脉冲振荡测量法与 FeNO 的结合与学龄前儿童哮喘控制的关系。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S489639
Jiying Xiao, Lingyue Liu, Kamran Ali, Suling Wu, Junsong Chen
{"title":"脉冲振荡测量法与 FeNO 的结合与学龄前儿童哮喘控制的关系。","authors":"Jiying Xiao, Lingyue Liu, Kamran Ali, Suling Wu, Junsong Chen","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S489639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to observe and analyze the differences in impulse oscillometry (IOS) and fractional expiratory nitric oxide (FeNO) in relation to asthma control among preschool children, and to explore the predictive value of IOS combined with FeNO for uncontrolled asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 171 preschool children with asthma and 30 healthy preschool children between June 2022 and June 2023. We categorized the asthmatic children as having controlled asthma (n=85) and uncontrolled asthma (n=86) after a 3-month follow-up. IOS and FeNO were collected on the first visit at baseline. Differences in metrics were compared between controlled asthma, uncontrolled asthma and healthy control groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was utilized to explore the discriminative ability of IOS and FeNO, alone or in combination, against uncontrolled asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the controlled asthma group, the IOS values of R5, X5, R5-R20, and Fres were significantly higher in the uncontrolled asthma group, except for R20. R5 and R5-R20 had the highest area under the curve (AUC), which could reach 0.74 (95% CI 0.66-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.80). R20 had the lowest AUC of 0.59. The AUC for FeNO alone was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.93) with a cutoff value of 17.50 ppb, sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.89. The AUCs of all IOS metrics combined with FeNO were significantly higher, with the highest AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.96) for R5-R20+FeNO, and with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 and 0.84.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant differences in IOS and FeNO in relation to asthma control among preschooler children. FeNO might be the best predictor of asthma control, and adding any of IOS metrics increased moderately the predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1015-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impulse Oscillometry Combined to FeNO in Relation to Asthma Control Among Preschool Children.\",\"authors\":\"Jiying Xiao, Lingyue Liu, Kamran Ali, Suling Wu, Junsong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JAA.S489639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to observe and analyze the differences in impulse oscillometry (IOS) and fractional expiratory nitric oxide (FeNO) in relation to asthma control among preschool children, and to explore the predictive value of IOS combined with FeNO for uncontrolled asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 171 preschool children with asthma and 30 healthy preschool children between June 2022 and June 2023. We categorized the asthmatic children as having controlled asthma (n=85) and uncontrolled asthma (n=86) after a 3-month follow-up. IOS and FeNO were collected on the first visit at baseline. Differences in metrics were compared between controlled asthma, uncontrolled asthma and healthy control groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was utilized to explore the discriminative ability of IOS and FeNO, alone or in combination, against uncontrolled asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the controlled asthma group, the IOS values of R5, X5, R5-R20, and Fres were significantly higher in the uncontrolled asthma group, except for R20. R5 and R5-R20 had the highest area under the curve (AUC), which could reach 0.74 (95% CI 0.66-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.80). R20 had the lowest AUC of 0.59. The AUC for FeNO alone was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.93) with a cutoff value of 17.50 ppb, sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.89. The AUCs of all IOS metrics combined with FeNO were significantly higher, with the highest AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.96) for R5-R20+FeNO, and with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 and 0.84.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant differences in IOS and FeNO in relation to asthma control among preschooler children. FeNO might be the best predictor of asthma control, and adding any of IOS metrics increased moderately the predictive value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1015-1025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490204/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S489639\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S489639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们旨在观察和分析脉冲振荡仪(IOS)与呼气一氧化氮(FeNO)在学龄前儿童哮喘控制方面的差异,并探讨IOS与FeNO结合对未控制哮喘的预测价值:本研究在 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间招募了 171 名患有哮喘的学龄前儿童和 30 名健康的学龄前儿童。经过 3 个月的随访,我们将哮喘儿童分为已控制哮喘(85 人)和未控制哮喘(86 人)。我们在基线首次访问时收集了 IOS 和 FeNO。比较受控哮喘组、未受控哮喘组和健康对照组之间的指标差异。利用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)来探讨 IOS 和 FeNO 单独或联合使用对未受控哮喘的鉴别能力:结果:与受控哮喘组相比,除 R20 外,未受控哮喘组 R5、X5、R5-R20 和 Fres 的 IOS 值均显著升高。R5 和 R5-R20 的曲线下面积(AUC)最高,分别达到 0.74(95% CI 0.66-0.82)和 0.72(95% CI 0.64-0.80)。R20 的 AUC 最低,为 0.59。单纯 FeNO 的 AUC 为 0.88(95% CI 0.84-0.93),临界值为 17.50 ppb,敏感性和特异性分别为 0.73 和 0.89。所有 IOS 指标与 FeNO 结合后的 AUC 都明显更高,R5-R20+FeNO 的 AUC 最高,为 0.92(95% CI 0.87-0.96),灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.88 和 0.84:在学龄前儿童中,IOS 和 FeNO 与哮喘控制的关系存在明显差异。FeNO 可能是预测哮喘控制情况的最佳指标,增加任何一个 IOS 指标都会适度提高预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impulse Oscillometry Combined to FeNO in Relation to Asthma Control Among Preschool Children.

Objective: We aimed to observe and analyze the differences in impulse oscillometry (IOS) and fractional expiratory nitric oxide (FeNO) in relation to asthma control among preschool children, and to explore the predictive value of IOS combined with FeNO for uncontrolled asthma.

Methods: This study enrolled 171 preschool children with asthma and 30 healthy preschool children between June 2022 and June 2023. We categorized the asthmatic children as having controlled asthma (n=85) and uncontrolled asthma (n=86) after a 3-month follow-up. IOS and FeNO were collected on the first visit at baseline. Differences in metrics were compared between controlled asthma, uncontrolled asthma and healthy control groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was utilized to explore the discriminative ability of IOS and FeNO, alone or in combination, against uncontrolled asthma.

Results: Compared to the controlled asthma group, the IOS values of R5, X5, R5-R20, and Fres were significantly higher in the uncontrolled asthma group, except for R20. R5 and R5-R20 had the highest area under the curve (AUC), which could reach 0.74 (95% CI 0.66-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.80). R20 had the lowest AUC of 0.59. The AUC for FeNO alone was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.93) with a cutoff value of 17.50 ppb, sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.89. The AUCs of all IOS metrics combined with FeNO were significantly higher, with the highest AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.96) for R5-R20+FeNO, and with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 and 0.84.

Conclusion: There were significant differences in IOS and FeNO in relation to asthma control among preschooler children. FeNO might be the best predictor of asthma control, and adding any of IOS metrics increased moderately the predictive value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
期刊最新文献
Disease Modification in Asthma: Are We on the Right Way? A Multidisciplinary Expert Delphi Consensus (MODIASTHMA Consensus). Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma Identified as Responders to Omalizumab Treatment at 2 Years Based on the GETE Score Continued Treatment for an Extended Period. Differential Clinical Significance of FENO200 and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO). Benralizumab: Effectiveness in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma at 6 and 12 Months at a Third-Level Care Hospital. Capacity for ICS-LABA Therapy Reduction. Response to Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017-2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1