在 COVID-19 大流行期间支持住院医师和研究员福祉的干预措施:范围审查。

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00016.1
Halah Ibrahim, Sawsan Abdel-Razig, Lyuba Konopasek, Jillian Silverberg, Ingrid Philibert
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间支持住院医师和研究员福祉的干预措施:范围审查。","authors":"Halah Ibrahim, Sawsan Abdel-Razig, Lyuba Konopasek, Jillian Silverberg, Ingrid Philibert","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00016.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> The COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid and wide-scale changes in graduate medical education and impacted the well-being of frontline physicians, including residents and fellows. While institutions and programs implemented initiatives to support the unique needs of trainees during the pandemic, there remains a gap in the literature in examining the approaches used, the domains of well-being addressed, and the effectiveness of these efforts. <b>Objective</b> To review the literature on interventions designed to promote resident and fellow well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods</b> The authors conducted a scoping review of the literature published between January 1, 2020, and November 30, 2023, in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and ERIC to identify interventions to promote the well-being of trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Results</b> Eighteen articles met inclusion criteria, mainly studies conducted in the United States (14 of 18, 77.8%). Most interventions targeted psychological well-being (16 of 18, 88.9%), with only a few studies that included interventions in the physical or social domains. Interventions entailed redeployment, schedule modifications, communication strategies, and expanded mental health support. Most interventions were limited to a few weeks' duration in the first surge phase of the pandemic. Only 11 studies (61%) reported outcome measures, and only 2 (11%) used instruments with validity evidence. Most studies did not report sufficient data to evaluate study quality. <b>Conclusions</b> While longer-term outcome data were often lacking, studies described a range of interventions to support resident well-being. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of well-being interventions and include cohorts from more diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"16 5","pages":"545-556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to Support Resident and Fellow Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Halah Ibrahim, Sawsan Abdel-Razig, Lyuba Konopasek, Jillian Silverberg, Ingrid Philibert\",\"doi\":\"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00016.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> The COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid and wide-scale changes in graduate medical education and impacted the well-being of frontline physicians, including residents and fellows. While institutions and programs implemented initiatives to support the unique needs of trainees during the pandemic, there remains a gap in the literature in examining the approaches used, the domains of well-being addressed, and the effectiveness of these efforts. <b>Objective</b> To review the literature on interventions designed to promote resident and fellow well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods</b> The authors conducted a scoping review of the literature published between January 1, 2020, and November 30, 2023, in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and ERIC to identify interventions to promote the well-being of trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Results</b> Eighteen articles met inclusion criteria, mainly studies conducted in the United States (14 of 18, 77.8%). Most interventions targeted psychological well-being (16 of 18, 88.9%), with only a few studies that included interventions in the physical or social domains. Interventions entailed redeployment, schedule modifications, communication strategies, and expanded mental health support. Most interventions were limited to a few weeks' duration in the first surge phase of the pandemic. Only 11 studies (61%) reported outcome measures, and only 2 (11%) used instruments with validity evidence. Most studies did not report sufficient data to evaluate study quality. <b>Conclusions</b> While longer-term outcome data were often lacking, studies described a range of interventions to support resident well-being. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of well-being interventions and include cohorts from more diverse clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"545-556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475423/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00016.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00016.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 COVID-19 大流行导致医学研究生教育发生了迅速而广泛的变化,并影响了一线医生(包括住院医师和研究员)的福利。虽然各机构和项目在大流行期间实施了各种措施来支持受训者的独特需求,但在研究这些措施所采用的方法、所涉及的福利领域以及这些努力的有效性方面,文献仍存在空白。目的 回顾有关在 COVID-19 大流行期间旨在促进住院医师和研究员福利的干预措施的文献。方法 作者对 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 30 日期间在 PubMed、Scopus、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 ERIC 上发表的文献进行了范围界定,以确定在 COVID-19 大流行期间促进学员福利的干预措施。结果 有 18 篇文章符合纳入标准,主要是在美国进行的研究(18 篇中有 14 篇,占 77.8%)。大多数干预措施以心理健康为目标(18 项中的 16 项,88.9%),只有少数研究包括了身体或社会领域的干预措施。干预措施包括重新部署、修改日程安排、沟通策略和扩大心理健康支持。大多数干预措施仅限于在大流行的第一个激增阶段采取为期几周的措施。只有 11 项研究(61%)报告了结果测量,其中只有 2 项研究(11%)使用了具有有效性证据的工具。大多数研究没有报告足够的数据来评估研究质量。结论 虽然往往缺乏长期结果数据,但研究描述了一系列支持居民福祉的干预措施。未来的研究应重点关注幸福感干预措施的有效性,并纳入来自更多样化临床环境的队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interventions to Support Resident and Fellow Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid and wide-scale changes in graduate medical education and impacted the well-being of frontline physicians, including residents and fellows. While institutions and programs implemented initiatives to support the unique needs of trainees during the pandemic, there remains a gap in the literature in examining the approaches used, the domains of well-being addressed, and the effectiveness of these efforts. Objective To review the literature on interventions designed to promote resident and fellow well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The authors conducted a scoping review of the literature published between January 1, 2020, and November 30, 2023, in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and ERIC to identify interventions to promote the well-being of trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Eighteen articles met inclusion criteria, mainly studies conducted in the United States (14 of 18, 77.8%). Most interventions targeted psychological well-being (16 of 18, 88.9%), with only a few studies that included interventions in the physical or social domains. Interventions entailed redeployment, schedule modifications, communication strategies, and expanded mental health support. Most interventions were limited to a few weeks' duration in the first surge phase of the pandemic. Only 11 studies (61%) reported outcome measures, and only 2 (11%) used instruments with validity evidence. Most studies did not report sufficient data to evaluate study quality. Conclusions While longer-term outcome data were often lacking, studies described a range of interventions to support resident well-being. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of well-being interventions and include cohorts from more diverse clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
期刊最新文献
A Residency Elective in Sustainable Health Care. Adapting the Planetary Health Report Card for Graduate Medical Training Programs. An Interprofessional Approach to Prepare Medical Residents and Fellows to Address Climate- and Environment-Related Health Risks. Assessing Physician Climate Change Competency via Medical Licensing and Board Examinations: Lessons From Integrating Ultrasound Topics in Emergency Medicine. Climate Change Curriculum in a Network of US Family Medicine Residency Programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1