腹主动脉瘤和胸主动脉瘤风险因素的差异。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.012
Sven-Erik Persson, Mari Holsti, Kevin Mani, Anders Wanhainen
{"title":"腹主动脉瘤和胸主动脉瘤风险因素的差异。","authors":"Sven-Erik Persson, Mari Holsti, Kevin Mani, Anders Wanhainen","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies suggest partly different risk factor profiles of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but prospective data are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim/objectives: </strong>The purpose of this prospective population-based case-control study was to investigate differences in risk factor profile between TAA and AAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in two prospective population-based studies, the Västerbotten Intervention Project (VIP) and the Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) study, between 1986 and 2010 underwent cardiovascular risk assessments, including blood samples, oral glucose tolerance test, blood pressure readings and a self-reported health questionnaire. All individuals who were later diagnosed with TAA or AAA were identified. Age, sex, and time-matched controls were selected from the same cohorts, aiming at four controls / case. Adjusted odds ratios for potential risk factors for later diagnosis of TAA and AAA respectively, were estimated by multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From total 96,196 individuals with prospectively collected data in the VIP/MONICA cohort, a total of 236 individuals with AAA (181 men and 55 women) and 935 matched controls, and 168 individuals with TAA (115 men and 53 women) and 662 controls were included. The average age at baseline examination was 57.0 ± 5.7 years for AAA cases and controls, and 52.1 ± 8.8 years for TAA cases and controls. Mean time between baseline examination and diagnosis of AAA/TAA was 12.1 and 11.7 years respectively. There was a clear difference in risk factor profile between AAA and TAA. Smoking, hypertension and coronary artery disease were significantly associated with later diagnosis of AAA with highest adjusted odds ratio for a history of smoking (OR 10.3, 95% CI 6.3-16.8). For TAA, hypertension was the only positive risk factor (OR 1.7, CI 1.1-2.7), while smoking was not associated. Diabetes was not associated with either AAA or TAA, neither was self-reported physical activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this prospective population-based case-control study risk factor profile differed between AAA and TAA. This suggests a partially different etiology for TAA and AAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference in Risk Factor profile for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.\",\"authors\":\"Sven-Erik Persson, Mari Holsti, Kevin Mani, Anders Wanhainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies suggest partly different risk factor profiles of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but prospective data are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim/objectives: </strong>The purpose of this prospective population-based case-control study was to investigate differences in risk factor profile between TAA and AAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in two prospective population-based studies, the Västerbotten Intervention Project (VIP) and the Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) study, between 1986 and 2010 underwent cardiovascular risk assessments, including blood samples, oral glucose tolerance test, blood pressure readings and a self-reported health questionnaire. All individuals who were later diagnosed with TAA or AAA were identified. Age, sex, and time-matched controls were selected from the same cohorts, aiming at four controls / case. Adjusted odds ratios for potential risk factors for later diagnosis of TAA and AAA respectively, were estimated by multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From total 96,196 individuals with prospectively collected data in the VIP/MONICA cohort, a total of 236 individuals with AAA (181 men and 55 women) and 935 matched controls, and 168 individuals with TAA (115 men and 53 women) and 662 controls were included. The average age at baseline examination was 57.0 ± 5.7 years for AAA cases and controls, and 52.1 ± 8.8 years for TAA cases and controls. Mean time between baseline examination and diagnosis of AAA/TAA was 12.1 and 11.7 years respectively. There was a clear difference in risk factor profile between AAA and TAA. Smoking, hypertension and coronary artery disease were significantly associated with later diagnosis of AAA with highest adjusted odds ratio for a history of smoking (OR 10.3, 95% CI 6.3-16.8). For TAA, hypertension was the only positive risk factor (OR 1.7, CI 1.1-2.7), while smoking was not associated. Diabetes was not associated with either AAA or TAA, neither was self-reported physical activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this prospective population-based case-control study risk factor profile differed between AAA and TAA. This suggests a partially different etiology for TAA and AAA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以前的研究表明,胸主动脉瘤(TAA)和腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的风险因素部分不同,但前瞻性数据很少:这项基于人群的前瞻性病例对照研究旨在调查TAA和AAA之间风险因素的差异:1986年至2010年期间,两项前瞻性人群研究(韦斯特博滕干预项目(VIP)和心血管疾病趋势和决定因素监测(MONICA)研究)的参与者接受了心血管风险评估,包括血样、口服葡萄糖耐量试验、血压读数和自我报告的健康问卷。所有后来被诊断为 TAA 或 AAA 的人都被确定了身份。从同一队列中选取年龄、性别和时间匹配的对照组,每例病例有四个对照组。通过多变量条件逻辑回归分析,分别估算出后来被诊断为TAA和AAA的潜在风险因素的调整几率比:VIP/MONICA队列共收集了96196人的前瞻性数据,其中包括236名AAA患者(181名男性和55名女性)和935名匹配对照者,以及168名TAA患者(115名男性和53名女性)和662名对照者。AAA 病例和对照组的基线检查平均年龄为 57.0 ± 5.7 岁,TAA 病例和对照组的基线检查平均年龄为 52.1 ± 8.8 岁。从基线检查到确诊 AAA/TAA 的平均时间分别为 12.1 年和 11.7 年。AAA 和 TAA 的风险因素有明显差异。吸烟、高血压和冠状动脉疾病与晚期诊断出 AAA 有明显相关性,其中吸烟史的调整赔率最高(OR 10.3,95% CI 6.3-16.8)。就 TAA 而言,高血压是唯一的阳性风险因素(OR 1.7,CI 1.1-2.7),而吸烟则与之无关。糖尿病与AAA或TAA均无关,自我报告的体育锻炼也与AAA或TAA无关:在这项基于人群的前瞻性病例对照研究中,AAA和TAA的风险因素不同。结论:在这项基于人群的前瞻性病例对照研究中,AAA 和 TAA 的风险因素不同,这表明 TAA 和 AAA 的病因部分不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Difference in Risk Factor profile for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.

