使用手术自主权计划的手术自主权性别差异:一项多中心研究。

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-23-00682.1
Elayna P Kirsch, Vishal Venkatraman, Di Deng, Katherine E McDaniel, Alexander D Suarez, Sean M Lew, Josiah Orina, Howard Silberstein, Ira Goldstein, Grahame Gould, Chirag D Gandhi, Chirag Patil, Bradley A Dengler, Rajeev Dharmapurikar, Shivanand P Lad, Michael M Haglund
{"title":"使用手术自主权计划的手术自主权性别差异:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Elayna P Kirsch, Vishal Venkatraman, Di Deng, Katherine E McDaniel, Alexander D Suarez, Sean M Lew, Josiah Orina, Howard Silberstein, Ira Goldstein, Grahame Gould, Chirag D Gandhi, Chirag Patil, Bradley A Dengler, Rajeev Dharmapurikar, Shivanand P Lad, Michael M Haglund","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-23-00682.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> The proportion of women surgeons is increasing, but studies show that women in surgical residency are granted less autonomy than men. <b>Objective</b> We utilized the Surgical Autonomy Program (SAP), an educational framework, to evaluate gender differences in self-reported autonomy, attending-reported autonomy, and operative feedback among US neurosurgical residents. <b>Methods</b> The SAP tracks resident progression and guides teaching in neurosurgery. Surgeries are divided into zones of proximal development (opening, exposure, critical portion, and closure). Postoperatively, resident autonomy is rated on a 4-point scale by the resident and the attending for each part of the case, or zone. We utilized data from July 2017 to February 2024 from 8 institutions. Ordinal regression was used to evaluate the odds of self- and attending-evaluated autonomy, accounting for gender, training year, case difficulty, and institution. Differences between attending assessment and self-assessment were calculated across time. Chi-square analyses were used to measure any differences in feedback given to men and women. <b>Results</b> From 128 residents (32 women, 25%), 11894 cases were included. Women were granted less autonomy (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.89; <i>P</i><.001) and self-evaluated as having less autonomy (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.67-0.80; <i>P</i><.001). The odds of women operating at higher autonomy were similar to the odds of operating on a hard case compared to average difficulty (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71-0.84; <i>P</i><.001). Men's and women's self-assessment became closer to attending assessment over time, with women improving more quickly for the critical portions of surgeries. Women residents received meaningful postoperative feedback on fewer cases (women: 74.2%, men: 80.5%; X<sup>2</sup>=31.929; <i>P</i><.001). <b>Conclusions</b> Women operated with lower autonomy by both attending and self-assessment, but the assessment gap between genders decreased over time. Women also received less feedback from their attendings.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"16 5","pages":"517-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Operative Autonomy Using the Surgical Autonomy Program: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elayna P Kirsch, Vishal Venkatraman, Di Deng, Katherine E McDaniel, Alexander D Suarez, Sean M Lew, Josiah Orina, Howard Silberstein, Ira Goldstein, Grahame Gould, Chirag D Gandhi, Chirag Patil, Bradley A Dengler, Rajeev Dharmapurikar, Shivanand P Lad, Michael M Haglund\",\"doi\":\"10.4300/JGME-D-23-00682.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> The proportion of women surgeons is increasing, but studies show that women in surgical residency are granted less autonomy than men. <b>Objective</b> We utilized the Surgical Autonomy Program (SAP), an educational framework, to evaluate gender differences in self-reported autonomy, attending-reported autonomy, and operative feedback among US neurosurgical residents. <b>Methods</b> The SAP tracks resident progression and guides teaching in neurosurgery. Surgeries are divided into zones of proximal development (opening, exposure, critical portion, and closure). Postoperatively, resident autonomy is rated on a 4-point scale by the resident and the attending for each part of the case, or zone. We utilized data from July 2017 to February 2024 from 8 institutions. Ordinal regression was used to evaluate the odds of self- and attending-evaluated autonomy, accounting for gender, training year, case difficulty, and institution. Differences between attending assessment and self-assessment were calculated across time. Chi-square analyses were used to measure any differences in feedback given