{"title":"经颅磁刺激和生物反馈对多发性硬化症患者膀胱过度活动症影响的比较研究:随机临床试验。","authors":"Osama M Abdel Raheem, Doaa A Abdel-Hady","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07788-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common clinical presentation in patients with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and biofeedback on overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research included 45 individuals with multiple sclerosis of both sexes. We randomly divided them into three equal groups (A, B, and C). Patients in group A got biofeedback training and pelvic floor exercise (PFME); patients in group B had transcranial magnetic treatment and PFME; and patients in group C had PFME. Urodynamic measurements were utilized to determine bladder parameters (detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate, bladder volume at initial desire to empty, maximum cystometric capacity, detrusor pressure, and maximum flow rate) for all groups before and after a six-week training interval (the end of therapy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant improvement in all urodynamic measurement parameters within the groups (Groups A, B and C). Except for the maximal cystometric capacity and detrusor pressure were non-significant improvement in B before and after therapy. However, there was no significant difference between the three groups following therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transcranial magnetic stimulation and biofeedback improved bladder function in patients with multiple sclerosis. These approaches have a high level of safety and effectiveness, but EMG biofeedback has superiority.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1291-1299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study on the Impact of Transcranial Magnetic stimulation and Bio-feedback on overactive bladder in multiple sclerosis patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Osama M Abdel Raheem, Doaa A Abdel-Hady\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-024-07788-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common clinical presentation in patients with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and biofeedback on overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research included 45 individuals with multiple sclerosis of both sexes. We randomly divided them into three equal groups (A, B, and C). Patients in group A got biofeedback training and pelvic floor exercise (PFME); patients in group B had transcranial magnetic treatment and PFME; and patients in group C had PFME. Urodynamic measurements were utilized to determine bladder parameters (detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate, bladder volume at initial desire to empty, maximum cystometric capacity, detrusor pressure, and maximum flow rate) for all groups before and after a six-week training interval (the end of therapy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant improvement in all urodynamic measurement parameters within the groups (Groups A, B and C). Except for the maximal cystometric capacity and detrusor pressure were non-significant improvement in B before and after therapy. However, there was no significant difference between the three groups following therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transcranial magnetic stimulation and biofeedback improved bladder function in patients with multiple sclerosis. These approaches have a high level of safety and effectiveness, but EMG biofeedback has superiority.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1291-1299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828820/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07788-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07788-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:膀胱过度活动症(OAB)是多发性硬化症患者的常见临床表现:膀胱过度活动症(OAB)是多发性硬化症患者的常见临床表现:本研究旨在比较经颅磁刺激(TMS)和生物反馈对多发性硬化症患者膀胱过度活动症的影响:研究对象包括 45 名多发性硬化症患者,男女不限。我们将他们随机分为三组(A、B、C)。A 组患者接受生物反馈训练和盆底肌锻炼(PFME);B 组患者接受经颅磁治疗和盆底肌锻炼;C 组患者接受盆底肌锻炼。在为期六周的训练间隔(治疗结束)之前和之后,对所有组别进行了尿动力学测量,以确定膀胱参数(最大流速时的逼尿肌压力、初始排空欲望时的膀胱容量、最大膀胱容量、逼尿肌压力和最大流速):各组(A 组、B 组和 C 组)的所有尿动力学测量参数均有明显改善。除了最大膀胱容量和逼尿肌压力在治疗前后没有明显改善外,其他指标在 B 组均有明显改善。结论:经颅磁刺激和生物治疗在治疗前和治疗后均有显著改善:结论:经颅磁刺激和生物反馈可改善多发性硬化症患者的膀胱功能。结论:经颅磁刺激和生物反馈疗法可改善多发性硬化症患者的膀胱功能,这两种方法具有较高的安全性和有效性,但肌电图生物反馈疗法更具优势。
Comparative study on the Impact of Transcranial Magnetic stimulation and Bio-feedback on overactive bladder in multiple sclerosis patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common clinical presentation in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and biofeedback on overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Methods: This research included 45 individuals with multiple sclerosis of both sexes. We randomly divided them into three equal groups (A, B, and C). Patients in group A got biofeedback training and pelvic floor exercise (PFME); patients in group B had transcranial magnetic treatment and PFME; and patients in group C had PFME. Urodynamic measurements were utilized to determine bladder parameters (detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate, bladder volume at initial desire to empty, maximum cystometric capacity, detrusor pressure, and maximum flow rate) for all groups before and after a six-week training interval (the end of therapy).
Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in all urodynamic measurement parameters within the groups (Groups A, B and C). Except for the maximal cystometric capacity and detrusor pressure were non-significant improvement in B before and after therapy. However, there was no significant difference between the three groups following therapy.
Conclusion: Transcranial magnetic stimulation and biofeedback improved bladder function in patients with multiple sclerosis. These approaches have a high level of safety and effectiveness, but EMG biofeedback has superiority.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.