中性粒细胞百分比与白蛋白比率作为糖尿病患者全因死亡率和糖尿病致死率的生物标志物:来自1988-2018年NHANES的证据。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1002/jcla.25110
Yuanyuan Jing, Bowen Tian, Wenzhen Deng, Ziyu Ren, Xunmei Xu, Dongmin Zhang, Jing Zeng, Dongfang Liu
{"title":"中性粒细胞百分比与白蛋白比率作为糖尿病患者全因死亡率和糖尿病致死率的生物标志物:来自1988-2018年NHANES的证据。","authors":"Yuanyuan Jing,&nbsp;Bowen Tian,&nbsp;Wenzhen Deng,&nbsp;Ziyu Ren,&nbsp;Xunmei Xu,&nbsp;Dongmin Zhang,&nbsp;Jing Zeng,&nbsp;Dongfang Liu","doi":"10.1002/jcla.25110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) was significantly correlated with diabetes-related complications. There are little data about NPAR and mortality risk in individuals with diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included 3858 diabetes patients from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted from 1988 to 2018. Using a restricted cubic spline (RCS), the relationship between the NPAR and mortality risk was shown. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between the NPAR and diabetes-cause and all-cause death. An examination of the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to assess how well the NPAR predicted survival outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 3858 diabetes individuals, a total of 1198 (31.1%) died over a mean follow-up of 7.86 years; of these, 326 (8.4%) had diabetes-related deaths and 872 (22.6%) had deaths from other causes. The RCS regression analysis showed a positive linear association between the NPAR and all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality. High NPAR group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality in univariate and multivariate analysis. Compared with low NPAR group, high NPAR group had a low survival rate of diabetes cases in all-cause death and diabetes-cause mortality with area under the curve of the 3-, 5-, and 10-year ROC curve being 0.725, 0.739, and 0.734 for all-cause mortality and 0.754, 0.752, and 0.745 for diabetes-cause mortality, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In summary, we examined 3858 diabetes patients from NHANES database (1998–2018) and suggested NPAR as a biomarker for all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality prediction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":"38 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Biomarker for All-Cause and Diabetes-Cause Mortality Among Diabetes Patients: Evidence From the NHANES 1988–2018\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Jing,&nbsp;Bowen Tian,&nbsp;Wenzhen Deng,&nbsp;Ziyu Ren,&nbsp;Xunmei Xu,&nbsp;Dongmin Zhang,&nbsp;Jing Zeng,&nbsp;Dongfang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcla.25110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) was significantly correlated with diabetes-related complications. There are little data about NPAR and mortality risk in individuals with diabetes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study included 3858 diabetes patients from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted from 1988 to 2018. Using a restricted cubic spline (RCS), the relationship between the NPAR and mortality risk was shown. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between the NPAR and diabetes-cause and all-cause death. An examination of the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to assess how well the NPAR predicted survival outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 3858 diabetes individuals, a total of 1198 (31.1%) died over a mean follow-up of 7.86 years; of these, 326 (8.4%) had diabetes-related deaths and 872 (22.6%) had deaths from other causes. The RCS regression analysis showed a positive linear association between the NPAR and all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality. High NPAR group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality in univariate and multivariate analysis. Compared with low NPAR group, high NPAR group had a low survival rate of diabetes cases in all-cause death and diabetes-cause mortality with area under the curve of the 3-, 5-, and 10-year ROC curve being 0.725, 0.739, and 0.734 for all-cause mortality and 0.754, 0.752, and 0.745 for diabetes-cause mortality, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In summary, we examined 3858 diabetes patients from NHANES database (1998–2018) and suggested NPAR as a biomarker for all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality prediction.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis\",\"volume\":\"38 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.25110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.25110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中性粒细胞百分比与白蛋白比率(NPAR)与糖尿病相关并发症有显著相关性。有关 NPAR 和糖尿病患者死亡风险的数据很少:本研究纳入了 3858 名糖尿病患者,这些患者来自 1988 年至 2018 年进行的美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)。使用受限立方样条曲线(RCS)显示了NPAR与死亡风险之间的关系。多变量 Cox 回归模型用于评估 NPAR 与糖尿病病因死亡和全因死亡之间的关系。利用与时间相关的接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)来评估 NPAR 预测生存结果的能力:在 3858 名糖尿病患者中,共有 1198 人(31.1%)在平均 7.86 年的随访期间死亡,其中 326 人(8.4%)与糖尿病相关,872 人(22.6%)死于其他原因。RCS回归分析显示,NPAR与全因死亡率和糖尿病病因死亡率呈正线性关系。在单变量和多变量分析中,高 NPAR 组的全因和糖尿病原因死亡风险明显更高。与低NPAR组相比,高NPAR组糖尿病病例在全因死亡和糖尿病病因死亡中的存活率较低,3年、5年和10年ROC曲线下面积分别为:全因死亡0.725、0.739和0.734,糖尿病病因死亡0.754、0.752和0.745:综上所述,我们研究了NHANES数据库(1998-2018年)中的3858名糖尿病患者,并建议将NPAR作为预测全因死亡率和糖尿病病因死亡率的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Biomarker for All-Cause and Diabetes-Cause Mortality Among Diabetes Patients: Evidence From the NHANES 1988–2018

Background

Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) was significantly correlated with diabetes-related complications. There are little data about NPAR and mortality risk in individuals with diabetes.

Methods

This study included 3858 diabetes patients from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted from 1988 to 2018. Using a restricted cubic spline (RCS), the relationship between the NPAR and mortality risk was shown. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between the NPAR and diabetes-cause and all-cause death. An examination of the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to assess how well the NPAR predicted survival outcomes.

Results

Among 3858 diabetes individuals, a total of 1198 (31.1%) died over a mean follow-up of 7.86 years; of these, 326 (8.4%) had diabetes-related deaths and 872 (22.6%) had deaths from other causes. The RCS regression analysis showed a positive linear association between the NPAR and all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality. High NPAR group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality in univariate and multivariate analysis. Compared with low NPAR group, high NPAR group had a low survival rate of diabetes cases in all-cause death and diabetes-cause mortality with area under the curve of the 3-, 5-, and 10-year ROC curve being 0.725, 0.739, and 0.734 for all-cause mortality and 0.754, 0.752, and 0.745 for diabetes-cause mortality, respectively.

Conclusion

In summary, we examined 3858 diabetes patients from NHANES database (1998–2018) and suggested NPAR as a biomarker for all-cause and diabetes-cause mortality prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of glna Loss on the Physiological and Pathological Phenotype of Parkinson's Disease C. elegans. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: The Mechanism of Pathogenicity, Immune Responses, and Diagnostic Challenges. Issue Information Letter to the Editor Based on Article "Analysis of Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Patients With α-Thalassemia From Fujian Province, Southeastern China". Interpretable Machine Learning Algorithms Identify Inetetamab-Mediated Metabolic Signatures and Biomarkers in Treating Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1