简化的双时点 99m锝-焦磷酸闪烁扫描用于疑似经蝶雷肽淀粉样变性心肌病患者:单中心系列。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2024.10.008
Yi-San Shih , Shan-Ying Wang , Bing-Hsiean Tzeng , Wen-Po Chuang , Yen-Wen Wu
{"title":"简化的双时点 99m锝-焦磷酸闪烁扫描用于疑似经蝶雷肽淀粉样变性心肌病患者:单中心系列。","authors":"Yi-San Shih ,&nbsp;Shan-Ying Wang ,&nbsp;Bing-Hsiean Tzeng ,&nbsp;Wen-Po Chuang ,&nbsp;Yen-Wen Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal imaging time points and imaging techniques between planar and/or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) acquisitions for technetium-99 m pyrophosphate (<sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP) cardiac scintigraphy. The aim of this study was to investigate correlations between planar and SPECT/CT images and between 1-h and 3-h imaging time points.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with clinically suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy who underwent <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP scintigraphy from November 1, 2019 to November 30, 2022. Visual scores were compared between 1- and 3-h imaging time points and between planar and SPECT/CT acquisitions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 100 patients (66% male; mean age, 65 years) were included, and 1- and 3-h planar and SPECT/CT images were obtained for 97 patients. There was a significant difference in visual grading scores between 1- and 3-h time points on both planar and SPECT/CT imaging, with a downgrade in score in 61 of 99 (61%) cases on planar imaging, and in 14 of 97 (14%) cases on SPECT/CT imaging (p &lt; 0.001). There were significant differences in visual grading scores between planar and SPECT/CT imaging at both time points, with cases being scored higher on planar imaging than on SPECT/CT imaging (81/97 cases for 1-h imaging, and 50/97 cases for 3-h imaging) (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Simplified 1-h SPECT/CT imaging with visual score and selective use of 3-h SPECT/CT imaging may be an efficient protocol and may reduce the potential for over-scoring and equivocal interpretation. Further validation in larger and more diverse populations is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":"124 12","pages":"Pages 1135-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified dual-time-point 99mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy in patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: A single center series\",\"authors\":\"Yi-San Shih ,&nbsp;Shan-Ying Wang ,&nbsp;Bing-Hsiean Tzeng ,&nbsp;Wen-Po Chuang ,&nbsp;Yen-Wen Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfma.2024.10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal imaging time points and imaging techniques between planar and/or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) acquisitions for technetium-99 m pyrophosphate (<sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP) cardiac scintigraphy. The aim of this study was to investigate correlations between planar and SPECT/CT images and between 1-h and 3-h imaging time points.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with clinically suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy who underwent <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP scintigraphy from November 1, 2019 to November 30, 2022. Visual scores were compared between 1- and 3-h imaging time points and between planar and SPECT/CT acquisitions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 100 patients (66% male; mean age, 65 years) were included, and 1- and 3-h planar and SPECT/CT images were obtained for 97 patients. There was a significant difference in visual grading scores between 1- and 3-h time points on both planar and SPECT/CT imaging, with a downgrade in score in 61 of 99 (61%) cases on planar imaging, and in 14 of 97 (14%) cases on SPECT/CT imaging (p &lt; 0.001). There were significant differences in visual grading scores between planar and SPECT/CT imaging at both time points, with cases being scored higher on planar imaging than on SPECT/CT imaging (81/97 cases for 1-h imaging, and 50/97 cases for 3-h imaging) (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Simplified 1-h SPECT/CT imaging with visual score and selective use of 3-h SPECT/CT imaging may be an efficient protocol and may reduce the potential for over-scoring and equivocal interpretation. Further validation in larger and more diverse populations is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"124 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1135-1140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664624004844\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664624004844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于平面和/或单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)/计算机断层扫描(CT)获取锝-99焦磷酸(99mTc-PYP)心脏闪烁成像的最佳成像时间点和成像技术缺乏共识。本研究的目的是研究平面和SPECT/CT图像之间以及1小时和3小时成像时间点之间的相关性。方法回顾性分析2019年11月1日至2022年11月30日连续接受99mTc-PYP显像检查的临床疑似转甲状腺素淀粉样心肌病患者。视觉评分在1小时和3小时成像时间点之间以及平面和SPECT/CT图像之间进行比较。结果共100例患者,其中男性66%;平均年龄65岁),获得97例患者的1、3小时平面和SPECT/CT图像。平面影像和SPECT/CT影像在1小时和3小时时间点上的视觉分级评分有显著差异,99例平面影像中有61例(61%)评分下降,97例SPECT/CT影像中有14例(14%)评分下降(p < 0.001)。平面影像与SPECT/CT影像在两个时间点的视觉分级评分差异均有统计学意义,平面影像评分高于SPECT/CT影像(1小时81/97例,3小时50/97例)(p < 0.001)。结论简化1小时SPECT/CT成像并结合视觉评分和选择性使用3小时SPECT/CT成像可能是一种有效的方案,可以减少评分过高和解释不清的可能性。需要在更大和更多样化的人群中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simplified dual-time-point 99mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy in patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: A single center series

Background

There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal imaging time points and imaging techniques between planar and/or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) acquisitions for technetium-99 m pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) cardiac scintigraphy. The aim of this study was to investigate correlations between planar and SPECT/CT images and between 1-h and 3-h imaging time points.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with clinically suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy who underwent 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy from November 1, 2019 to November 30, 2022. Visual scores were compared between 1- and 3-h imaging time points and between planar and SPECT/CT acquisitions.

Results

A total of 100 patients (66% male; mean age, 65 years) were included, and 1- and 3-h planar and SPECT/CT images were obtained for 97 patients. There was a significant difference in visual grading scores between 1- and 3-h time points on both planar and SPECT/CT imaging, with a downgrade in score in 61 of 99 (61%) cases on planar imaging, and in 14 of 97 (14%) cases on SPECT/CT imaging (p < 0.001). There were significant differences in visual grading scores between planar and SPECT/CT imaging at both time points, with cases being scored higher on planar imaging than on SPECT/CT imaging (81/97 cases for 1-h imaging, and 50/97 cases for 3-h imaging) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Simplified 1-h SPECT/CT imaging with visual score and selective use of 3-h SPECT/CT imaging may be an efficient protocol and may reduce the potential for over-scoring and equivocal interpretation. Further validation in larger and more diverse populations is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Person separation and longitudinal invariance: overlooked considerations in validating generic QOL instruments for non-dialysis CKD. Comment on "Perioperative copeptin elevations and prediction of myocardial injury and acute kidney injury after abdominal surgery: A preliminary prospective observational study". Optimizing the clinical management of prostate cancer in Taiwan: A multidisciplinary consensus. Comment on "Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A real-world propensity score-matched study". Potential confounding effect of chemotherapy backbone imbalance on the efficacy assessment of pyrotinib plus trastuzumab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1