Charles Hawkes, Joanna Morris, Spela Bavcar, Craig Wilkie, Surajit Ray, Charlotte Auquier, Sarah Benjamin, Juan Borrego Massó, Sébastien Bottin, Owen Davies, Isabelle Desmas-Bazelle, Anat Einhorn, Celia Figueroa-Gonzalez, Katerina Holenova, Elisavet Kritsotalaki, Kerry Peak, Katherine Smallwood, Elisabetta Treggiari, Paola Valenti, Miguel Garcia de la Virgen, Quentin Fournier
{"title":"比较 CHOP-19 和 CHOP-25 治疗犬外周结节性 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效:欧洲多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Charles Hawkes, Joanna Morris, Spela Bavcar, Craig Wilkie, Surajit Ray, Charlotte Auquier, Sarah Benjamin, Juan Borrego Massó, Sébastien Bottin, Owen Davies, Isabelle Desmas-Bazelle, Anat Einhorn, Celia Figueroa-Gonzalez, Katerina Holenova, Elisavet Kritsotalaki, Kerry Peak, Katherine Smallwood, Elisabetta Treggiari, Paola Valenti, Miguel Garcia de la Virgen, Quentin Fournier","doi":"10.1111/jvim.17222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Five hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>Our study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":17462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 for treatment of peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma in dogs: A European multicenter retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Hawkes, Joanna Morris, Spela Bavcar, Craig Wilkie, Surajit Ray, Charlotte Auquier, Sarah Benjamin, Juan Borrego Massó, Sébastien Bottin, Owen Davies, Isabelle Desmas-Bazelle, Anat Einhorn, Celia Figueroa-Gonzalez, Katerina Holenova, Elisavet Kritsotalaki, Kerry Peak, Katherine Smallwood, Elisabetta Treggiari, Paola Valenti, Miguel Garcia de la Virgen, Quentin Fournier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvim.17222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Five hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>Our study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17222\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 for treatment of peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma in dogs: A European multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Background: Peripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared.
Objectives: Our primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes.
Animals: Five hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25.
Methods: Retrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021.
Results: The 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols.
Conclusions and clinical importance: Our study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.