南非捐献机构网站上卵细胞捐献者信息的质量:内容分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human Fertility Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531
Karin Hammarberg, Florence Hui-Min Yang, Cal Volks, Andrea Whittaker
{"title":"南非捐献机构网站上卵细胞捐献者信息的质量:内容分析。","authors":"Karin Hammarberg, Florence Hui-Min Yang, Cal Volks, Andrea Whittaker","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive travel for gamete donation is becoming increasingly common. South Africa is renowned for its availability and relative affordability of high-quality assisted reproductive technology (ART) services. In South Africa (SA) gamete donation is anonymous by law and donors are compensated. Due to its significant availability of donors, SA is a popular destination for people who need donor gametes. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of information for oocyte donors available on donor agency websites in SA. A Google search was performed to compile a list of oocyte donor agency websites and content analysis was used to assess the comprehensiveness of the information for donors. Information on 12 websites was analysed. Overall, wording suggested that oocyte donation is a safe and easy procedure which is a process worth experiencing. Possible physical risks and psychological implications of donating oocytes were either not mentioned or downplayed. No website mentioned if or how donors would be followed up after oocyte retrieval or how they would be cared for in case of complications. No website informed donors about the possibility of genetic testing revealing their identity to a child born from their donation. The lack of transparency about the psychological implications and potential risks of donating oocytes suggests that women who contemplate donating oocytes in SA may not have the information they need to make informed decisions about whether to proceed. Since donor agency websites are potential donors' primary source of information, they should provide comprehensive information about all aspects of oocyte donation. This should include transparent and comprehensive information about the known physical and psychological risks. Donors also need to know that oocyte donation may have unknown long-term health risks and that direct-to-consumer genetic testing may reveal their identity to children conceived through their donation in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Karin Hammarberg, Florence Hui-Min Yang, Cal Volks, Andrea Whittaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reproductive travel for gamete donation is becoming increasingly common. South Africa is renowned for its availability and relative affordability of high-quality assisted reproductive technology (ART) services. In South Africa (SA) gamete donation is anonymous by law and donors are compensated. Due to its significant availability of donors, SA is a popular destination for people who need donor gametes. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of information for oocyte donors available on donor agency websites in SA. A Google search was performed to compile a list of oocyte donor agency websites and content analysis was used to assess the comprehensiveness of the information for donors. Information on 12 websites was analysed. Overall, wording suggested that oocyte donation is a safe and easy procedure which is a process worth experiencing. Possible physical risks and psychological implications of donating oocytes were either not mentioned or downplayed. No website mentioned if or how donors would be followed up after oocyte retrieval or how they would be cared for in case of complications. No website informed donors about the possibility of genetic testing revealing their identity to a child born from their donation. The lack of transparency about the psychological implications and potential risks of donating oocytes suggests that women who contemplate donating oocytes in SA may not have the information they need to make informed decisions about whether to proceed. Since donor agency websites are potential donors' primary source of information, they should provide comprehensive information about all aspects of oocyte donation. This should include transparent and comprehensive information about the known physical and psychological risks. Donors also need to know that oocyte donation may have unknown long-term health risks and that direct-to-consumer genetic testing may reveal their identity to children conceived through their donation in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Fertility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Fertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为捐献配子而进行的生殖旅行越来越普遍。南非以其高质量辅助生殖技术服务的可获得性和相对可负担性而闻名。在南非,法律规定配子捐献是匿名的,捐献者可获得补偿。由于有大量的捐献者,南非成为需要捐献配子者的首选目的地。本研究旨在评估南非捐献机构网站上卵细胞捐献者信息的质量和全面性。研究人员通过谷歌搜索编制了一份卵细胞捐献机构网站清单,并使用内容分析法对捐献者信息的全面性进行了评估。对 12 个网站的信息进行了分析。总体而言,相关措辞表明,卵母细胞捐献是一个安全、简便的程序,是一个值得体验的过程。对于捐献卵细胞可能带来的身体风险和心理影响,要么只字未提,要么轻描淡写。没有一个网站提到在卵母细胞提取后是否或如何对捐献者进行跟踪,或在出现并发症时如何照顾捐献者。没有任何网站告知捐献者,基因检测可能会暴露他们捐献后所生孩子的身份。有关捐献卵细胞的心理影响和潜在风险缺乏透明度,这表明考虑在南澳大利亚捐献卵细胞的妇女可能无法获得所需的信息,从而在知情的情况下决定是否继续捐献。由于捐献机构网站是潜在捐献者的主要信息来源,它们应提供有关卵细胞捐献各个方面的全面信息。其中应包括有关已知生理和心理风险的透明而全面的信息。捐献者还需要知道,卵细胞捐献可能会带来未知的长期健康风险,而且直接面向消费者的基因检测可能会在将来向通过其捐献而受孕的孩子透露他们的身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis.

Reproductive travel for gamete donation is becoming increasingly common. South Africa is renowned for its availability and relative affordability of high-quality assisted reproductive technology (ART) services. In South Africa (SA) gamete donation is anonymous by law and donors are compensated. Due to its significant availability of donors, SA is a popular destination for people who need donor gametes. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of information for oocyte donors available on donor agency websites in SA. A Google search was performed to compile a list of oocyte donor agency websites and content analysis was used to assess the comprehensiveness of the information for donors. Information on 12 websites was analysed. Overall, wording suggested that oocyte donation is a safe and easy procedure which is a process worth experiencing. Possible physical risks and psychological implications of donating oocytes were either not mentioned or downplayed. No website mentioned if or how donors would be followed up after oocyte retrieval or how they would be cared for in case of complications. No website informed donors about the possibility of genetic testing revealing their identity to a child born from their donation. The lack of transparency about the psychological implications and potential risks of donating oocytes suggests that women who contemplate donating oocytes in SA may not have the information they need to make informed decisions about whether to proceed. Since donor agency websites are potential donors' primary source of information, they should provide comprehensive information about all aspects of oocyte donation. This should include transparent and comprehensive information about the known physical and psychological risks. Donors also need to know that oocyte donation may have unknown long-term health risks and that direct-to-consumer genetic testing may reveal their identity to children conceived through their donation in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
期刊最新文献
Do sperm and lubricants gel well with each other? A systematic review. Best practice recommendations for medically assisted reproduction in patients with known cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Effect of paternal body mass index on maternal and child-health outcomes of singletons after frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective study. Evidence based management of patients with endometriosis undergoing assisted conception: British fertility society policy and practice recommendations. Characterising umbilical abdominal wall endometriosis as a distinct subgroup of abdominal wall endometriosis - retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1