Ying Zhou, Na Li, Guowei Ma, Ning Su, Jiang Liu, Wenxi Yue, Rui Yin, Jie Chen
{"title":"基于 FAERS 数据库挖掘和分析凡德他尼的不良事件信号。","authors":"Ying Zhou, Na Li, Guowei Ma, Ning Su, Jiang Liu, Wenxi Yue, Rui Yin, Jie Chen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2418326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>By analyzing the signal mining of vandetanib AEs, it provides a reference for the rational clinical use of the drug.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study provides signal detection and analysis of AEs associated with vandetanib using the FAERS from Q2 2011 to Q1 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disproportionality analyses were conducted using the ROR and the MHRA method, with AEs categorized and described based on SOC and PT from the MedDRA. A total of 1,721 AEs reports identified vandetanib as the primary suspect. The analyses yielded 187 AEs signals across 20 SOCs categories, with 47 signals not previously reported in the vandetanib labeling. Additionally, the study analyzes factors influencing AEs. The results are as follows: There are significant differences in Investigations based on gender and nationality (<i>p</i> < 0.05); skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and gastrointestinal disorders exhibit differences based on gender, age, and nationality (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Common AEs signals identified align with those documented in the drug labeling. However, AEs such as tumor lysis syndrome, skin discoloration, and pigmentary disorders, which are not listed in the labeling, warrant special attention. It is essential that abnormalities in patients' skin and laboratory indicators are closely monitored and addressed promptly to safeguard medication safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mining and analysis of adverse event signals of vandetanib based on the FAERS database.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Zhou, Na Li, Guowei Ma, Ning Su, Jiang Liu, Wenxi Yue, Rui Yin, Jie Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2418326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>By analyzing the signal mining of vandetanib AEs, it provides a reference for the rational clinical use of the drug.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study provides signal detection and analysis of AEs associated with vandetanib using the FAERS from Q2 2011 to Q1 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disproportionality analyses were conducted using the ROR and the MHRA method, with AEs categorized and described based on SOC and PT from the MedDRA. A total of 1,721 AEs reports identified vandetanib as the primary suspect. The analyses yielded 187 AEs signals across 20 SOCs categories, with 47 signals not previously reported in the vandetanib labeling. Additionally, the study analyzes factors influencing AEs. The results are as follows: There are significant differences in Investigations based on gender and nationality (<i>p</i> < 0.05); skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and gastrointestinal disorders exhibit differences based on gender, age, and nationality (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Common AEs signals identified align with those documented in the drug labeling. However, AEs such as tumor lysis syndrome, skin discoloration, and pigmentary disorders, which are not listed in the labeling, warrant special attention. It is essential that abnormalities in patients' skin and laboratory indicators are closely monitored and addressed promptly to safeguard medication safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2418326\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2418326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mining and analysis of adverse event signals of vandetanib based on the FAERS database.
Objective: By analyzing the signal mining of vandetanib AEs, it provides a reference for the rational clinical use of the drug.
Methods: This study provides signal detection and analysis of AEs associated with vandetanib using the FAERS from Q2 2011 to Q1 2023.
Results: Disproportionality analyses were conducted using the ROR and the MHRA method, with AEs categorized and described based on SOC and PT from the MedDRA. A total of 1,721 AEs reports identified vandetanib as the primary suspect. The analyses yielded 187 AEs signals across 20 SOCs categories, with 47 signals not previously reported in the vandetanib labeling. Additionally, the study analyzes factors influencing AEs. The results are as follows: There are significant differences in Investigations based on gender and nationality (p < 0.05); skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and gastrointestinal disorders exhibit differences based on gender, age, and nationality (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Common AEs signals identified align with those documented in the drug labeling. However, AEs such as tumor lysis syndrome, skin discoloration, and pigmentary disorders, which are not listed in the labeling, warrant special attention. It is essential that abnormalities in patients' skin and laboratory indicators are closely monitored and addressed promptly to safeguard medication safety.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.