{"title":"隐性偏见对妇产科住院医生申请过程的影响。","authors":"Thammatat Vorawandthanachai, Calvin Lambert, Nicola Tavella, Cristina M Gonzalez, Francine Hughes","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-23-00601.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Medical students from racially minoritized backgrounds receive negative evaluations more frequently, possibly from implicit bias. <b>Objective</b> To determine if a preference for White applicants over Asian and Black applicants exists among resident and attending reviewers of obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency applications. <b>Methods</b> In 2021, we sampled academic OB/GYN physicians from 6 academic institutions to randomly receive questionnaire form A or B, each containing 4 contrived Electronic Residency Application Service profiles stratified by United States Medical Licensing Examination scores; institutions attended; and strength of recommendation letters into top-, mid-, and low-tiers. Form A applicants were White top-tier, White mid-tier without resilience, Asian mid-tier with resilience, and White low-tier. Form B applicants were Black top-tier, Asian mid-tier without resilience, White mid-tier with resilience, and White low-tier applicants. Both questionnaires' profiles were identical except for applicants' names and races. The primary outcome was participants' rankings of applicants from most to least desirable. Baseline characteristics of participants were compared with chi-square tests. Rankings were compared using generalized estimating equations to calculate the odds ratio (significance <i>P</i><.05). <b>Results</b> One hundred and ninety-one were invited to participate; 109 participants started the questionnaire, and 103 ranked applicants (response rate 54%). Fifty-three participants completed form A, and 56 completed form B. No significant differences were found in participants' demographics. Participants frequently ranked White applicants significantly more highly than Black applicants (-3.3, 95% CI -3.5, -3.1) and Asian applicants (-3.3, 95% CI -3.5, -3.1). <b>Conclusions</b> Despite identical qualifications, a stronger preference for White applicants over Black or Asian applicants was found.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"16 5","pages":"557-563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Implicit Bias on the OB/GYN Residency Application Process.\",\"authors\":\"Thammatat Vorawandthanachai, Calvin Lambert, Nicola Tavella, Cristina M Gonzalez, Francine Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.4300/JGME-D-23-00601.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> Medical students from racially minoritized backgrounds receive negative evaluations more frequently, possibly from implicit bias. <b>Objective</b> To determine if a preference for White applicants over Asian and Black applicants exists among resident and attending reviewers of obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency applications. <b>Methods</b> In 2021, we sampled academic OB/GYN physicians from 6 academic institutions to randomly receive questionnaire form A or B, each containing 4 contrived Electronic Residency Application Service profiles stratified by United States Medical Licensing Examination scores; institutions attended; and strength of recommendation letters into top-, mid-, and low-tiers. Form A applicants were White top-tier, White mid-tier without resilience, Asian mid-tier with resilience, and White low-tier. Form B applicants were Black top-tier, Asian mid-tier without resilience, White mid-tier with resilience, and White low-tier applicants. Both questionnaires' profiles were identical except for applicants' names and races. The primary outcome was participants' rankings of applicants from most to least desirable. Baseline characteristics of participants were compared with chi-square tests. Rankings were compared using generalized estimating equations to calculate the odds ratio (significance <i>P</i><.05). <b>Results</b> One hundred and ninety-one were invited to participate; 109 participants started the questionnaire, and 103 ranked applicants (response rate 54%). Fifty-three participants completed form A, and 56 completed form B. No significant differences were found in participants' demographics. Participants frequently ranked White applicants significantly more highly than Black applicants (-3.3, 95% CI -3.5, -3.1) and Asian applicants (-3.3, 95% CI -3.5, -3.1). <b>Conclusions</b> Despite identical qualifications, a stronger preference for White applicants over Black or Asian applicants was found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"557-563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00601.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00601.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 来自少数种族背景的医学生更常受到负面评价,这可能是由于隐性偏见造成的。目的 确定妇产科住院医师申请的住院医师和主治医师是否存在对白人申请者而非亚裔和黑人申请者的偏好。方法 2021 年,我们从 6 所学术机构的妇产科医师中抽取样本,随机接收问卷 A 或 B,每份问卷包含 4 份虚构的电子住院医师申请服务简介,这些简介按美国医学执照考试分数、就读院校和推荐信强度分为顶级、中级和低级。表格 A 申请人为白人高层、无抗压能力的白人中层、有抗压能力的亚裔中层和白人低层。表格 B 的申请人为黑人高端申请人、无抗逆力的亚裔中端申请人、有抗逆力的白人中端申请人和白人低端申请人。除了申请人的姓名和种族外,两份问卷的内容完全相同。主要结果是参与者对申请人从最理想到最不理想的排序。参与者的基线特征通过卡方检验进行比较。使用广义估计方程对排名进行比较,计算几率比(显著性) 结果 有 191 人受邀参加,109 人开始填写问卷,103 人对申请人进行了排名(回复率为 54%)。53 名参与者填写了表格 A,56 名参与者填写了表格 B。参与者对白人申请者的排名明显高于黑人申请者(-3.3,95% CI -3.5,-3.1)和亚裔申请者(-3.3,95% CI -3.5,-3.1)。结论 尽管资历相同,但白人申请人比黑人或亚裔申请人更受青睐。
The Effect of Implicit Bias on the OB/GYN Residency Application Process.
Background Medical students from racially minoritized backgrounds receive negative evaluations more frequently, possibly from implicit bias. Objective To determine if a preference for White applicants over Asian and Black applicants exists among resident and attending reviewers of obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency applications. Methods In 2021, we sampled academic OB/GYN physicians from 6 academic institutions to randomly receive questionnaire form A or B, each containing 4 contrived Electronic Residency Application Service profiles stratified by United States Medical Licensing Examination scores; institutions attended; and strength of recommendation letters into top-, mid-, and low-tiers. Form A applicants were White top-tier, White mid-tier without resilience, Asian mid-tier with resilience, and White low-tier. Form B applicants were Black top-tier, Asian mid-tier without resilience, White mid-tier with resilience, and White low-tier applicants. Both questionnaires' profiles were identical except for applicants' names and races. The primary outcome was participants' rankings of applicants from most to least desirable. Baseline characteristics of participants were compared with chi-square tests. Rankings were compared using generalized estimating equations to calculate the odds ratio (significance P<.05). Results One hundred and ninety-one were invited to participate; 109 participants started the questionnaire, and 103 ranked applicants (response rate 54%). Fifty-three participants completed form A, and 56 completed form B. No significant differences were found in participants' demographics. Participants frequently ranked White applicants significantly more highly than Black applicants (-3.3, 95% CI -3.5, -3.1) and Asian applicants (-3.3, 95% CI -3.5, -3.1). Conclusions Despite identical qualifications, a stronger preference for White applicants over Black or Asian applicants was found.
期刊介绍:
- Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.