机构措施对静脉注射免疫球蛋白优化使用的影响。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1111/trf.18031
Jean-Nicolas Champagne, Antoine Desilets, Guillaume Roy, Océane Landon-Cardinal, Hugo Chapdelaine, Geneviève Matte, Claudia Bouchard, Benjamin Rioux-Massé, Anne-Sophie Lemay
{"title":"机构措施对静脉注射免疫球蛋白优化使用的影响。","authors":"Jean-Nicolas Champagne, Antoine Desilets, Guillaume Roy, Océane Landon-Cardinal, Hugo Chapdelaine, Geneviève Matte, Claudia Bouchard, Benjamin Rioux-Massé, Anne-Sophie Lemay","doi":"10.1111/trf.18031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) shortage represents an emerging issue in transfusion medicine. Limited data are available to determine effective strategies for optimal use. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to determine the impact of institutional measures on IVIG use at a large academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IVIG infusions from November 26, 2018 to September 25, 2022 were categorized according to their appropriateness (Recommended, Option of treatment, or Unrecommended), based on provincial guidelines, and separated into three phases: Reference, Transition, and Post-Implementation phases, the latter following the adoption of restrictive measures, including mandatory standardized order forms, a blood bank gatekeeping strategy, and the creation of a stewardship committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5431 IVIG infusions were administered to 544 patients, accounting for 295,033 g. The most common indication categories were neurology (30.4%), immunology (29.0%), and hematology (17.4%). From Reference to Post-Implementation phase, IVIG infusions decreased from 2275 to 2000 with unrecommended indications dropping from 9.5% to 7.4% (p = 0.01), and a global reduction of 23.0% (from 131,163 g to 100,936 g of IVIG). Decrease in chronic immunomodulation accounted for 48.3% of total reduction (14,610 g of 30,227 g), whereas single-use immunomodulation, 40.5% (12,237 g of 30,227 g). Moreover, an absolute reduction of 16.9% was observed in orders exceeding the recommended doses (20.8% to 3.9%; p < 0.0001). Together, the unrecommended and excessive IVIG doses decreased from 19,975 g (15.2%) to 6670 g (6.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A global reduction in IVIG use and a preferential decrease in the unrecommended orders were observed, most likely attributable to the bundle of restrictive strategies implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"2286-2295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of institutional measures on optimal use of intravenous immunoglobulin.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Nicolas Champagne, Antoine Desilets, Guillaume Roy, Océane Landon-Cardinal, Hugo Chapdelaine, Geneviève Matte, Claudia Bouchard, Benjamin Rioux-Massé, Anne-Sophie Lemay\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) shortage represents an emerging issue in transfusion medicine. Limited data are available to determine effective strategies for optimal use. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to determine the impact of institutional measures on IVIG use at a large academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IVIG infusions from November 26, 2018 to September 25, 2022 were categorized according to their appropriateness (Recommended, Option of treatment, or Unrecommended), based on provincial guidelines, and separated into three phases: Reference, Transition, and Post-Implementation phases, the latter following the adoption of restrictive measures, including mandatory standardized order forms, a blood bank gatekeeping strategy, and the creation of a stewardship committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5431 IVIG infusions were administered to 544 patients, accounting for 295,033 g. The most common indication categories were neurology (30.4%), immunology (29.0%), and hematology (17.4%). From Reference to Post-Implementation phase, IVIG infusions decreased from 2275 to 2000 with unrecommended indications dropping from 9.5% to 7.4% (p = 0.01), and a global reduction of 23.0% (from 131,163 g to 100,936 g of IVIG). Decrease in chronic immunomodulation accounted for 48.3% of total reduction (14,610 g of 30,227 g), whereas single-use immunomodulation, 40.5% (12,237 g of 30,227 g). Moreover, an absolute reduction of 16.9% was observed in orders exceeding the recommended doses (20.8% to 3.9%; p < 0.0001). Together, the unrecommended and excessive IVIG doses decreased from 19,975 g (15.2%) to 6670 g (6.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A global reduction in IVIG use and a preferential decrease in the unrecommended orders were observed, most likely attributable to the bundle of restrictive strategies implemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2286-2295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)短缺是输血医学中一个新出现的问题。目前可用于确定优化使用的有效策略的数据有限。这项回顾性观察研究旨在确定机构措施对一家大型学术中心 IVIG 使用情况的影响:根据省级指南,将 2018 年 11 月 26 日至 2022 年 9 月 25 日期间的 IVIG 输注按照其适当性(推荐、治疗选择或不推荐)进行分类,并分为三个阶段:参考阶段、过渡阶段和实施后阶段,后者是在采取限制性措施之后,包括强制性标准化订单表格、血库把关策略和建立管理委员会:最常见的适应症类别是神经科(30.4%)、免疫科(29.0%)和血液科(17.4%)。从参考阶段到实施后阶段,IVIG 的输注量从 2275 克减少到 2000 克,未推荐的适应症从 9.5% 减少到 7.4%(p = 0.01),总体减少了 23.0%(IVIG 从 131163 克减少到 100936 克)。慢性免疫调节药物的减少占总减少量的 48.3%(30227 克中的 14610 克),而一次性免疫调节药物的减少占 40.5%(30227 克中的 12237 克)。此外,超过推荐剂量的订单绝对减少了 16.9%(20.8% 降至 3.9%;P 结论:全球减少了 IVIG 的使用和使用量:观察到 IVIG 的使用量全面减少,而未获推荐剂量的订单则优先减少,这很可能是由于实施了捆绑式限制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of institutional measures on optimal use of intravenous immunoglobulin.

Background: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) shortage represents an emerging issue in transfusion medicine. Limited data are available to determine effective strategies for optimal use. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to determine the impact of institutional measures on IVIG use at a large academic center.

Methods: IVIG infusions from November 26, 2018 to September 25, 2022 were categorized according to their appropriateness (Recommended, Option of treatment, or Unrecommended), based on provincial guidelines, and separated into three phases: Reference, Transition, and Post-Implementation phases, the latter following the adoption of restrictive measures, including mandatory standardized order forms, a blood bank gatekeeping strategy, and the creation of a stewardship committee.

Results: A total of 5431 IVIG infusions were administered to 544 patients, accounting for 295,033 g. The most common indication categories were neurology (30.4%), immunology (29.0%), and hematology (17.4%). From Reference to Post-Implementation phase, IVIG infusions decreased from 2275 to 2000 with unrecommended indications dropping from 9.5% to 7.4% (p = 0.01), and a global reduction of 23.0% (from 131,163 g to 100,936 g of IVIG). Decrease in chronic immunomodulation accounted for 48.3% of total reduction (14,610 g of 30,227 g), whereas single-use immunomodulation, 40.5% (12,237 g of 30,227 g). Moreover, an absolute reduction of 16.9% was observed in orders exceeding the recommended doses (20.8% to 3.9%; p < 0.0001). Together, the unrecommended and excessive IVIG doses decreased from 19,975 g (15.2%) to 6670 g (6.6%).

Conclusions: A global reduction in IVIG use and a preferential decrease in the unrecommended orders were observed, most likely attributable to the bundle of restrictive strategies implemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Biotinylation of human platelets is compatible with pathogen inactivation treatment and cold storage for clinical studies. Evolving patterns of first blood product use in trauma in the era of hemorrhage control resuscitation. Effect of concurrent pathogen reduction (amotosalen/UVA) and gamma/x-ray irradiation on biochemical characteristics of apheresis platelets in additive solution. ABO*cisAB allele with unusual phenotype in a Brazilian family. Enhanced oxygen availability and preserved aggregative function in platelet concentrates stored at reduced platelet concentration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1