未经刺激的 IFN-γ (IRISA-TB) 对胸膜结核的诊断性能:南非和印度的前瞻性研究。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae533
Devasahayam J Christopher, Aliasgar Esmail, Alex J Scott, Lindsay Wilson, Philippa Randall, Balamugesh Thangakunam, Deepa Shankar, Sekar Rajasekar, Christhunesa S Christudass, Louié Kühn, Jeremi Swanepoel, Tahlia Perumal, Anil Pooran, Suzette Oelofse, Keertan Dheda
{"title":"未经刺激的 IFN-γ (IRISA-TB) 对胸膜结核的诊断性能:南非和印度的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Devasahayam J Christopher, Aliasgar Esmail, Alex J Scott, Lindsay Wilson, Philippa Randall, Balamugesh Thangakunam, Deepa Shankar, Sekar Rajasekar, Christhunesa S Christudass, Louié Kühn, Jeremi Swanepoel, Tahlia Perumal, Anil Pooran, Suzette Oelofse, Keertan Dheda","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is the most common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in many settings. The diagnostic performance of the frontline polymerase chain reaction-based GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) remains suboptimal (sensitivity of ∼30%), but data are limited. Improved diagnostic approaches are urgently needed to detect extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in tuberculosis (TB)-endemic settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective cohort study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a rapid (same-day) interferon gamma rapid immunosuspension assay (IRISA-TB) in patients with presumed TPE from South Africa and India. Participants underwent pleural biopsy, and testing with other available same-day diagnostic assays (adenosine deaminase [ADA], Xpert Ultra, and IRISA-TB) was concurrently undertaken. The reference standard for TB was microbiological and/or histopathological confirmation using pleural fluid and/or pleural biopsy samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 participants with presumed TPE were recruited (106 from South Africa, 111 from India). The sensitivity of IRISA-TB (cut-point 20.5 pg/mL) was significantly better than that of Xpert Ultra (81.8% [70.4-90.2] vs 32.9% [22.1-45.1]; <i>P</i> < .001) and ADA at the 40 IU/mL cut-point used in India (81.8% [70.4-90.2] vs 53.8% [41.0-66.3]; <i>P</i>  <i>=</i> .002). Compared with ADA at the 30 IU/mL cut-point used in South Africa, IRISA-TB had a higher specificity (96.6% [90.3-99.3] vs 87.1% [78.6-93.2]) and a higher positive predictive value (94.7% [85.5-97.3] vs 81.8% [72.4-88.5]). The negative predictive value (NPV; rule-out value) of IRISA-TB was significantly better than that of Xpert Ultra (87.5% [83.2-93.0] vs 64.9% [61.1-68.6]; <i>P</i> < .001) and ADA at the 40 IU/mL cut-point (87.5% [83.2-93.0] vs 74.1% [68.7-79.0]; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IRISA-TB demonstrated markedly better sensitivity and NPV than Xpert Ultra and excellent specificity for the diagnosis of TPE. These data have implications for clinical practice in TB-endemic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"11 10","pages":"ofae533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Unstimulated IFN-γ (IRISA-TB) for Pleural Tuberculosis: A Prospective Study in South Africa and India.\",\"authors\":\"Devasahayam J Christopher, Aliasgar Esmail, Alex J Scott, Lindsay Wilson, Philippa Randall, Balamugesh Thangakunam, Deepa Shankar, Sekar Rajasekar, Christhunesa S Christudass, Louié Kühn, Jeremi Swanepoel, Tahlia Perumal, Anil Pooran, Suzette Oelofse, Keertan Dheda\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofae533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is the most common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in many settings. The diagnostic performance of the frontline polymerase chain reaction-based GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) remains suboptimal (sensitivity of ∼30%), but data are limited. Improved diagnostic approaches are urgently needed to detect extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in tuberculosis (TB)-endemic settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective cohort study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a rapid (same-day) interferon gamma rapid immunosuspension assay (IRISA-TB) in patients with presumed TPE from South Africa and India. Participants underwent pleural biopsy, and testing with other available same-day diagnostic assays (adenosine deaminase [ADA], Xpert Ultra, and IRISA-TB) was concurrently undertaken. The reference standard for TB was microbiological and/or histopathological confirmation using pleural fluid and/or pleural biopsy samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 participants with presumed TPE were recruited (106 from South Africa, 111 from India). The sensitivity of IRISA-TB (cut-point 20.5 pg/mL) was significantly better than that of Xpert Ultra (81.8% [70.4-90.2] vs 32.9% [22.1-45.1]; <i>P</i> < .001) and ADA at the 40 IU/mL cut-point used in India (81.8% [70.4-90.2] vs 53.8% [41.0-66.3]; <i>P</i>  <i>=</i> .002). Compared with ADA at the 30 IU/mL cut-point used in South Africa, IRISA-TB had a higher specificity (96.6% [90.3-99.3] vs 87.1% [78.6-93.2]) and a higher positive predictive value (94.7% [85.5-97.3] vs 81.8% [72.4-88.5]). The negative predictive value (NPV; rule-out value) of IRISA-TB was significantly better than that of Xpert Ultra (87.5% [83.2-93.0] vs 64.9% [61.1-68.6]; <i>P</i> < .001) and ADA at the 40 IU/mL cut-point (87.5% [83.2-93.0] vs 74.1% [68.7-79.0]; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IRISA-TB demonstrated markedly better sensitivity and NPV than Xpert Ultra and excellent specificity for the diagnosis of TPE. These data have implications for clinical practice in TB-endemic settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"ofae533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489880/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结核性胸腔积液(TPE)是许多环境中最常见的肺外结核形式。基于聚合酶链反应的 GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra(Xpert Ultra)的一线诊断性能仍不理想(灵敏度为 30%),但数据有限。在结核病(TB)流行的环境中,迫切需要改进诊断方法来检测肺外结核病(EPTB):这项多中心、前瞻性队列研究评估了快速(当天)γ干扰素快速免疫悬浮检测法(IRISA-TB)在南非和印度推定肺结核患者中的诊断效果。参试者接受了胸膜活检,并同时接受了其他可用的当天诊断测定(腺苷脱氨酶 [ADA]、Xpert Ultra 和 IRISA-TB)的检测。结核病的参考标准是使用胸腔积液和/或胸膜活检样本进行微生物学和/或组织病理学确认:结果:共招募了 217 名推测为 TPE 的参与者(其中 106 人来自南非,111 人来自印度)。IRISA-TB(切点 20.5 pg/mL)的灵敏度明显优于 Xpert Ultra(81.8% [70.4-90.2] vs 32.9% [22.1-45.1];P < .001)和印度使用的切点为 40 IU/mL 的 ADA(81.8% [70.4-90.2] vs 53.8% [41.0-66.3];P = .002)。与南非使用的 30 IU/mL 切点 ADA 相比,IRISA-TB 的特异性更高(96.6% [90.3-99.3] vs 87.1% [78.6-93.2]),阳性预测值更高(94.7% [85.5-97.3] vs 81.8% [72.4-88.5])。IRISA-TB 的阴性预测值(NPV;排除值)明显优于 Xpert Ultra(87.5% [83.2-93.0] vs 64.9% [61.1-68.6];P < .001)和 40 IU/mL 切点的 ADA(87.5% [83.2-93.0] vs 74.1% [68.7-79.0];P < .001):IRISA-TB对TPE诊断的灵敏度和NPV明显优于Xpert Ultra,特异性也非常好。这些数据对结核病流行地区的临床实践具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Performance of Unstimulated IFN-γ (IRISA-TB) for Pleural Tuberculosis: A Prospective Study in South Africa and India.