Background: Previous studies suggest partly different risk factor profiles of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but prospective data are scarce.

Aim/objectives: The purpose of this prospective population-based case-control study was to investigate differences in risk factor profile between TAA and AAA.

Methods: Participants in two prospective population-based studies, the Västerbotten Intervention Project (VIP) and the Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) study, between 1986 and 2010 underwent cardiovascular risk assessments, including blood samples, oral glucose tolerance test, blood pressure readings and a self-reported health questionnaire. All individuals who were later diagnosed with TAA or AAA were identified. Age, sex, and time-matched controls were selected from the same cohorts, aiming at four controls / case. Adjusted odds ratios for potential risk factors for later diagnosis of TAA and AAA respectively, were estimated by multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses.

Results: From total 96,196 individuals with prospectively collected data in the VIP/MONICA cohort, a total of 236 individuals with AAA (181 men and 55 women) and 935 matched controls, and 168 individuals with TAA (115 men and 53 women) and 662 controls were included. The average age at baseline examination was 57.0 ± 5.7 years for AAA cases and controls, and 52.1 ± 8.8 years for TAA cases and controls. Mean time between baseline examination and diagnosis of AAA/TAA was 12.1 and 11.7 years respectively. There was a clear difference in risk factor profile between AAA and TAA. Smoking, hypertension and coronary artery disease were significantly associated with later diagnosis of AAA with highest adjusted odds ratio for a history of smoking (OR 10.3, 95% CI 6.3-16.8). For TAA, hypertension was the only positive risk factor (OR 1.7, CI 1.1-2.7), while smoking was not associated. Diabetes was not associated with either AAA or TAA, neither was self-reported physical activity.

Conclusions: In this prospective population-based case-control study risk factor profile differed between AAA and TAA. This suggests a partially different etiology for TAA and AAA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review to Examine the Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Revascularization for PAD, Carotid Artery Surgery and Aortic Aneurysm Repair Outcomes in the United States. French Multicentric Registry on LUMINOR Drug-Eluting Balloon for Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries. Outcomes of Prosthetic and Biological Grafts Compared to Arm Vein Grafts in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia. Whole aorta imaging shows increased risk for thoracic aortic aneurysms and dilatations in relatives of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients. Long-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular versus Open Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms in the VISION Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1