transport.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 734-741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240545692400186X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240545692400186X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:尿路感染(UTI)是临床实践中最常见的感染之一,抗菌药耐药性不断增加。在护理点(POCT)进行细菌种类鉴定和抗菌药耐药性检测可改善初始抗生素治疗和抗菌药管理。在这项工作中,我们对 Vivalytic UTI 检验进行了评估,该检验是一种基于 PCR 的定性微阵列检验,能够检测特定的尿路致病菌和相关的抗菌药耐药性基因:2023 年 9 月,我们使用这种护理点检测(POCT)分析了 126 份复杂性尿路感染患者的连续尿样。使用 Vivalytic UTI POCT 处理的样本通过尿液流式细胞术筛查(临界值≥每微升 70 个细菌)预选是否存在细菌尿。我们在样本运送前后进行了 POCT,并根据欧洲抗菌药敏感性测试委员会的要求将结果与标准尿培养和抗生素敏感性测试进行了比较:检测出 19 种不同的细菌。其中 16 种细菌的诊断准确率≥90.27%,阴性预测值≥93.67%。POCT 能够检测出估计浓度为 104-5 × 104 CFU/ml 的细菌种类。与运输前的 POC 检测(≥81.71%)相比,除万古霉素外,运输后抗菌药物耐药基因检测的一致性(Vivalytic 与培养)准确率更高(≥84.15%)。尿道气球菌、平滑肠球菌、白葡萄球菌和卢格杜恩葡萄球菌不在 POCT 检测范围内;仅在 19% 的病例中通过尿培养检测到了这些球菌:Vivalytic UTI POCT 在识别尿路致病菌和抗生素耐药性标记物方面显示出较高的灵敏度和特异性,有待在临床实践中进一步评估。患者总结:在本研究中,我们使用 Vivalytic UTI 床旁检测法检测了 126 份复杂性尿路感染(UTI)泌尿科患者的连续尿液样本,包括样本运送前后的尿液样本。我们发现,样本运输在一定程度上影响了 Vivalytic UTI 检测的病原体和耐药性检出率。与标准护理诊断相比,样本运送前的病原体鉴定更为准确,而运送后的抗菌药耐药性基因检出率则更高。
Point-of-care Testing in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: Evaluation of the Vivalytic One Urinary Tract Infection Analyser for Detecting Uropathogenic Bacteria and Antimicrobial Resistance in Urine Samples of Urological Patients in a Point-of-care Setting
Background and objective
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are some of the most encountered infections in clinical practice, exhibiting increasing antimicrobial resistance. Bacterial species identification and antimicrobial resistance testing at point of care (POCT) could improve adequate initial antibiotic therapy and antimicrobial stewardship. In this work, the Vivalytic UTI test, which represents a qualitative PCR-based microarray test, able to detect specific uropathogenic bacteria and associated antimicrobial resistance genes was evaluated at POCT.
Methods
In September 2023, we used this point-of-care testing (POCT) to analyse 126 consecutive urine samples of patients with complicated UTI. Samples processed with the Vivalytic UTI POCT were preselected for the presence of bacteriuria by screening with urine flow cytometry (cut-off ≥70 bacteria per microlitre). We performed the POCT before and after sample transport, and compared the results to standard urine culture and antibiotic sensitivity tests according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.
Key findings and limitations
Nineteen different bacterial species were detected. Sixteen species reached a diagnostic accuracy of ≥90.27% with negative predictive values of ≥93.67%. The POCT was able to detect bacterial species under the estimated concentration of 104–5 × 104 CFU/ml. The concordant (Vivalytic vs. culture) antimicrobial resistance gene detection rate reached a higher accuracy after transport (≥84.15%) compared to POC-testing before transport (≥81.71%), except for Vancomycin. Aerococcus urinae, Enterococcus hirae, Hafnia alvei, and Staphylococcus lugdunensis are not part of the POCT test panel; these were detected by urine culture only in 19% of cases.
Conclusions and clinical implications
The Vivalytic UTI POCT displayed high sensitivity and specificity in identifying uropathogenic bacteria and antibiotic resistance markers to be further evaluated in clinical practice. However, it would be helpful to expand the resistance to include information about more commonly used antibiotics like aminopenicillins, cephalosporines and fluoroquinolones.
Patient summary
In this study, we tested 126 consecutive urine samples of urological patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) by using the Vivalytic UTI point-of-care testing before and after sample transport. We found out that the sample transport to some extent influences the pathogen and resistance detection rate of the Vivalytic UTI assay. Compared to standard-of-care diagnostics, pathogen identification was more accurate before sample transport, while the concordant antimicrobial resistance gene detection rate reached higher accuracy after transport.
期刊介绍:
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.