to men and women. <b>Results</b> From 128 residents (32 women, 25%), 11894 cases were included. Women were granted less autonomy (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.89; <i>P</i><.001) and self-evaluated as having less autonomy (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.67-0.80; <i>P</i><.001). The odds of women operating at higher autonomy were similar to the odds of operating on a hard case compared to average difficulty (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71-0.84; <i>P</i><.001). Men's and women's self-assessment became closer to attending assessment over time, with women improving more quickly for the critical portions of surgeries. Women residents received meaningful postoperative feedback on fewer cases (women: 74.2%, men: 80.5%; X<sup>2</sup>=31.929; <i>P</i><.001). <b>Conclusions</b> Women operated with lower autonomy by both attending and self-assessment, but the assessment gap between genders decreased over time. Women also received less feedback from their attendings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"517-524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475442/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00682.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00682.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 女外科医生的比例正在增加,但研究表明,在外科住院医师培训中,女性获得的自主权少于男性。目的 我们利用手术自主权计划(SAP)这一教育框架来评估美国神经外科住院医生在自我报告自主权、主治医生报告自主权和手术反馈方面的性别差异。方法 SAP 跟踪住院医师的进展并指导神经外科教学。手术分为近端发展区(开刀、暴露、关键部分和闭合)。术后,住院医师和主治医师根据病例的每个部分或区域,以 4 分制对住院医师的自主性进行评分。我们利用了 8 家机构 2017 年 7 月至 2024 年 2 月的数据。在考虑性别、培训年限、病例难度和机构的情况下,我们采用了正回归法来评估自我评价和主治评价自主性的几率。计算了不同时间段主治评估和自我评估之间的差异。采用卡方分析来衡量男女反馈意见的差异。结果 128 名住院医师(32 名女性,占 25%)共纳入了 11894 个病例。女性获得的自主权较少(OR 0.81;95% CI 0.74-0.89;PPP2=31.929;PConclusions 通过主治医生和自我评估,女性的手术自主权较低,但随着时间的推移,两性之间的评估差距有所缩小。女性从主治医生那里获得的反馈也较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Differences in Operative Autonomy Using the Surgical Autonomy Program: A Multicenter Study.

Background The proportion of women surgeons is increasing, but studies show that women in surgical residency are granted less autonomy than men. Objective We utilized the Surgical Autonomy Program (SAP), an educational framework, to evaluate gender differences in self-reported autonomy, attending-reported autonomy, and operative feedback among US neurosurgical residents. Methods The SAP tracks resident progression and guides teaching in neurosurgery. Surgeries are divided into zones of proximal development (opening, exposure, critical portion, and closure). Postoperatively, resident autonomy is rated on a 4-point scale by the resident and the attending for each part of the case, or zone. We utilized data from July 2017 to February 2024 from 8 institutions. Ordinal regression was used to evaluate the odds of self- and attending-evaluated autonomy, accounting for gender, training year, case difficulty, and institution. Differences between attending assessment and self-assessment were calculated across time. Chi-square analyses were used to measure any differences in feedback given to men and women. Results From 128 residents (32 women, 25%), 11894 cases were included. Women were granted less autonomy (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.89; P<.001) and self-evaluated as having less autonomy (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.67-0.80; P<.001). The odds of women operating at higher autonomy were similar to the odds of operating on a hard case compared to average difficulty (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71-0.84; P<.001). Men's and women's self-assessment became closer to attending assessment over time, with women improving more quickly for the critical portions of surgeries. Women residents received meaningful postoperative feedback on fewer cases (women: 74.2%, men: 80.5%; X2=31.929; P<.001). Conclusions Women operated with lower autonomy by both attending and self-assessment, but the assessment gap between genders decreased over time. Women also received less feedback from their attendings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
期刊最新文献
A Residency Elective in Sustainable Health Care. Adapting the Planetary Health Report Card for Graduate Medical Training Programs. An Interprofessional Approach to Prepare Medical Residents and Fellows to Address Climate- and Environment-Related Health Risks. Assessing Physician Climate Change Competency via Medical Licensing and Board Examinations: Lessons From Integrating Ultrasound Topics in Emergency Medicine. Climate Change Curriculum in a Network of US Family Medicine Residency Programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1