Michael K Parvizian, Mitchell V Edwards, Prem Bhoey, Melanie C Zhang, Lawrence C Hookey, David M Rodrigues
{"title":"内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的适应症与出血的发生:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Michael K Parvizian, Mitchell V Edwards, Prem Bhoey, Melanie C Zhang, Lawrence C Hookey, David M Rodrigues","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemorrhage is a common complication associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), usually following sphincterotomy. Studies investigating risk factors for hemorrhage including ERCP indication have been conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize the association between the ERCP indication and hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were conducted to identify articles up to December 12, 2022. Randomized trials or observational studies of adult patients undergoing ERCP were included. Quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales for randomized trials and observational studies respectively was conducted. A random effects meta-analysis generating pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1323 articles were identified of which 26 were included with up to 25 121 subjects in each meta-analysis. Rates of sphincterotomy (median 96.1%; IQR 60.5-100), biliary stent placement (median 17.2%; IQR 10.6-34.4), antiplatelet use (median 6.0%; IQR 0-10.1), and anticoagulant use (median 1.9%; IQR 0%-3.2%) varied among included studies. No specific indication was associated with hemorrhage in the meta-analyses including cholangitis (OR 1.50; 95% CI 0.97-2.32), choledocholithiasis/biliary stone (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.95-1.73), malignancy (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.66-1.42), sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.72-2.40), and acute pancreatitis (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.44-1.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, no indication was significantly associated with increased hemorrhage following ERCP. However, given limitations in the included studies (ie, significant heterogeneity between studies), additional research to better characterize these associations is needed.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration number: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42021283978).</p>","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and development of hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michael K Parvizian, Mitchell V Edwards, Prem Bhoey, Melanie C Zhang, Lawrence C Hookey, David M Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jcag/gwae014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemorrhage is a common complication associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), usually following sphincterotomy. Studies investigating risk factors for hemorrhage including ERCP indication have been conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize the association between the ERCP indication and hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were conducted to identify articles up to December 12, 2022. Randomized trials or observational studies of adult patients undergoing ERCP were included. Quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales for randomized trials and observational studies respectively was conducted. A random effects meta-analysis generating pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1323 articles were identified of which 26 were included with up to 25 121 subjects in each meta-analysis. Rates of sphincterotomy (median 96.1%; IQR 60.5-100), biliary stent placement (median 17.2%; IQR 10.6-34.4), antiplatelet use (median 6.0%; IQR 0-10.1), and anticoagulant use (median 1.9%; IQR 0%-3.2%) varied among included studies. No specific indication was associated with hemorrhage in the meta-analyses including cholangitis (OR 1.50; 95% CI 0.97-2.32), choledocholithiasis/biliary stone (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.95-1.73), malignancy (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.66-1.42), sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.72-2.40), and acute pancreatitis (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.44-1.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, no indication was significantly associated with increased hemorrhage following ERCP. However, given limitations in the included studies (ie, significant heterogeneity between studies), additional research to better characterize these associations is needed.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration number: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42021283978).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:出血是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的常见并发症,通常发生在括约肌切开术之后。有关出血风险因素(包括ERCP适应症)的研究结果相互矛盾。因此,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定ERCP适应症与出血之间的关系:方法:对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 进行数据库检索,以确定截至 2022 年 12 月 12 日的文章。研究纳入了对接受ERCP治疗的成人患者进行的随机试验或观察性研究。对随机试验和观察性研究分别采用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 和 Newcastle-Ottawa Scales 进行了质量评估。进行随机效应荟萃分析,得出汇总的几率比及 95% 的置信区间:结果:共发现了 1323 篇文章,其中 26 篇被纳入荟萃分析,每篇荟萃分析的受试者多达 25 121 人。括约肌切开术(中位数 96.1%;IQR 60.5-100)、胆道支架置入术(中位数 17.2%;IQR 10.6-34.4)、抗血小板使用(中位数 6.0%;IQR 0-10.1)和抗凝剂使用(中位数 1.9%;IQR 0%-3.2%)的比率在纳入的研究中各不相同。在包括胆管炎(OR 1.50;95% CI 0.97-2.32)、胆总管结石/胆道结石(OR 1.28;95% CI 0.95-1.73)、恶性肿瘤(OR 0.97;95% CI 0.66-1.42)、Oddi括约肌功能障碍(OR 1.32;95% CI 0.72-2.40)和急性胰腺炎(OR 0.81;95% CI 0.44-1.49):总体而言,ERCP术后出血量增加与适应症无明显关联。然而,鉴于纳入研究的局限性(即研究之间存在明显的异质性),需要进行更多的研究以更好地描述这些关联:prospero(CRD42021283978)。
Indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and development of hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Hemorrhage is a common complication associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), usually following sphincterotomy. Studies investigating risk factors for hemorrhage including ERCP indication have been conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize the association between the ERCP indication and hemorrhage.
Methods: Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were conducted to identify articles up to December 12, 2022. Randomized trials or observational studies of adult patients undergoing ERCP were included. Quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales for randomized trials and observational studies respectively was conducted. A random effects meta-analysis generating pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals was conducted.
Results: A total of 1323 articles were identified of which 26 were included with up to 25 121 subjects in each meta-analysis. Rates of sphincterotomy (median 96.1%; IQR 60.5-100), biliary stent placement (median 17.2%; IQR 10.6-34.4), antiplatelet use (median 6.0%; IQR 0-10.1), and anticoagulant use (median 1.9%; IQR 0%-3.2%) varied among included studies. No specific indication was associated with hemorrhage in the meta-analyses including cholangitis (OR 1.50; 95% CI 0.97-2.32), choledocholithiasis/biliary stone (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.95-1.73), malignancy (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.66-1.42), sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.72-2.40), and acute pancreatitis (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.44-1.49).
Conclusions: Overall, no indication was significantly associated with increased hemorrhage following ERCP. However, given limitations in the included studies (ie, significant heterogeneity between studies), additional research to better characterize these associations is needed.