非侵入性成像技术诊断 MASLD 患者 MASH 的准确性:系统性综述。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Liver International Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1111/liv.16127
Jennifer Cathcart, Rachael Barrett, James S Bowness, Ashis Mukhopadhya, Ruairi Lynch, John F Dillon
{"title":"非侵入性成像技术诊断 MASLD 患者 MASH 的准确性:系统性综述。","authors":"Jennifer Cathcart, Rachael Barrett, James S Bowness, Ashis Mukhopadhya, Ruairi Lynch, John F Dillon","doi":"10.1111/liv.16127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing public health problem. The secondary stage in MASLD is steatohepatitis (MASH), the co-existence of steatosis and inflammation, a leading cause of progression to fibrosis and mortality. MASH resolution alone improves survival. Currently, MASH diagnosis is via liver biopsy. This study sought to evaluate the accuracy of imaging-based tests for MASH diagnosis, which offer a non-invasive method of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight academic literature databases were searched and references of previous systematic reviews and included papers were checked for additional papers. Liver biopsy was used for reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report on 69 imaging-based studies. There were 31 studies on MRI, 27 on ultrasound, five on CT, 13 on transient elastography, eight on controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and two on scintigraphy. The pathological definition of MASH was inconsistent, making it difficult to compare studies. 55/69 studies (79.71%) were deemed high-risk of bias as they had no preset thresholds and no validation. The two largest groups of imaging papers were on MRI and ultrasound. AUROCs were up to 0.93 for MRE, 0.90 for MRI, 1.0 for magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and 0.94 for ultrasound-based studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that the most promising imaging tools are MRI techniques or ultrasound-based scores and confirmed there is potential to utilise these for MASH diagnosis. However, many publications are single studies without independent prospective validation. Without this, there is no clear imaging tool or score currently available that is reliably tested to diagnose MASH.</p>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of MASH in Patients With MASLD: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Cathcart, Rachael Barrett, James S Bowness, Ashis Mukhopadhya, Ruairi Lynch, John F Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/liv.16127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing public health problem. The secondary stage in MASLD is steatohepatitis (MASH), the co-existence of steatosis and inflammation, a leading cause of progression to fibrosis and mortality. MASH resolution alone improves survival. Currently, MASH diagnosis is via liver biopsy. This study sought to evaluate the accuracy of imaging-based tests for MASH diagnosis, which offer a non-invasive method of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight academic literature databases were searched and references of previous systematic reviews and included papers were checked for additional papers. Liver biopsy was used for reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report on 69 imaging-based studies. There were 31 studies on MRI, 27 on ultrasound, five on CT, 13 on transient elastography, eight on controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and two on scintigraphy. The pathological definition of MASH was inconsistent, making it difficult to compare studies. 55/69 studies (79.71%) were deemed high-risk of bias as they had no preset thresholds and no validation. The two largest groups of imaging papers were on MRI and ultrasound. AUROCs were up to 0.93 for MRE, 0.90 for MRI, 1.0 for magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and 0.94 for ultrasound-based studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that the most promising imaging tools are MRI techniques or ultrasound-based scores and confirmed there is potential to utilise these for MASH diagnosis. However, many publications are single studies without independent prospective validation. Without this, there is no clear imaging tool or score currently available that is reliably tested to diagnose MASH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.16127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.16127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。脂肪性肝病的第二阶段是脂肪性肝炎(MASH),即脂肪变性和炎症并存,是导致肝纤维化和死亡的主要原因。单单解决 MASH 问题就能提高生存率。目前,MASH 的诊断主要通过肝活检。本研究旨在评估基于成像的 MASH 诊断测试的准确性,这种测试提供了一种无创诊断方法:方法:检索了八个学术文献数据库,并查阅了以往系统综述和纳入论文的参考文献。结果:我们报告了 69 项基于成像的研究:我们报告了 69 项基于影像学的研究。其中31项研究基于核磁共振成像,27项研究基于超声波,5项研究基于CT,13项研究基于瞬态弹性成像,8项研究基于受控衰减参数(CAP),2项研究基于闪烁成像。MASH的病理定义不一致,因此很难对研究进行比较。55/69项研究(79.71%)被认为存在高偏倚风险,因为它们没有预设阈值,也没有经过验证。最大的两组成像论文涉及核磁共振成像和超声波。MRE的AUROC高达0.93,MRI为0.90,磁共振波谱(MRS)为1.0,超声研究为0.94:我们的研究发现,最有前途的成像工具是核磁共振成像技术或基于超声波的评分,并证实了利用这些工具诊断 MASH 的潜力。然而,许多出版物都是单一研究,没有经过独立的前瞻性验证。因此,目前还没有明确的成像工具或评分可用于诊断 MASH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of MASH in Patients With MASLD: A Systematic Review.

Background and aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing public health problem. The secondary stage in MASLD is steatohepatitis (MASH), the co-existence of steatosis and inflammation, a leading cause of progression to fibrosis and mortality. MASH resolution alone improves survival. Currently, MASH diagnosis is via liver biopsy. This study sought to evaluate the accuracy of imaging-based tests for MASH diagnosis, which offer a non-invasive method of diagnosis.

Methods: Eight academic literature databases were searched and references of previous systematic reviews and included papers were checked for additional papers. Liver biopsy was used for reference standard.

Results: We report on 69 imaging-based studies. There were 31 studies on MRI, 27 on ultrasound, five on CT, 13 on transient elastography, eight on controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and two on scintigraphy. The pathological definition of MASH was inconsistent, making it difficult to compare studies. 55/69 studies (79.71%) were deemed high-risk of bias as they had no preset thresholds and no validation. The two largest groups of imaging papers were on MRI and ultrasound. AUROCs were up to 0.93 for MRE, 0.90 for MRI, 1.0 for magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and 0.94 for ultrasound-based studies.

Conclusions: Our study found that the most promising imaging tools are MRI techniques or ultrasound-based scores and confirmed there is potential to utilise these for MASH diagnosis. However, many publications are single studies without independent prospective validation. Without this, there is no clear imaging tool or score currently available that is reliably tested to diagnose MASH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liver International
Liver International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
348
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Erythropoietic protoporphyrias: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management". Interpreting elevated liver blood test results through a genetic lens: A genome-wide association study. The Relationship Between Ferroptosis and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Association of Liver Disease and Chronic Pruritus: A Case-Control Study. Impact of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy on All-Cause Mortality in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1