美国患有痴呆症和轻度认知障碍的老年人的社会隔离和医疗保健使用情况。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-09-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae081
Mairead M Bartley, Jennifer L St Sauver, Darrell R Schroeder, Nandita Khera, Joan M Griffin
{"title":"美国患有痴呆症和轻度认知障碍的老年人的社会隔离和医疗保健使用情况。","authors":"Mairead M Bartley, Jennifer L St Sauver, Darrell R Schroeder, Nandita Khera, Joan M Griffin","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Social isolation is commonly experienced by older people and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Little is known about the influence of social isolation on the risk of acute care utilization among people living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Our objective was to investigate the impact of social isolation on the risk of death, hospitalization, and emergency department (ED) use among people living with MCI or dementia who are followed in our Community Internal Medicine practice at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We included people living with MCI or dementia, 55 years and older, who had a clinic visit between June 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021, and who had completed questions about social connections. The risk of death, hospitalization, and ED use was examined by levels of social connection (socially isolated, moderately isolated, moderately integrated, or socially integrated).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,320 people included (1,010 with MCI and 1,310 with dementia), 455 (19.6%) were classified as socially isolated and 591 (25.5%) were moderately isolated. Compared with those who were socially integrated, people who were socially isolated were at higher risk of death, hospitalization, and ED visits (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Social isolation is associated with an increased risk of acute health care utilization and death in people living with MCI or dementia. Interventions to address social isolation in this population are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Isolation and Healthcare Utilization in Older Adults Living With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Mairead M Bartley, Jennifer L St Sauver, Darrell R Schroeder, Nandita Khera, Joan M Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Social isolation is commonly experienced by older people and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Little is known about the influence of social isolation on the risk of acute care utilization among people living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Our objective was to investigate the impact of social isolation on the risk of death, hospitalization, and emergency department (ED) use among people living with MCI or dementia who are followed in our Community Internal Medicine practice at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We included people living with MCI or dementia, 55 years and older, who had a clinic visit between June 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021, and who had completed questions about social connections. The risk of death, hospitalization, and ED use was examined by levels of social connection (socially isolated, moderately isolated, moderately integrated, or socially integrated).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,320 people included (1,010 with MCI and 1,310 with dementia), 455 (19.6%) were classified as socially isolated and 591 (25.5%) were moderately isolated. Compared with those who were socially integrated, people who were socially isolated were at higher risk of death, hospitalization, and ED visits (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Social isolation is associated with an increased risk of acute health care utilization and death in people living with MCI or dementia. Interventions to address social isolation in this population are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489869/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae081\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:社会隔离是老年人的普遍经历,并与不良健康后果相关。人们对社会隔离对轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆症患者使用急症护理风险的影响知之甚少。我们的目的是调查社会隔离对明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所社区内科随访的 MCI 或痴呆症患者的死亡、住院和急诊使用风险的影响:我们纳入了年龄在 55 岁及以上、在 2019 年 6 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间接受过门诊就诊并填写了社会关系相关问题的 MCI 或痴呆症患者。根据社会联系水平(社会孤立、中度孤立、中度融合或社会融合)对死亡、住院和使用急诊室的风险进行了研究:在纳入的 2320 人中(1010 人患有 MCI,1310 人患有痴呆症),455 人(19.6%)被归类为社会孤立,591 人(25.5%)被归类为中度孤立。与融入社会的人相比,被社会孤立的人死亡、住院和去急诊室就诊的风险更高(讨论与启示):社会隔离与 MCI 或痴呆患者使用急性医疗服务和死亡风险的增加有关。需要采取干预措施来解决这一人群的社会隔离问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Isolation and Healthcare Utilization in Older Adults Living With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in the United States.

Background and objectives: Social isolation is commonly experienced by older people and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Little is known about the influence of social isolation on the risk of acute care utilization among people living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Our objective was to investigate the impact of social isolation on the risk of death, hospitalization, and emergency department (ED) use among people living with MCI or dementia who are followed in our Community Internal Medicine practice at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Research design and methods: We included people living with MCI or dementia, 55 years and older, who had a clinic visit between June 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021, and who had completed questions about social connections. The risk of death, hospitalization, and ED use was examined by levels of social connection (socially isolated, moderately isolated, moderately integrated, or socially integrated).

Results: Of 2,320 people included (1,010 with MCI and 1,310 with dementia), 455 (19.6%) were classified as socially isolated and 591 (25.5%) were moderately isolated. Compared with those who were socially integrated, people who were socially isolated were at higher risk of death, hospitalization, and ED visits (p < .001).

Discussion and implications: Social isolation is associated with an increased risk of acute health care utilization and death in people living with MCI or dementia. Interventions to address social isolation in this population are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Social Interaction Intervention on Cognitive Functions Among Older Adults Without Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Association Between Social Isolation and Incident Dementia Among Older Adults: Evidence From National Health and Aging Trend Study. Understanding the Prevalence and Risk Factor Profile of Olfactory Impairment and Its Impact on Patient Health Indicators and Economic Outcomes in Community-Dwelling Older Asian Adults. Examining Care Network Characteristics in Older Adults' Relocation to Residential Care Settings. Fifty Years of NIA Research: A New Journal's Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1