在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中检测手术边缘阳性的激光SAFE技术的准确性:盲法评估和评分者间一致性分析。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Histopathology Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1111/his.15336
Ricardo Almeida-Magana, Matthew Au, Tarek Al-Hammouri, Manju Mathew, Kate Dinneen, Larissa S T Mendes, Eoin Dinneen, Willem Vreuls, Greg Shaw, Alex Freeman, Aiman Haider
{"title":"在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中检测手术边缘阳性的激光SAFE技术的准确性:盲法评估和评分者间一致性分析。","authors":"Ricardo Almeida-Magana, Matthew Au, Tarek Al-Hammouri, Manju Mathew, Kate Dinneen, Larissa S T Mendes, Eoin Dinneen, Willem Vreuls, Greg Shaw, Alex Freeman, Aiman Haider","doi":"10.1111/his.15336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a new imaging modality capable of generating digital microscopic resolution scans of fresh surgical specimens, and holds potential as an alternative to frozen section (FS) analysis for intra-operative assessment of surgical margins. Previously, we described the LaserSAFE technique as an application of FCM for margin assessment in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Histolog® scanner. This study describes the accuracy and inter-rater agreement of FCM imaging compared to corresponding paraffin-embedded analysis (PA) among four blinded pathologists for the presence of positive surgical margins (PSM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RARP specimens from patients enrolled in the control arm of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study (NCT03317990) were analysed from April 2022 to February 2023. Prostate specimens were imaged using the Histolog® scanner before formalin fixation and PA. Four trained assessors, blinded to PA, reviewed and analysed FCM images of the posterolateral prostatic surface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 prostate specimens were included in the study. PA per lateral side of the prostate identified 11 instances of positive margins. Among the four histopathologists included in our study, FCM achieved a sensitivity of 73-91 and specificity of 94-100% for the presence of PSM. Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater agreement on PSM was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.64-0.92), indicating substantial agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This blinded analysis of FCM versus PA among histopathologists with different experience levels demonstrated high accuracy and substantial inter-rater agreement for diagnosing PSM. This supports the role of the FCM as an alternative to FS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of the LaserSAFE technique for detecting positive surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: blind assessment and inter-rater agreement analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Almeida-Magana, Matthew Au, Tarek Al-Hammouri, Manju Mathew, Kate Dinneen, Larissa S T Mendes, Eoin Dinneen, Willem Vreuls, Greg Shaw, Alex Freeman, Aiman Haider\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/his.15336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a new imaging modality capable of generating digital microscopic resolution scans of fresh surgical specimens, and holds potential as an alternative to frozen section (FS) analysis for intra-operative assessment of surgical margins. Previously, we described the LaserSAFE technique as an application of FCM for margin assessment in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Histolog® scanner. This study describes the accuracy and inter-rater agreement of FCM imaging compared to corresponding paraffin-embedded analysis (PA) among four blinded pathologists for the presence of positive surgical margins (PSM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RARP specimens from patients enrolled in the control arm of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study (NCT03317990) were analysed from April 2022 to February 2023. Prostate specimens were imaged using the Histolog® scanner before formalin fixation and PA. Four trained assessors, blinded to PA, reviewed and analysed FCM images of the posterolateral prostatic surface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 prostate specimens were included in the study. PA per lateral side of the prostate identified 11 instances of positive margins. Among the four histopathologists included in our study, FCM achieved a sensitivity of 73-91 and specificity of 94-100% for the presence of PSM. Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater agreement on PSM was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.64-0.92), indicating substantial agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This blinded analysis of FCM versus PA among histopathologists with different experience levels demonstrated high accuracy and substantial inter-rater agreement for diagnosing PSM. This supports the role of the FCM as an alternative to FS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15336\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介和目标:荧光共聚焦显微镜(FCM)是一种新的成像模式,能够生成新鲜手术标本的数字显微分辨率扫描,具有替代冷冻切片(FS)分析进行术中手术边缘评估的潜力。在此之前,我们曾介绍过 LaserSAFE 技术,该技术是 FCM 在机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术 (RARP) 中应用 Histolog® 扫描仪进行边缘评估的一种方法。本研究介绍了 FCM 成像与相应的石蜡包埋分析(PA)相比,四位盲法病理学家对手术切缘阳性(PSM)存在的准确性和评定者之间的一致性:从 2022 年 4 月到 2023 年 2 月,对 NeuroSAFE PROOF 研究(NCT03317990)对照组入组患者的 RARP 标本进行了分析。前列腺标本在福尔马林固定和 PA 前使用 Histolog® 扫描仪成像。四名训练有素的评估员对 PA 一无所知,他们审查并分析了前列腺后外侧表面的 FCM 图像:共有 31 份前列腺标本被纳入研究。前列腺每侧的 PA 发现了 11 例阳性边缘。在参与研究的四位组织病理学家中,FCM 对是否存在 PSM 的灵敏度为 73-91,特异度为 94-100%。关于 PSM 的评分者间一致性的 Fleiss' Kappa 为 0.78(95% 置信区间 = 0.64-0.92),表明评分者间的一致性非常高:这项由具有不同经验水平的组织病理学家进行的 FCM 与 PA 的盲法分析表明,诊断 PSM 的准确性很高,且评分者之间的一致性很高。这支持了 FCM 替代 FS 的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of the LaserSAFE technique for detecting positive surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: blind assessment and inter-rater agreement analysis.

Introduction and objectives: Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a new imaging modality capable of generating digital microscopic resolution scans of fresh surgical specimens, and holds potential as an alternative to frozen section (FS) analysis for intra-operative assessment of surgical margins. Previously, we described the LaserSAFE technique as an application of FCM for margin assessment in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Histolog® scanner. This study describes the accuracy and inter-rater agreement of FCM imaging compared to corresponding paraffin-embedded analysis (PA) among four blinded pathologists for the presence of positive surgical margins (PSM).

Materials and methods: RARP specimens from patients enrolled in the control arm of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study (NCT03317990) were analysed from April 2022 to February 2023. Prostate specimens were imaged using the Histolog® scanner before formalin fixation and PA. Four trained assessors, blinded to PA, reviewed and analysed FCM images of the posterolateral prostatic surface.

Results: A total of 31 prostate specimens were included in the study. PA per lateral side of the prostate identified 11 instances of positive margins. Among the four histopathologists included in our study, FCM achieved a sensitivity of 73-91 and specificity of 94-100% for the presence of PSM. Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater agreement on PSM was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.64-0.92), indicating substantial agreement.

Conclusion: This blinded analysis of FCM versus PA among histopathologists with different experience levels demonstrated high accuracy and substantial inter-rater agreement for diagnosing PSM. This supports the role of the FCM as an alternative to FS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Histopathology
Histopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
239
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Histopathology is an international journal intended to be of practical value to surgical and diagnostic histopathologists, and to investigators of human disease who employ histopathological methods. Our primary purpose is to publish advances in pathology, in particular those applicable to clinical practice and contributing to the better understanding of human disease.
期刊最新文献
Evolution of morphological changes in donor livers undergoing normothermic machine perfusion. Recurrent GRHL fusions in a subset of sebaceoma: microscopic and molecular characterisation of eight cases. Sinonasal adenosquamous carcinomas arising in seromucinous hamartoma or respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma with atypical features: Report of five detailed clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of rare entity. Can patient ancestry influence molecular classifications in myeloid neoplasms? Dedicated diagnostic approaches for mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas occurring in children, adolescents, and young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1