新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的成人决策能力与健康研究。

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.26635/6965.6684
Ben Gray, Angela Ballantyne
{"title":"新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的成人决策能力与健康研究。","authors":"Ben Gray, Angela Ballantyne","doi":"10.26635/6965.6684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (the Code)1 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act (the Act)2 are up for review. The Code currently applies to clinical care, teaching and research. When it was introduced, there were no national mechanisms to govern research, but since then the National Ethics Advisory Committee (NEAC) has developed detailed guidelines and established a network of ethics committees at various institutional levels. As currently written, the Code prohibits research on a patient who lacks capacity unless it is in their \"best interests.\" This precludes some important research. The NEAC guidelines are more nuanced and measured, designed to balance the risks to the patient with the benefits to the community. We argue that the Code and the Act should be amended to allow decisions about research proposals on people who lack capacity to be made by an ethics committee set up by NEAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1604","pages":"87-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult decision-making capacity and health research in Aotearoa New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Ben Gray, Angela Ballantyne\",\"doi\":\"10.26635/6965.6684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (the Code)1 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act (the Act)2 are up for review. The Code currently applies to clinical care, teaching and research. When it was introduced, there were no national mechanisms to govern research, but since then the National Ethics Advisory Committee (NEAC) has developed detailed guidelines and established a network of ethics committees at various institutional levels. As currently written, the Code prohibits research on a patient who lacks capacity unless it is in their \\\"best interests.\\\" This precludes some important research. The NEAC guidelines are more nuanced and measured, designed to balance the risks to the patient with the benefits to the community. We argue that the Code and the Act should be amended to allow decisions about research proposals on people who lack capacity to be made by an ethics committee set up by NEAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"137 1604\",\"pages\":\"87-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康与残疾服务消费者权利守则》(《守则》)1 和《健康与残疾专员法》(《专员法》)2 正在接受审查。该守则目前适用于临床护理、教学和研究。守则》出台时,还没有管理研究工作的国家机制,但自那时起,国家伦理咨询委员会(NEAC)制定了详细的指导方针,并在各级机构建立了伦理委员会网络。按照目前的规定,该准则禁止对缺乏行为能力的病人进行研究,除非研究符合他们的 "最佳利益"。这就排除了一些重要的研究。东北亚伦理委员会的指导方针则更加细致入微,旨在平衡病人所面临的风险与社会所获得的利益。我们认为,应当对《准则》和《法案》进行修订,允许由 NEAC 成立的伦理委员会就针对无行为能力者的研究提案作出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adult decision-making capacity and health research in Aotearoa New Zealand.

The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (the Code)1 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act (the Act)2 are up for review. The Code currently applies to clinical care, teaching and research. When it was introduced, there were no national mechanisms to govern research, but since then the National Ethics Advisory Committee (NEAC) has developed detailed guidelines and established a network of ethics committees at various institutional levels. As currently written, the Code prohibits research on a patient who lacks capacity unless it is in their "best interests." This precludes some important research. The NEAC guidelines are more nuanced and measured, designed to balance the risks to the patient with the benefits to the community. We argue that the Code and the Act should be amended to allow decisions about research proposals on people who lack capacity to be made by an ethics committee set up by NEAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
A laboratory-developed extraction free real-time PCR for Group A Streptococcus in throat swabs: greater detection and faster results. Assessing the impact of physical, mental and cognitive impairments on health-related quality of life in sepsis survivors following intensive care admission in New Zealand. Case study of a potential West Polynesian variant of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Cultural safety and the medical profession in Aotearoa New Zealand: a training framework and the pursuit of Māori health equity. Ethnic variations in traumatic injury hospitalisations in a health region of Aotearoa New Zealand-10-year review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1