中国 0-6 岁儿童家长预防道路交通伤害健康素养量表的开发与验证。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1136/ip-2023-045080
Xiaohong Li, Miaomiao Chen, Yuheng Feng, Xueqi Ma, Jicui Zheng, Hanlin Shen, Jingwei Xia, Kaiyue Chen, Ying Guo, Qianghua Xia, Yu Jiang, Jun Lu, Fengshui Chang
{"title":"中国 0-6 岁儿童家长预防道路交通伤害健康素养量表的开发与验证。","authors":"Xiaohong Li, Miaomiao Chen, Yuheng Feng, Xueqi Ma, Jicui Zheng, Hanlin Shen, Jingwei Xia, Kaiyue Chen, Ying Guo, Qianghua Xia, Yu Jiang, Jun Lu, Fengshui Chang","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death in children. Parents' health literacy (HL) is closely related to child safety, especially for the young children. This study aimed to develop an intervention-oriented parent HL scale: Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries (PHLS-PRTIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed the scale including four parts: (1) definition and conceptualisation of PHLS-PRTIs; (2) domain and item development; (3) instrument construction; and (4) psychometric property validation. 685 parents participated in process of development (n=333) and validation (n=352). Cronbach's α and test-retest correlation were used to assess reliability. Content validity and construct validity were used to assess validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale consisted of five domains (access, understand, belief, communication and use) and 16 subdomains. The Cronbach's α for each domain and the whole scale was 0.85, 0.70, 0.87, 0.80, 0.79 and 0.85, respectively. The test-retest reliability was acceptable (intraclass correlations >0.70). Content validity was good (item-level content validity index >0.79, average of the scale-level content validity index >0.80, kappa >0.74). For construct validity for domain understand, χ<sup>2</sup>/df=1.723, p=0.009, standardised root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.0404, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.045, Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.942, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)=0.910; and for the other four domains, χ<sup>2</sup>/df=1.840, p<0.001, SRMR=0.043, RMSEA=0.049, CFI=0.958, TLI=0.952.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PHLS-PRTIs was developed and validated by a rigorous process, providing a tool for community doctors to measure parents' HL on child road traffic safety and develop targeted health education interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries for children aged 0-6 years in China.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohong Li, Miaomiao Chen, Yuheng Feng, Xueqi Ma, Jicui Zheng, Hanlin Shen, Jingwei Xia, Kaiyue Chen, Ying Guo, Qianghua Xia, Yu Jiang, Jun Lu, Fengshui Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ip-2023-045080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death in children. Parents' health literacy (HL) is closely related to child safety, especially for the young children. This study aimed to develop an intervention-oriented parent HL scale: Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries (PHLS-PRTIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed the scale including four parts: (1) definition and conceptualisation of PHLS-PRTIs; (2) domain and item development; (3) instrument construction; and (4) psychometric property validation. 685 parents participated in process of development (n=333) and validation (n=352). Cronbach's α and test-retest correlation were used to assess reliability. Content validity and construct validity were used to assess validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale consisted of five domains (access, understand, belief, communication and use) and 16 subdomains. The Cronbach's α for each domain and the whole scale was 0.85, 0.70, 0.87, 0.80, 0.79 and 0.85, respectively. The test-retest reliability was acceptable (intraclass correlations >0.70). Content validity was good (item-level content validity index >0.79, average of the scale-level content validity index >0.80, kappa >0.74). For construct validity for domain understand, χ<sup>2</sup>/df=1.723, p=0.009, standardised root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.0404, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.045, Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.942, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)=0.910; and for the other four domains, χ<sup>2</sup>/df=1.840, p<0.001, SRMR=0.043, RMSEA=0.049, CFI=0.958, TLI=0.952.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PHLS-PRTIs was developed and validated by a rigorous process, providing a tool for community doctors to measure parents' HL on child road traffic safety and develop targeted health education interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2023-045080\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2023-045080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:道路交通伤害是儿童死亡的主要原因。家长的健康素养(HL)与儿童安全密切相关,尤其是对幼儿而言。本研究旨在开发一种以干预为导向的家长健康素养量表:父母预防道路交通伤害健康素养量表(PHLS-PRTIs):我们开发的量表包括四个部分:(1)PHLS-PRTIs 的定义和概念化;(2)领域和项目开发;(3)工具构建;(4)心理测量学特性验证。685 名家长参与了开发(人数=333)和验证(人数=352)过程。Cronbach's α 和测试-再测试相关性用于评估信度。内容效度和结构效度用于评估效度:量表包括五个领域(获取、理解、信念、交流和使用)和 16 个子领域。各领域和整个量表的 Cronbach's α 分别为 0.85、0.70、0.87、0.80、0.79 和 0.85。重测信度可以接受(类内相关大于 0.70)。内容效度良好(项目级内容效度指数大于 0.79,量表级内容效度指数平均值大于 0.80,kappa 大于 0.74)。对于理解领域的建构效度,χ2/df=1.723,p=0.009,标准化均方根残差(SRR)=0.0404,均方根近似误差(RMSEA)=0.045,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.942,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)=0.910;对于其他四个领域的建构效度,χ2/df=1.840,p结论:PHLS-PRTIs经过严格的程序开发和验证,为社区医生测量家长对儿童道路交通安全的HL和制定有针对性的健康教育干预措施提供了工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries for children aged 0-6 years in China.

Background: Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death in children. Parents' health literacy (HL) is closely related to child safety, especially for the young children. This study aimed to develop an intervention-oriented parent HL scale: Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries (PHLS-PRTIs).

Methods: We developed the scale including four parts: (1) definition and conceptualisation of PHLS-PRTIs; (2) domain and item development; (3) instrument construction; and (4) psychometric property validation. 685 parents participated in process of development (n=333) and validation (n=352). Cronbach's α and test-retest correlation were used to assess reliability. Content validity and construct validity were used to assess validity.

Results: The scale consisted of five domains (access, understand, belief, communication and use) and 16 subdomains. The Cronbach's α for each domain and the whole scale was 0.85, 0.70, 0.87, 0.80, 0.79 and 0.85, respectively. The test-retest reliability was acceptable (intraclass correlations >0.70). Content validity was good (item-level content validity index >0.79, average of the scale-level content validity index >0.80, kappa >0.74). For construct validity for domain understand, χ2/df=1.723, p=0.009, standardised root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.0404, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.045, Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.942, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)=0.910; and for the other four domains, χ2/df=1.840, p<0.001, SRMR=0.043, RMSEA=0.049, CFI=0.958, TLI=0.952.

Conclusions: PHLS-PRTIs was developed and validated by a rigorous process, providing a tool for community doctors to measure parents' HL on child road traffic safety and develop targeted health education interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
期刊最新文献
Expression of concern about content of which Dr Paul McCrory is a single author. Analysing programme implementation across districts: a qualitative study of a national falls prevention initiative for older people in New Zealand. Epidemiology of burn injuries in a Canadian population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychosocial risks faced by olive workers in Spain: evaluated using the 'Mini Psychosocial Factors' questionnaire. Military spouse and key stakeholder perspectives of effective messaging for US service members on secure storage of personal firearms: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1