低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查中的肺结节管理:从 NELSON 试验中汲取的教训。

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.240535
Danrong Zhong, Grigory Sidorenkov, Colin Jacobs, Pim A de Jong, Hester A Gietema, Ralph Stadhouders, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Joachim G Aerts, Mathias Prokop, Harry J M Groen, Geertruida H de Bock, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Marjolein A Heuvelmans
{"title":"低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查中的肺结节管理:从 NELSON 试验中汲取的教训。","authors":"Danrong Zhong, Grigory Sidorenkov, Colin Jacobs, Pim A de Jong, Hester A Gietema, Ralph Stadhouders, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Joachim G Aerts, Mathias Prokop, Harry J M Groen, Geertruida H de Bock, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Marjolein A Heuvelmans","doi":"10.1148/radiol.240535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) in a high-risk population, as defined by age and smoking behavior, reduces lung cancer-related mortality. However, LDCT screening presents a major challenge. Numerous, mostly benign, nodules are seen in the lungs during screening. The question is how to distinguish the malignant from the benign nodules. Various studies use different protocols for nodule management. The Dutch-Belgian NELSON (Nederlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek) trial, the largest European lung cancer screening trial, used distinctions based on nodule volumetric assessment and growth rate. This review discusses key findings from the NELSON study regarding the characteristics of screening-detected nodules, including nodule size and its volumetric assessment, growth rate, subtype, and their associated malignancy risk. These results are compared with findings from other screening studies and current recommendations for lung nodule management. By examining differences in nodule management strategies and providing a comprehensive overview of outcomes specific to lung cancer screening, this review aims to contribute to the broader discussion on optimizing lung nodule management in screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"313 1","pages":"e240535"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung Nodule Management in Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Lessons from the NELSON Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Danrong Zhong, Grigory Sidorenkov, Colin Jacobs, Pim A de Jong, Hester A Gietema, Ralph Stadhouders, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Joachim G Aerts, Mathias Prokop, Harry J M Groen, Geertruida H de Bock, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Marjolein A Heuvelmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/radiol.240535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) in a high-risk population, as defined by age and smoking behavior, reduces lung cancer-related mortality. However, LDCT screening presents a major challenge. Numerous, mostly benign, nodules are seen in the lungs during screening. The question is how to distinguish the malignant from the benign nodules. Various studies use different protocols for nodule management. The Dutch-Belgian NELSON (Nederlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek) trial, the largest European lung cancer screening trial, used distinctions based on nodule volumetric assessment and growth rate. This review discusses key findings from the NELSON study regarding the characteristics of screening-detected nodules, including nodule size and its volumetric assessment, growth rate, subtype, and their associated malignancy risk. These results are compared with findings from other screening studies and current recommendations for lung nodule management. By examining differences in nodule management strategies and providing a comprehensive overview of outcomes specific to lung cancer screening, this review aims to contribute to the broader discussion on optimizing lung nodule management in screening programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology\",\"volume\":\"313 1\",\"pages\":\"e240535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.240535\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.240535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据年龄和吸烟行为对高危人群进行低剂量 CT(LDCT)筛查可降低肺癌相关死亡率。然而,低剂量 CT 筛查是一项重大挑战。在筛查过程中,肺部会出现许多结节,其中大部分是良性的。问题是如何区分恶性和良性结节。不同的研究采用了不同的结节处理方案。荷兰-比利时 NELSON(Nederlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek)试验是欧洲最大的肺癌筛查试验,该试验根据结节体积评估和生长率来区分结节。本综述讨论了 NELSON 研究中关于筛查出的结节特征的主要发现,包括结节大小及其体积评估、生长率、亚型及其相关恶性风险。这些结果将与其他筛查研究的结果和当前的肺结节管理建议进行比较。通过研究结节管理策略的差异并全面概述肺癌筛查的具体结果,本综述旨在为更广泛地讨论优化筛查项目中的肺结节管理做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lung Nodule Management in Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Lessons from the NELSON Trial.

Screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) in a high-risk population, as defined by age and smoking behavior, reduces lung cancer-related mortality. However, LDCT screening presents a major challenge. Numerous, mostly benign, nodules are seen in the lungs during screening. The question is how to distinguish the malignant from the benign nodules. Various studies use different protocols for nodule management. The Dutch-Belgian NELSON (Nederlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek) trial, the largest European lung cancer screening trial, used distinctions based on nodule volumetric assessment and growth rate. This review discusses key findings from the NELSON study regarding the characteristics of screening-detected nodules, including nodule size and its volumetric assessment, growth rate, subtype, and their associated malignancy risk. These results are compared with findings from other screening studies and current recommendations for lung nodule management. By examining differences in nodule management strategies and providing a comprehensive overview of outcomes specific to lung cancer screening, this review aims to contribute to the broader discussion on optimizing lung nodule management in screening programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors for Pneumothorax Following Lung Biopsy: Another Peek at Air Leak. Sex-specific Associations between Left Ventricular Remodeling at MRI and Long-term Cardiovascular Risk. The Clinical Weight of Left Ventricular Mass and Shape. Assessment of Nonmass Lesions Detected with Screening Breast US Based on Mammographic Findings. CT-guided Coaxial Lung Biopsy: Number of Cores and Association with Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1