Muhammad Zia Khan, Bandar Alyami, Waleed Alruwaili, Amanda T Nguyen, Melody Mendez, William E Leon, Justin Devera, Hafiz Muhammad Sohaib Hayat, Abdullah Naveed, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Siddharth Agarwal, Sudarshan Balla, Douglas Darden, Muhammad Bilal Munir
{"title":"美国无导线起搏器植入术的性别结果。","authors":"Muhammad Zia Khan, Bandar Alyami, Waleed Alruwaili, Amanda T Nguyen, Melody Mendez, William E Leon, Justin Devera, Hafiz Muhammad Sohaib Hayat, Abdullah Naveed, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Siddharth Agarwal, Sudarshan Balla, Douglas Darden, Muhammad Bilal Munir","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01936-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation based on sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the purpose of this study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database for years 2016-2020. The study group was then stratified based on sex. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes including complications were then analyzed in each group. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to analyze the association of sex with important outcomes of mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention and any vascular complication), prolonged length of stay (defined as > 6 days), and increased cost of hospitalization (defined as median cost > 34,098$) after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,000 leadless pacemakers (n in women = 12,960, 44.7%) were implanted during our study period. Women were found to have an increased burden of co-morbidities as compared to men. In the adjusted analysis, the likelihood of mortality (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.43), major complications (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.18), prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15), and increased hospitalization cost (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20) were higher in women as compared to men after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Important and significant differences exist in leadless pacemaker implantation in women as compared to men. These findings highlight the need for evaluating etiologies behind such differences with a goal of improving outcomes in all patients after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States based on sex.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Zia Khan, Bandar Alyami, Waleed Alruwaili, Amanda T Nguyen, Melody Mendez, William E Leon, Justin Devera, Hafiz Muhammad Sohaib Hayat, Abdullah Naveed, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Siddharth Agarwal, Sudarshan Balla, Douglas Darden, Muhammad Bilal Munir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01936-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation based on sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the purpose of this study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database for years 2016-2020. The study group was then stratified based on sex. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes including complications were then analyzed in each group. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to analyze the association of sex with important outcomes of mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention and any vascular complication), prolonged length of stay (defined as > 6 days), and increased cost of hospitalization (defined as median cost > 34,098$) after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,000 leadless pacemakers (n in women = 12,960, 44.7%) were implanted during our study period. Women were found to have an increased burden of co-morbidities as compared to men. In the adjusted analysis, the likelihood of mortality (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.43), major complications (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.18), prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15), and increased hospitalization cost (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20) were higher in women as compared to men after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Important and significant differences exist in leadless pacemaker implantation in women as compared to men. These findings highlight the need for evaluating etiologies behind such differences with a goal of improving outcomes in all patients after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01936-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01936-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:旨在确定无导线起搏器植入术的基线特征和结果与性别的差异:目的:确定基于性别的无引线起搏器植入的基线特征和结果差异:本研究从全国住院患者抽样数据库中提取了 2016-2020 年的数据。然后根据性别对研究组进行分层。然后分析各组的基线特征和院内结局(包括并发症)。建立多变量逻辑回归模型,分析性别与无引线起搏器植入术后死亡率、主要并发症(定义为需要介入治疗的心包积液和任何血管并发症)、住院时间延长(定义为大于 6 天)和住院费用增加(定义为费用中位数大于 34,098 美元)等重要结果的相关性:研究期间共植入了 29,000 个无引线起搏器(女性为 12,960 个,占 44.7%)。与男性相比,女性的并发症负担更重。在调整分析中,与男性相比,女性在无引线起搏器植入术后的死亡率(aOR 1.27,95% CI 1.14-1.43)、主要并发症(aOR 1.07,95% CI 0.98-1.18)、住院时间延长(aOR 1.09,95% CI 1.04-1.15)和住院费用增加(aOR 1.14,95% CI 1.08-1.20)的可能性更高:结论:与男性相比,女性在无引线起搏器植入方面存在重要且显著的差异。结论:在无导线起搏器植入术中,女性与男性存在重要且显著的差异,这些发现强调了评估这些差异背后病因的必要性,目的是改善所有无导线起搏器植入术患者的预后。
Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States based on sex.
Background: To determine differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation based on sex.
Methods: For the purpose of this study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database for years 2016-2020. The study group was then stratified based on sex. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes including complications were then analyzed in each group. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to analyze the association of sex with important outcomes of mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention and any vascular complication), prolonged length of stay (defined as > 6 days), and increased cost of hospitalization (defined as median cost > 34,098$) after leadless pacemaker implantation.
Results: A total of 29,000 leadless pacemakers (n in women = 12,960, 44.7%) were implanted during our study period. Women were found to have an increased burden of co-morbidities as compared to men. In the adjusted analysis, the likelihood of mortality (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.43), major complications (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.18), prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15), and increased hospitalization cost (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20) were higher in women as compared to men after leadless pacemaker implantation.
Conclusion: Important and significant differences exist in leadless pacemaker implantation in women as compared to men. These findings highlight the need for evaluating etiologies behind such differences with a goal of improving outcomes in all patients after leadless pacemaker implantation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.