Background: Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is the most common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in many settings. The diagnostic performance of the frontline polymerase chain reaction-based GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) remains suboptimal (sensitivity of ∼30%), but data are limited. Improved diagnostic approaches are urgently needed to detect extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in tuberculosis (TB)-endemic settings.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a rapid (same-day) interferon gamma rapid immunosuspension assay (IRISA-TB) in patients with presumed TPE from South Africa and India. Participants underwent pleural biopsy, and testing with other available same-day diagnostic assays (adenosine deaminase [ADA], Xpert Ultra, and IRISA-TB) was concurrently undertaken. The reference standard for TB was microbiological and/or histopathological confirmation using pleural fluid and/or pleural biopsy samples.

Results: A total of 217 participants with presumed TPE were recruited (106 from South Africa, 111 from India). The sensitivity of IRISA-TB (cut-point 20.5 pg/mL) was significantly better than that of Xpert Ultra (81.8% [70.4-90.2] vs 32.9% [22.1-45.1]; P < .001) and ADA at the 40 IU/mL cut-point used in India (81.8% [70.4-90.2] vs 53.8% [41.0-66.3]; P  = .002). Compared with ADA at the 30 IU/mL cut-point used in South Africa, IRISA-TB had a higher specificity (96.6% [90.3-99.3] vs 87.1% [78.6-93.2]) and a higher positive predictive value (94.7% [85.5-97.3] vs 81.8% [72.4-88.5]). The negative predictive value (NPV; rule-out value) of IRISA-TB was significantly better than that of Xpert Ultra (87.5% [83.2-93.0] vs 64.9% [61.1-68.6]; P < .001) and ADA at the 40 IU/mL cut-point (87.5% [83.2-93.0] vs 74.1% [68.7-79.0]; P < .001).

Conclusions: IRISA-TB demonstrated markedly better sensitivity and NPV than Xpert Ultra and excellent specificity for the diagnosis of TPE. These data have implications for clinical practice in TB-endemic settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Enterovirus D68: Genomic and Clinical Comparison of 2 Seasons of Increased Viral Circulation and Discrepant Incidence of Acute Flaccid Myelitis-Maryland, USA. Early Mortality and Health Care Costs in Patients Recently Diagnosed With Kaposi Sarcoma at the National Cancer Institute, Mexico City. Gut Microbiome in Human Melioidosis: Composition and Resistome Dynamics from Diagnosis to Discovery. Breakthrough Rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections After Meningococcal B Vaccination: Microbiological and Clinical Features. Lack of Detection of Norwalk Virus in Saliva Samples From a Controlled Human Infection Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1