多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在结肠镜检查正常后进行结直肠癌筛查的实用性。

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s12029-024-01118-3
Abhinav K Rao, Shivam Kalra, Brett Van Leer-Greenberg, Don C Rockey
{"title":"多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在结肠镜检查正常后进行结直肠癌筛查的实用性。","authors":"Abhinav K Rao, Shivam Kalra, Brett Van Leer-Greenberg, Don C Rockey","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01118-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests (here, Cologuard®) are currently used in average-risk patients as a primary method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, MT-sDNA testing has also been used in patients who previously underwent colonoscopy who wish to avoid repeat colonoscopy. Here, in a large primary care practice setting, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA testing in patients with a previously normal colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 5827 patients from 35 different primary locations in South Carolina. Patients aged 45 and above with a previously documented normal, high-quality colonoscopy prior to the MT-sDNA test date were included. High-risk patients and those with a previous negative MT-sDNA result were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5827 ordered MT-sDNA tests, 248 patients had a prior normal colonoscopy. The average time from initial colonoscopy to MT-sDNA testing was 7.3 years. Of the 63 patients who had a positive MT-sDNA test, 41 patients (65%) completed follow-up colonoscopy and 40 patients had complete colonoscopy data. Of these 40 patients, 12 patients (30%) had advanced adenomas and none had colorectal cancer. Compared to patients without a previous colonoscopy, patients with prior colonoscopies had fewer adenomas of all types (1.6 vs 2.4) and fewer advanced adenomas (1.4 vs 2.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a previously negative colonoscopy and subsequent positive MT-sDNA test were found to have a high rate of advanced adenomas on follow-up colonoscopy (30%). Thus, in patients with a previously negative colonoscopy, MT-sDNA testing may be a reasonable alternative screening option.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening After a Normal Colonoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Abhinav K Rao, Shivam Kalra, Brett Van Leer-Greenberg, Don C Rockey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12029-024-01118-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests (here, Cologuard®) are currently used in average-risk patients as a primary method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, MT-sDNA testing has also been used in patients who previously underwent colonoscopy who wish to avoid repeat colonoscopy. Here, in a large primary care practice setting, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA testing in patients with a previously normal colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 5827 patients from 35 different primary locations in South Carolina. Patients aged 45 and above with a previously documented normal, high-quality colonoscopy prior to the MT-sDNA test date were included. High-risk patients and those with a previous negative MT-sDNA result were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5827 ordered MT-sDNA tests, 248 patients had a prior normal colonoscopy. The average time from initial colonoscopy to MT-sDNA testing was 7.3 years. Of the 63 patients who had a positive MT-sDNA test, 41 patients (65%) completed follow-up colonoscopy and 40 patients had complete colonoscopy data. Of these 40 patients, 12 patients (30%) had advanced adenomas and none had colorectal cancer. Compared to patients without a previous colonoscopy, patients with prior colonoscopies had fewer adenomas of all types (1.6 vs 2.4) and fewer advanced adenomas (1.4 vs 2.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a previously negative colonoscopy and subsequent positive MT-sDNA test were found to have a high rate of advanced adenomas on follow-up colonoscopy (30%). Thus, in patients with a previously negative colonoscopy, MT-sDNA testing may be a reasonable alternative screening option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01118-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01118-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多靶点粪便 DNA(MT-sDNA)检测(此处为 Cologuard®)目前用于普通风险患者,作为筛查结直肠癌的主要方法。然而,MT-sDNA 检测也被用于曾接受过结肠镜检查但希望避免再次接受结肠镜检查的患者。在这里,我们的目的是在大型初级医疗机构中评估 MT-sDNA 检测对结肠镜检查结果正常的患者的诊断效果:这项回顾性队列研究包括来自南卡罗来纳州 35 个不同基层医疗机构的 5827 名患者。研究对象包括年龄在 45 岁及以上、在 MT-sDNA 检测日期前曾接受过正常、高质量结肠镜检查的患者。不包括高危患者和 MT-sDNA 结果为阴性的患者:结果:在 5827 位接受 MT-sDNA 检测的患者中,有 248 位患者之前的结肠镜检查结果正常。从初次结肠镜检查到 MT-sDNA 检测的平均时间为 7.3 年。在 MT-sDNA 检测呈阳性的 63 名患者中,41 名患者(65%)完成了后续结肠镜检查,40 名患者有完整的结肠镜检查数据。在这 40 名患者中,12 名患者(30%)患有晚期腺瘤,没有人罹患大肠癌。与既往未接受过结肠镜检查的患者相比,既往接受过结肠镜检查的患者所有类型腺瘤的数量较少(1.6 对 2.4),晚期腺瘤的数量较少(1.4 对 2.0):结论:先前结肠镜检查呈阴性、随后 MT-sDNA 检测呈阳性的患者在后续结肠镜检查中发现晚期腺瘤的比例较高(30%)。因此,对于结肠镜检查阴性的患者,MT-DNA 检测可能是一种合理的替代筛查选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening After a Normal Colonoscopy.

Background: Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests (here, Cologuard®) are currently used in average-risk patients as a primary method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, MT-sDNA testing has also been used in patients who previously underwent colonoscopy who wish to avoid repeat colonoscopy. Here, in a large primary care practice setting, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA testing in patients with a previously normal colonoscopy.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 5827 patients from 35 different primary locations in South Carolina. Patients aged 45 and above with a previously documented normal, high-quality colonoscopy prior to the MT-sDNA test date were included. High-risk patients and those with a previous negative MT-sDNA result were excluded.

Results: Of 5827 ordered MT-sDNA tests, 248 patients had a prior normal colonoscopy. The average time from initial colonoscopy to MT-sDNA testing was 7.3 years. Of the 63 patients who had a positive MT-sDNA test, 41 patients (65%) completed follow-up colonoscopy and 40 patients had complete colonoscopy data. Of these 40 patients, 12 patients (30%) had advanced adenomas and none had colorectal cancer. Compared to patients without a previous colonoscopy, patients with prior colonoscopies had fewer adenomas of all types (1.6 vs 2.4) and fewer advanced adenomas (1.4 vs 2.0).

Conclusion: Patients with a previously negative colonoscopy and subsequent positive MT-sDNA test were found to have a high rate of advanced adenomas on follow-up colonoscopy (30%). Thus, in patients with a previously negative colonoscopy, MT-sDNA testing may be a reasonable alternative screening option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
期刊最新文献
Primary Intrahepatic Mesothelioma: Case Series and Systematic Review of Literature. Liver Oligometastasis in Biliary Tract Cancer and Impact on Survival Outcomes. Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Immunotherapy- Versus Chemotherapy-Based Regimens: Systematic Review and Pooled Analyses. Advanced Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Current and Novel Techniques. Both Th1 and Th2 CD4 + T-Cell Lineage Infiltrations Decrease in Post-hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Colon Adenoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1