比较 CHOP-19 和 CHOP-25 治疗犬外周结节性 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效:欧洲多中心回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1111/jvim.17222
Charles Hawkes, Joanna Morris, Spela Bavcar, Craig Wilkie, Surajit Ray, Charlotte Auquier, Sarah Benjamin, Juan Borrego Massó, Sébastien Bottin, Owen Davies, Isabelle Desmas-Bazelle, Anat Einhorn, Celia Figueroa-Gonzalez, Katerina Holenova, Elisavet Kritsotalaki, Kerry Peak, Katherine Smallwood, Elisabetta Treggiari, Paola Valenti, Miguel Garcia de la Virgen, Quentin Fournier
{"title":"比较 CHOP-19 和 CHOP-25 治疗犬外周结节性 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效:欧洲多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Charles Hawkes, Joanna Morris, Spela Bavcar, Craig Wilkie, Surajit Ray, Charlotte Auquier, Sarah Benjamin, Juan Borrego Massó, Sébastien Bottin, Owen Davies, Isabelle Desmas-Bazelle, Anat Einhorn, Celia Figueroa-Gonzalez, Katerina Holenova, Elisavet Kritsotalaki, Kerry Peak, Katherine Smallwood, Elisabetta Treggiari, Paola Valenti, Miguel Garcia de la Virgen, Quentin Fournier","doi":"10.1111/jvim.17222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Five hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>Our study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":17462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 for treatment of peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma in dogs: A European multicenter retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Hawkes, Joanna Morris, Spela Bavcar, Craig Wilkie, Surajit Ray, Charlotte Auquier, Sarah Benjamin, Juan Borrego Massó, Sébastien Bottin, Owen Davies, Isabelle Desmas-Bazelle, Anat Einhorn, Celia Figueroa-Gonzalez, Katerina Holenova, Elisavet Kritsotalaki, Kerry Peak, Katherine Smallwood, Elisabetta Treggiari, Paola Valenti, Miguel Garcia de la Virgen, Quentin Fournier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvim.17222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Five hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>Our study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17222\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外周结节B细胞淋巴瘤(PNBCL)是狗淋巴瘤中最常见的一种。以多药 CHOP(C=环磷酰胺,H=羟基多柔比星[Doxorubicin],O=Oncovin,P=泼尼松龙)为基础的化疗方案已被广泛接受为一线治疗的金标准。CHOP-25和CHOP-19是最常用的化疗方案,但从未进行过直接比较:我们的主要目的是比较采用 CHOP-19 或 CHOP-25 方案一线治疗的 PNBCL 诊断犬的疗效。次要目标是确定方案相关变量对疗效的影响:动物:来自欧洲 16 家肿瘤转诊中心的 52 只狗。方法:回顾性多中心队列研究:方法:对 2014 年至 2021 年期间诊断为 PNBCL 的狗进行回顾性、多中心队列研究:CHOP-19的6个月、1年和中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为56.5%(95%置信区间[CI],49.2-65.0)、14.1%(95% CI,9.4-21.0)和196天(95% CI,176-233);CHOP-25的6个月、1年和中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为56.4%(95% CI,51.4-61.9)、17%(95% CI,13.4-21.6)和209天(95% CI,187-224)。CHOP-19的1年、2年和中位总生存期(OS)分别为36.9%(95% CI,29.7-46.0)、13.5%(95% CI,8.6-21.1)和302天(95% CI,249-338);CHOP-25的1年、2年和中位总生存期(OS)分别为42.8%(95% CI,37.7-48.7)、15.4%(95% CI,11.7-20.4)和321天(95% CI,293-357)。两种方案的 PFS 和 OS 无明显差异:我们的研究证实,一线CHOP-19或CHOP-25治疗PNBCL犬的疗效相似。因此,这两种方案在未来的试验中均可作为标准治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 for treatment of peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma in dogs: A European multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Background: Peripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared.

Objectives: Our primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes.

Animals: Five hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25.

Methods: Retrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021.

Results: The 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols.

Conclusions and clinical importance: Our study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Veterinary-General Veterinary
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
期刊最新文献
Salivary peptidomic profiling of chronic gingivostomatitis in cats by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and nanoscale liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Effect of phenylbutazone administration on the enteroinsular axis in horses with insulin dysregulation. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors for worsening renal function after angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment in dogs. Genotyping and drug susceptibility profiling of Prototheca sp. strains isolated from cases of protothecosis in dogs. Evaluation of laboratory findings indicating pancreatitis in healthy lean, obese, and diabetic cats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1