扩大医疗补助计划与良性疾病甲状旁腺切除术的关系:保险状况仍是影响人们前往高流量中心就诊的重要因素。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.072
Marin Kheng, Tomohiro Ko, Alexander Manzella, Joshua C Chao, Amanda M Laird, Toni Beninato
{"title":"扩大医疗补助计划与良性疾病甲状旁腺切除术的关系:保险状况仍是影响人们前往高流量中心就诊的重要因素。","authors":"Marin Kheng, Tomohiro Ko, Alexander Manzella, Joshua C Chao, Amanda M Laird, Toni Beninato","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicaid expansion has been associated with improved access to surgical care at high-volume centers. Its impact on parathyroidectomy, however, is unclear. We evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy at high- and low-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Vizient Clinical Data Base was queried for parathyroidectomies. Patients were grouped by insurance status and pre- and post-Medicaid expansion periods. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles (T1-T3) by operative volume (T1 = highest-volume centers). Odds of parathyroidectomy and a difference-in-differences analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 31,983 patients were identified. Patients were predominantly privately insured (49.9%). Uninsured and Medicaid patients had increasing odds of operation at lower-tertile centers (odds ratio: T1 = ref; uninsured: T2 = 10.0, T3 = 15.8; Medicaid: T2 = 6.2, T3 = 13.5; P < .001). Medicare patients, however, were less likely to undergo operation at lower-volume centers (odds ratio: T2 = 0.89, P < .001; T3 = 0.92, P = .002). Privately insured patients were the least likely to receive care at low-volume centers (odds ratio: T3 = 0.7, P < .001). Medicaid patients in nonexpansion states had 12-16 times higher odds of parathyroidectomy at lower-volume hospitals than their counterparts in expansion states (expansion/nonexpansion states: pre-expansion T3 = 2.3/28.0; postexpansion T3 = 1.3/21.4). Expansion was associated with an increase in the proportion of parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients, with larger gains seen at higher-volume centers (T1 = 5.0%, P = .01; T2 = 3.1%, P = .001; T3 = 2.7%, P = .03). Expansion was not associated with changes in payor distribution for uninsured, Medicare, or privately insured patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients at high-volume centers. However, in nonexpansion states, access to surgical treatment at high-volume centers remains limited for uninsured and underinsured patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy for benign disease: Insurance status remains an important factor in access to high-volume centers.\",\"authors\":\"Marin Kheng, Tomohiro Ko, Alexander Manzella, Joshua C Chao, Amanda M Laird, Toni Beninato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicaid expansion has been associated with improved access to surgical care at high-volume centers. Its impact on parathyroidectomy, however, is unclear. We evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy at high- and low-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Vizient Clinical Data Base was queried for parathyroidectomies. Patients were grouped by insurance status and pre- and post-Medicaid expansion periods. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles (T1-T3) by operative volume (T1 = highest-volume centers). Odds of parathyroidectomy and a difference-in-differences analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 31,983 patients were identified. Patients were predominantly privately insured (49.9%). Uninsured and Medicaid patients had increasing odds of operation at lower-tertile centers (odds ratio: T1 = ref; uninsured: T2 = 10.0, T3 = 15.8; Medicaid: T2 = 6.2, T3 = 13.5; P < .001). Medicare patients, however, were less likely to undergo operation at lower-volume centers (odds ratio: T2 = 0.89, P < .001; T3 = 0.92, P = .002). Privately insured patients were the least likely to receive care at low-volume centers (odds ratio: T3 = 0.7, P < .001). Medicaid patients in nonexpansion states had 12-16 times higher odds of parathyroidectomy at lower-volume hospitals than their counterparts in expansion states (expansion/nonexpansion states: pre-expansion T3 = 2.3/28.0; postexpansion T3 = 1.3/21.4). Expansion was associated with an increase in the proportion of parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients, with larger gains seen at higher-volume centers (T1 = 5.0%, P = .01; T2 = 3.1%, P = .001; T3 = 2.7%, P = .03). Expansion was not associated with changes in payor distribution for uninsured, Medicare, or privately insured patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients at high-volume centers. However, in nonexpansion states, access to surgical treatment at high-volume centers remains limited for uninsured and underinsured patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗补助(Medicaid)的扩大与高流量中心手术护理服务的改善有关。但其对甲状旁腺切除术的影响尚不明确。我们评估了医疗补助计划的扩大与甲状旁腺切除术在高容量和低容量中心的关联:对 Vizient 临床数据库中的甲状旁腺切除术进行了查询。患者按保险状况、医疗补助扩展前后的时期分组。医院按手术量分为三等分(T1-T3)(T1 = 手术量最大的中心)。进行了甲状旁腺切除术的几率分析和差异分析:共确定了 31,983 名患者。患者主要为私人保险患者(49.9%)。未参保和享受医疗补助的患者在低分层中心进行手术的几率增加(几率比:T1 = ref;未参保 = ref;医疗补助 = ref):T1 = ref;未参保:T2=10.0,T3=15.8;医疗补助:T2 = 6.2,T3 = 13.5;P < .001)。然而,医疗保险患者在低流量中心接受手术的可能性较低(几率比:T2 = 0.89,P < .001;T3 = 0.92,P = .002)。私人保险患者最不可能在低流量中心接受治疗(几率比:T3 = 0.7,P < .001)。未扩容州的医疗补助患者在低容量医院接受甲状旁腺切除术的几率是扩容州患者的 12-16 倍(扩容州/未扩容州:扩容前 T3 = 2.3/28.0;扩容后 T3 = 1.3/21.4)。扩建与医疗补助患者接受甲状旁腺切除术的比例增加有关,而在规模较大的中心,增幅更大(T1 = 5.0%,P = .01;T2 = 3.1%,P = .001;T3 = 2.7%,P = .03)。医疗保险的扩大与未参保、医疗保险或私人保险患者的支付方分布变化无关:结论:医疗补助计划的扩大与医疗补助计划患者在高流量中心接受甲状旁腺切除术的增加有关。然而,在未扩大医保范围的州,未参保和参保不足的患者在高流量中心接受手术治疗的机会仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association of Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy for benign disease: Insurance status remains an important factor in access to high-volume centers.

