{"title":"考虑一阶三点顶点修正的全电子第一原理 GWΓ 模拟,用于准确预测核-电子结合能。","authors":"Kenta Yoneyama, Yoshifumi Noguchi, Kaoru Ohno","doi":"10.1063/5.0227580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the conventional GW method, the three-point vertex function (Γ) is approximated to unity (Γ ∼ 1). Here, we developed an all-electron first-principles GWΓ method beyond a conventional GW method by considering a first-order three-point vertex function (Γ(1) = 1 + iGGW) in a one-electron self-energy operator. We applied the GWΓ method to simulate the binding energies (BEs) of B1s, C1s, N1s, O1s, and F1s for 19 small-sized molecules. Contrary to the one-shot GW method [or G0W0(LDA)], which underestimates the experimentally determined absolute BEs by about 3.7 eV for B1s, 5.1 eV for C1s, 6.9 eV for N1s, 7.8 eV for O1s, and 5.8 eV for F1s, the GWΓ method successfully reduces these errors by approximately 1-2 eV for all the elements studied here. Notably, the first-order three-point vertex corrections are more significant for heavier elements, following the order of F > O > N > C > B1s. Finally, the computational cost analysis revealed that one term in the GWΓ one-electron self-energy operator, despite being computationally intensive, contributes negligibly (<0.1 eV) to the C1s, N1s, O1s, and F1s.</p>","PeriodicalId":15313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All-electron first-principles GWΓ simulations for accurately predicting core-electron binding energies considering first-order three-point vertex corrections.\",\"authors\":\"Kenta Yoneyama, Yoshifumi Noguchi, Kaoru Ohno\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0227580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the conventional GW method, the three-point vertex function (Γ) is approximated to unity (Γ ∼ 1). Here, we developed an all-electron first-principles GWΓ method beyond a conventional GW method by considering a first-order three-point vertex function (Γ(1) = 1 + iGGW) in a one-electron self-energy operator. We applied the GWΓ method to simulate the binding energies (BEs) of B1s, C1s, N1s, O1s, and F1s for 19 small-sized molecules. Contrary to the one-shot GW method [or G0W0(LDA)], which underestimates the experimentally determined absolute BEs by about 3.7 eV for B1s, 5.1 eV for C1s, 6.9 eV for N1s, 7.8 eV for O1s, and 5.8 eV for F1s, the GWΓ method successfully reduces these errors by approximately 1-2 eV for all the elements studied here. Notably, the first-order three-point vertex corrections are more significant for heavier elements, following the order of F > O > N > C > B1s. Finally, the computational cost analysis revealed that one term in the GWΓ one-electron self-energy operator, despite being computationally intensive, contributes negligibly (<0.1 eV) to the C1s, N1s, O1s, and F1s.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227580\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在传统的 GW 方法中,三点顶点函数 (Γ) 被近似为统一(Γ ∼ 1)。在这里,我们通过考虑单电子自能算子中的一阶三点顶点函数(Γ(1) = 1 + iGGW),发展了一种超越传统 GW 方法的全电子一阶原理 GWΓ 方法。我们应用 GWΓ 方法模拟了 19 种小分子的 B1s、C1s、N1s、O1s 和 F1s 结合能 (BE)。单次 GW 方法[或 G0W0(LDA)]低估了实验测定的 B1s、C1s、N1s、O1s 和 F1s 的绝对结合能,分别低估了约 3.7 eV、5.1 eV、6.9 eV、7.8 eV 和 5.8 eV,与之相反,GWΓ 方法成功地为本文研究的所有元素减少了约 1-2 eV 的误差。值得注意的是,按照 F > O > N > C > B1s 的顺序,一阶三点顶点修正对于较重的元素更为显著。最后,计算成本分析表明,GWΓ 单电子自能算子中的一个项尽管计算量很大,但其贡献可以忽略不计 (
In the conventional GW method, the three-point vertex function (Γ) is approximated to unity (Γ ∼ 1). Here, we developed an all-electron first-principles GWΓ method beyond a conventional GW method by considering a first-order three-point vertex function (Γ(1) = 1 + iGGW) in a one-electron self-energy operator. We applied the GWΓ method to simulate the binding energies (BEs) of B1s, C1s, N1s, O1s, and F1s for 19 small-sized molecules. Contrary to the one-shot GW method [or G0W0(LDA)], which underestimates the experimentally determined absolute BEs by about 3.7 eV for B1s, 5.1 eV for C1s, 6.9 eV for N1s, 7.8 eV for O1s, and 5.8 eV for F1s, the GWΓ method successfully reduces these errors by approximately 1-2 eV for all the elements studied here. Notably, the first-order three-point vertex corrections are more significant for heavier elements, following the order of F > O > N > C > B1s. Finally, the computational cost analysis revealed that one term in the GWΓ one-electron self-energy operator, despite being computationally intensive, contributes negligibly (<0.1 eV) to the C1s, N1s, O1s, and F1s.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Physics publishes quantitative and rigorous science of long-lasting value in methods and applications of chemical physics. The Journal also publishes brief Communications of significant new findings, Perspectives on the latest advances in the field, and Special Topic issues. The Journal focuses on innovative research in experimental and theoretical areas of chemical physics, including spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, and quantum mechanics. In addition, topical areas such as polymers, soft matter, materials, surfaces/interfaces, and systems of biological relevance are of increasing importance.
Topical coverage includes:
Theoretical Methods and Algorithms
Advanced Experimental Techniques
Atoms, Molecules, and Clusters
Liquids, Glasses, and Crystals
Surfaces, Interfaces, and Materials
Polymers and Soft Matter
Biological Molecules and Networks.