血清神经丝光对一家三级多发性硬化症诊所临床决策的影响。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1177/13524585241277044
Zoë Ygj van Lierop, Mark Hj Wessels, Womei Ml Lekranty, Bastiaan Moraal, Sam N Hof, Laura Hogenboom, Brigit A de Jong, Nandi Meijs, Liselore A Mensing, Bob W van Oosten, Nik Sol, Zoé LE van Kempen, Lisa Vermunt, Myrthe J Willems, Eva Mm Strijbis, Bernard Mj Uitdehaag, Joep Killestein, Charlotte E Teunissen
{"title":"血清神经丝光对一家三级多发性硬化症诊所临床决策的影响。","authors":"Zoë Ygj van Lierop, Mark Hj Wessels, Womei Ml Lekranty, Bastiaan Moraal, Sam N Hof, Laura Hogenboom, Brigit A de Jong, Nandi Meijs, Liselore A Mensing, Bob W van Oosten, Nik Sol, Zoé LE van Kempen, Lisa Vermunt, Myrthe J Willems, Eva Mm Strijbis, Bernard Mj Uitdehaag, Joep Killestein, Charlotte E Teunissen","doi":"10.1177/13524585241277044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021-December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: \"DMT monitoring\" (55%), \"new symptoms\" (18%), \"differential diagnosis\" (17%), and \"DMT baseline\" (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context \"new symptoms\" (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Certainty increased (<i>p</i> = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context \"differential diagnosis\" (<i>p</i> < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context \"new symptoms\" (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1620-1629"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Zoë Ygj van Lierop, Mark Hj Wessels, Womei Ml Lekranty, Bastiaan Moraal, Sam N Hof, Laura Hogenboom, Brigit A de Jong, Nandi Meijs, Liselore A Mensing, Bob W van Oosten, Nik Sol, Zoé LE van Kempen, Lisa Vermunt, Myrthe J Willems, Eva Mm Strijbis, Bernard Mj Uitdehaag, Joep Killestein, Charlotte E Teunissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585241277044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021-December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: \\\"DMT monitoring\\\" (55%), \\\"new symptoms\\\" (18%), \\\"differential diagnosis\\\" (17%), and \\\"DMT baseline\\\" (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context \\\"new symptoms\\\" (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Certainty increased (<i>p</i> = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context \\\"differential diagnosis\\\" (<i>p</i> < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context \\\"new symptoms\\\" (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1620-1629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241277044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241277044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:血清神经丝蛋白光(sNfL)是多发性硬化症(MS)神经轴损害的生物标志物。临床应用仍然有限。我们在阿姆斯特丹多发性硬化症中心(MS Center Amsterdam)的一家三级门诊诊所使用调查问卷调查了实施对临床决策的影响。结果:对 166 个病例(年龄为 41 ± 12 岁,68% 为女性,64% 使用疾病修饰疗法 (DMT))的 sNfL 进行了评估,具体情况如下:"DMT监测"(55%)、"新症状"(18%)、"鉴别诊断"(17%)和 "DMT基线"(11%)。有 19.3% 的病例在披露后改变了临床决定,尤其是在 "新症状"(38%)和 sNfL 水平较高的情况下(β = 0.03,p = 0.04)。确定性增加(p = 0.004),而对 MRI 活动的期望则随着低 sNfL 水平的披露而降低(p = 0.01)。在 "鉴别诊断 "情境中,动机最高(p < 0.001);在 "新症状 "情境中,感知价值和紧迫性最高(p = 0.02):在这项研究中,sNfL 的实施对临床决策和确定性有相当大的影响。标准的实施可能会对患者护理起到补充作用,但在不同的临床环境中还需谨慎和更多的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic.

Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic.

Methods: sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021-December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL.

Results: sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: "DMT monitoring" (55%), "new symptoms" (18%), "differential diagnosis" (17%), and "DMT baseline" (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context "new symptoms" (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context "differential diagnosis" (p < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context "new symptoms" (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
期刊最新文献
Cryptogenic organising pneumonia in patients treated with ocrelizumab. Ocrelizumab-associated cryptogenic organizing pneumonia in multiple sclerosis: Two case reports and comprehensive literature review. Vaccination as a risk factor for pediatric multiple sclerosis: Insights from a retrospective case-control study. Secondary organising pneumonia associated to COVID-19 infection in patients with central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating diseases treated with anti-CD20 therapies. Development and initial validation of the Cognitive Change Scale (CCS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1