Background: Medicaid expansion has been associated with improved access to surgical care at high-volume centers. Its impact on parathyroidectomy, however, is unclear. We evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy at high- and low-volume centers.

Methods: The Vizient Clinical Data Base was queried for parathyroidectomies. Patients were grouped by insurance status and pre- and post-Medicaid expansion periods. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles (T1-T3) by operative volume (T1 = highest-volume centers). Odds of parathyroidectomy and a difference-in-differences analysis were conducted.

Results: In total, 31,983 patients were identified. Patients were predominantly privately insured (49.9%). Uninsured and Medicaid patients had increasing odds of operation at lower-tertile centers (odds ratio: T1 = ref; uninsured: T2 = 10.0, T3 = 15.8; Medicaid: T2 = 6.2, T3 = 13.5; P < .001). Medicare patients, however, were less likely to undergo operation at lower-volume centers (odds ratio: T2 = 0.89, P < .001; T3 = 0.92, P = .002). Privately insured patients were the least likely to receive care at low-volume centers (odds ratio: T3 = 0.7, P < .001). Medicaid patients in nonexpansion states had 12-16 times higher odds of parathyroidectomy at lower-volume hospitals than their counterparts in expansion states (expansion/nonexpansion states: pre-expansion T3 = 2.3/28.0; postexpansion T3 = 1.3/21.4). Expansion was associated with an increase in the proportion of parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients, with larger gains seen at higher-volume centers (T1 = 5.0%, P = .01; T2 = 3.1%, P = .001; T3 = 2.7%, P = .03). Expansion was not associated with changes in payor distribution for uninsured, Medicare, or privately insured patients.

Conclusions: Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients at high-volume centers. However, in nonexpansion states, access to surgical treatment at high-volume centers remains limited for uninsured and underinsured patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Regarding: "Does using artificial intelligence take the person out of personal statements? We can't tell". Response to letter to the editor on "Long-term lorazepam use may be associated with worse long-term outcomes among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma". Response to letter to the editor: "Team member familiarity and team effectiveness in the operating room: The mediating effect of mutual trust and shared mental models". The importance of a vice chair in a department of surgery: A chair's perspective. Letter to the editor on "Trends and predictors of laparoscopic compared with open emergent inguinal hernia repair".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1