采用集中式 HTA 流程的医疗系统从批准到提出报销建议所需的时间。重点关注波兰的 HTA 机构。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1080/14737167.2024.2416240
Aneta Mela, Andrzej Tysarowski, Elżbieta Rdzanek, Tomasz Blicharski, Janusz Jaroszyński, Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk, Karina Jahnz-Różyk, Maciej Niewada
{"title":"采用集中式 HTA 流程的医疗系统从批准到提出报销建议所需的时间。重点关注波兰的 HTA 机构。","authors":"Aneta Mela, Andrzej Tysarowski, Elżbieta Rdzanek, Tomasz Blicharski, Janusz Jaroszyński, Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk, Karina Jahnz-Różyk, Maciej Niewada","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2416240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To analyze the time from drug registration to reimbursement recommendations, we examined medicinal products, including new clinical indications, registered by the EMA between 2014 and 2019 across various therapeutic areas.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariffication (AOTMiT) was compared with 11 agencies in England, Wales, Ireland, Scotland, the Netherlands, Norway, France, Germany, New Zealand, Canada, Australia. A total of 1,942 recommendations published by 12 HTA agencies were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time from registration to recommendation in Poland was statistically significantly longer than for the other countries. The analysis revealed noticeable differences in the time it takes from drug registration to recommendation across the countries included in this analysis. Analyzing trends from 2014 to 2019 across individual countries, there appears to be a slight tendency toward a decrease in the median time from registration to recommendation in many agencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This may suggest improvements in the processes of the recommending authorities and the companies responsible for providing data for assessment. Despite Poland having one of the longest times from registration to recommendation among the countries analyzed, there has been a clear year-over-year decrease in the time to publication of reimbursement recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time from approval to reimbursement recommendations in healthcare systems with centralized HTA processes. Focus on the Polish HTA agency.\",\"authors\":\"Aneta Mela, Andrzej Tysarowski, Elżbieta Rdzanek, Tomasz Blicharski, Janusz Jaroszyński, Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk, Karina Jahnz-Różyk, Maciej Niewada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2024.2416240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To analyze the time from drug registration to reimbursement recommendations, we examined medicinal products, including new clinical indications, registered by the EMA between 2014 and 2019 across various therapeutic areas.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariffication (AOTMiT) was compared with 11 agencies in England, Wales, Ireland, Scotland, the Netherlands, Norway, France, Germany, New Zealand, Canada, Australia. A total of 1,942 recommendations published by 12 HTA agencies were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time from registration to recommendation in Poland was statistically significantly longer than for the other countries. The analysis revealed noticeable differences in the time it takes from drug registration to recommendation across the countries included in this analysis. Analyzing trends from 2014 to 2019 across individual countries, there appears to be a slight tendency toward a decrease in the median time from registration to recommendation in many agencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This may suggest improvements in the processes of the recommending authorities and the companies responsible for providing data for assessment. Despite Poland having one of the longest times from registration to recommendation among the countries analyzed, there has been a clear year-over-year decrease in the time to publication of reimbursement recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2416240\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2416240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了分析从药品注册到提出报销建议的时间,我们研究了2014年至2019年期间EMA在不同治疗领域注册的医药产品,包括新的临床适应症:我们将波兰卫生技术评估和关税局(AOTMiT)与英格兰、威尔士、爱尔兰、苏格兰、荷兰、挪威、法国、德国、新西兰、加拿大和澳大利亚的11个机构进行了比较。结果显示,波兰从注册到推荐所需的时间较长:结果:从统计角度看,波兰从注册到提出建议的时间明显长于其他国家。分析结果表明,从药品注册到获得推荐所需的时间在分析对象国之间存在明显差异。分析各个国家从 2014 年到 2019 年的趋势,值得注意的是,大多数机构从注册到推荐的中位时间都在下降:这可能表明推荐机构和负责提供评估数据的公司的流程有所改进。尽管波兰是所分析国家中从注册到推荐时间最长的国家之一,但报销建议的发布时间明显逐年缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time from approval to reimbursement recommendations in healthcare systems with centralized HTA processes. Focus on the Polish HTA agency.

Background: To analyze the time from drug registration to reimbursement recommendations, we examined medicinal products, including new clinical indications, registered by the EMA between 2014 and 2019 across various therapeutic areas.

Materials and methods: The Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariffication (AOTMiT) was compared with 11 agencies in England, Wales, Ireland, Scotland, the Netherlands, Norway, France, Germany, New Zealand, Canada, Australia. A total of 1,942 recommendations published by 12 HTA agencies were analyzed.

Results: The time from registration to recommendation in Poland was statistically significantly longer than for the other countries. The analysis revealed noticeable differences in the time it takes from drug registration to recommendation across the countries included in this analysis. Analyzing trends from 2014 to 2019 across individual countries, there appears to be a slight tendency toward a decrease in the median time from registration to recommendation in many agencies.

Conclusions: This may suggest improvements in the processes of the recommending authorities and the companies responsible for providing data for assessment. Despite Poland having one of the longest times from registration to recommendation among the countries analyzed, there has been a clear year-over-year decrease in the time to publication of reimbursement recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Secondary healthcare resource utilization and related costs associated with influenza-related hospital admissions in adult patients, England 2016 - 2020. Costs for global guideline-based diagnosis of mucormycosis in patients with neutropenia, hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation - a perspective of the German healthcare system. Content and cost of waste pharmaceuticals collected by pharmacies for disposal. Correction. Cost-effectiveness analysis of lorlatinib and crizotinib in the first-line treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1