臂外侧游离皮瓣的适应症、术后效果和并发症:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006247
Edward T C Dong, Jérôme Martineau, Daniel F Kalbermatten, Carlo M Oranges
{"title":"臂外侧游离皮瓣的适应症、术后效果和并发症:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Edward T C Dong, Jérôme Martineau, Daniel F Kalbermatten, Carlo M Oranges","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lateral arm free flap (LA-FF) has become an increasingly popular choice in the reconstruction of soft tissue defect in many anatomical regions. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding its safety and efficacy. The aim of this study is to analyze its different applications along with their surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review including all studies assessing the surgical outcomes of the LA-FF and proportional meta-analysis using a random-effect DerSimonian-Laird model was performed to assess the postsurgical complications and flap failures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five articles were included in the final analysis, representing a total of 1272 flaps in 1256 patients. Indications were mainly defects following tumoral resection and trauma. Across the different studies, the reported flap size range varied from 2 × 4 cm to 12 × 16 cm. The overall pooled flap failure rate across all indications was 3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.04], with a pooled failure rate of 2% (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) in the head and neck region, 3% (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) in the upper limb region, and 3% (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) in studies evaluating its use in different anatomical locations. The overall donor site complication rate was 11% (95% CI, 0.03-0.21), with no major complications described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates safety and efficacy of the LA-FF in reconstructing moderate to large soft tissue defects. It is mainly used for head and neck posttumoral resection and upper and lower limb posttraumatic reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"12 10","pages":"e6247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indications, Postoperative Outcomes, and Complications of the Lateral Arm Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Edward T C Dong, Jérôme Martineau, Daniel F Kalbermatten, Carlo M Oranges\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lateral arm free flap (LA-FF) has become an increasingly popular choice in the reconstruction of soft tissue defect in many anatomical regions. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding its safety and efficacy. The aim of this study is to analyze its different applications along with their surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review including all studies assessing the surgical outcomes of the LA-FF and proportional meta-analysis using a random-effect DerSimonian-Laird model was performed to assess the postsurgical complications and flap failures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five articles were included in the final analysis, representing a total of 1272 flaps in 1256 patients. Indications were mainly defects following tumoral resection and trauma. Across the different studies, the reported flap size range varied from 2 × 4 cm to 12 × 16 cm. The overall pooled flap failure rate across all indications was 3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.04], with a pooled failure rate of 2% (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) in the head and neck region, 3% (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) in the upper limb region, and 3% (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) in studies evaluating its use in different anatomical locations. The overall donor site complication rate was 11% (95% CI, 0.03-0.21), with no major complications described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates safety and efficacy of the LA-FF in reconstructing moderate to large soft tissue defects. It is mainly used for head and neck posttumoral resection and upper and lower limb posttraumatic reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"e6247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469903/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外侧臂游离皮瓣(LA-FF)在许多解剖区域的软组织缺损重建中越来越受欢迎。然而,有关其安全性和有效性的文献却很少。本研究旨在分析其不同应用及其手术效果:方法:采用随机效应 DerSimonian-Laird 模型对所有评估 LA-FF 手术效果的研究进行系统性综述和比例荟萃分析,以评估手术后并发症和皮瓣失败情况:25篇文章被纳入最终分析,代表了1256名患者的1272个皮瓣。适应症主要是肿瘤切除后的缺损和创伤。不同研究报告的皮瓣大小从 2 × 4 厘米到 12 × 16 厘米不等。所有适应症的总皮瓣失败率为3%[95%置信区间(CI),0.01-0.04],头颈部的总失败率为2%(95% CI,0.01-0.04),上肢的总失败率为3%(95% CI,0.01-0.06),在评估不同解剖位置使用皮瓣的研究中,总失败率为3%(95% CI,0.01-0.06)。供体部位的总体并发症发生率为11%(95% CI,0.03-0.21),无重大并发症:这项荟萃分析表明,LA-FF 在重建中度至大面积软组织缺损方面具有安全性和有效性。它主要用于头颈部肿瘤切除术后和上下肢创伤后重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indications, Postoperative Outcomes, and Complications of the Lateral Arm Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The lateral arm free flap (LA-FF) has become an increasingly popular choice in the reconstruction of soft tissue defect in many anatomical regions. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding its safety and efficacy. The aim of this study is to analyze its different applications along with their surgical outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review including all studies assessing the surgical outcomes of the LA-FF and proportional meta-analysis using a random-effect DerSimonian-Laird model was performed to assess the postsurgical complications and flap failures.

Results: Twenty-five articles were included in the final analysis, representing a total of 1272 flaps in 1256 patients. Indications were mainly defects following tumoral resection and trauma. Across the different studies, the reported flap size range varied from 2 × 4 cm to 12 × 16 cm. The overall pooled flap failure rate across all indications was 3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.04], with a pooled failure rate of 2% (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) in the head and neck region, 3% (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) in the upper limb region, and 3% (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) in studies evaluating its use in different anatomical locations. The overall donor site complication rate was 11% (95% CI, 0.03-0.21), with no major complications described.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates safety and efficacy of the LA-FF in reconstructing moderate to large soft tissue defects. It is mainly used for head and neck posttumoral resection and upper and lower limb posttraumatic reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
Clinically Applied Biomechanics of Mesh-reinforced Ventral Hernia Repair: A Practical Review. New Findings in Prominent Lower Eyelid Fat Pads Possibly Contributing to Their Etiology: Two Prospective Studies. Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Limited Fasciectomy for Dupuytren Disease: A Linear Model Assessment of Short-term Efficacy. Rapid-printed Three-dimensional Models for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma. Surgery With Peripheral Nerve Block Under Dexmedetomidine Sedation for Foot Ulcer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1