A Lina Heinzke, Barbara Zdrazil, Paul D Leeson, Robert J Young, Axel Pahl, Herbert Waldmann, Andrew R Leach
{"title":"化合物-目标对数据集:药物、临床候选药物和其他生物活性化合物之间的差异。","authors":"A Lina Heinzke, Barbara Zdrazil, Paul D Leeson, Robert J Young, Axel Pahl, Herbert Waldmann, Andrew R Leach","doi":"10.1038/s41597-024-03582-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Providing a better understanding of what makes a compound a successful drug candidate is crucial for reducing the high attrition rates in drug discovery. Analyses of the differences between active compounds, clinical candidates and drugs require high-quality datasets. However, most datasets of drug discovery programs are not openly available. This work introduces a dataset of compound-target pairs extracted from the open-source bioactivity database ChEMBL (release 32). Compound-target pairs in the dataset either have at least one measured activity or are part of the manually curated set of known interactions in ChEMBL. Known interactions between drugs or clinical candidates and targets are specifically annotated to facilitate analyses of differences between drugs, clinical candidates, and other active compounds. In total, the dataset comprises 614,594 compound-target pairs, 5,109 (3,932) of which are known interactions between drugs (clinical candidates) and targets. The extraction is performed in an automated manner and fully reproducible. We are providing not only the datasets but also the code to rerun the analyses with other ChEMBL releases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21597,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Data","volume":"11 1","pages":"1160"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A compound-target pairs dataset: differences between drugs, clinical candidates and other bioactive compounds.\",\"authors\":\"A Lina Heinzke, Barbara Zdrazil, Paul D Leeson, Robert J Young, Axel Pahl, Herbert Waldmann, Andrew R Leach\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41597-024-03582-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Providing a better understanding of what makes a compound a successful drug candidate is crucial for reducing the high attrition rates in drug discovery. Analyses of the differences between active compounds, clinical candidates and drugs require high-quality datasets. However, most datasets of drug discovery programs are not openly available. This work introduces a dataset of compound-target pairs extracted from the open-source bioactivity database ChEMBL (release 32). Compound-target pairs in the dataset either have at least one measured activity or are part of the manually curated set of known interactions in ChEMBL. Known interactions between drugs or clinical candidates and targets are specifically annotated to facilitate analyses of differences between drugs, clinical candidates, and other active compounds. In total, the dataset comprises 614,594 compound-target pairs, 5,109 (3,932) of which are known interactions between drugs (clinical candidates) and targets. The extraction is performed in an automated manner and fully reproducible. We are providing not only the datasets but also the code to rerun the analyses with other ChEMBL releases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Data\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"1160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03582-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Data","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03582-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A compound-target pairs dataset: differences between drugs, clinical candidates and other bioactive compounds.
Providing a better understanding of what makes a compound a successful drug candidate is crucial for reducing the high attrition rates in drug discovery. Analyses of the differences between active compounds, clinical candidates and drugs require high-quality datasets. However, most datasets of drug discovery programs are not openly available. This work introduces a dataset of compound-target pairs extracted from the open-source bioactivity database ChEMBL (release 32). Compound-target pairs in the dataset either have at least one measured activity or are part of the manually curated set of known interactions in ChEMBL. Known interactions between drugs or clinical candidates and targets are specifically annotated to facilitate analyses of differences between drugs, clinical candidates, and other active compounds. In total, the dataset comprises 614,594 compound-target pairs, 5,109 (3,932) of which are known interactions between drugs (clinical candidates) and targets. The extraction is performed in an automated manner and fully reproducible. We are providing not only the datasets but also the code to rerun the analyses with other ChEMBL releases.
期刊介绍:
Scientific Data is an open-access journal focused on data, publishing descriptions of research datasets and articles on data sharing across natural sciences, medicine, engineering, and social sciences. Its goal is to enhance the sharing and reuse of scientific data, encourage broader data sharing, and acknowledge those who share their data.
The journal primarily publishes Data Descriptors, which offer detailed descriptions of research datasets, including data collection methods and technical analyses validating data quality. These descriptors aim to facilitate data reuse rather than testing hypotheses or presenting new interpretations, methods, or in-depth analyses.