Ben C. Winestone, Glenn A. Melvin, Ruth Tatnell, David J. Hallford
{"title":"对成年人进行简短的在线自杀风险评估,即使在自杀自我污名、自杀意念和心理困扰升高的情况下,也不会影响其状态情绪。","authors":"Ben C. Winestone, Glenn A. Melvin, Ruth Tatnell, David J. Hallford","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study aimed to assess whether online suicide risk assessment affects state mood and is the first to examine if suicide-related self-stigma or coping related to suicidal ideation are predictors of mood change. The Australian participants (<i>N</i> = 661, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34.9, <i>SD</i> = 12.3, 57.1% female), recruited through a crowd-sourcing platform, completed a visual analogue mood measure before and after the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), an assessment tool. Followed by a modified version of the Internalised Stigma Scale, the Brief COPE and DASS-21. State mood did not change from pre- to post-suicide risk assessment in the overall sample, <i>t</i>(662) = −.16, <i>p</i> = .868, <i>d</i> = −.01. Contrary to hypotheses, neither self-stigma nor coping were related to mood change following exposure to the SIDAS. The multiple regression model was not significant, <i>F</i>(9,643) = 1.16, <i>p</i> = .31., nor was any single predictor including gender, current Suicide risk β = −.04, <i>t</i> = −.80 or psychological distress β = −.09, <i>t</i> = −1.76, <i>p</i> = .08. These findings suggest that online exposure to a suicide risk tool is unlikely to be iatrogenic in relation to state mood, even in the context of elevated self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1347-1352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.13256","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief online suicide risk assessment of adults does not affect state mood, even in the context of elevated suicidality self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress\",\"authors\":\"Ben C. Winestone, Glenn A. Melvin, Ruth Tatnell, David J. Hallford\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijop.13256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The current study aimed to assess whether online suicide risk assessment affects state mood and is the first to examine if suicide-related self-stigma or coping related to suicidal ideation are predictors of mood change. The Australian participants (<i>N</i> = 661, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34.9, <i>SD</i> = 12.3, 57.1% female), recruited through a crowd-sourcing platform, completed a visual analogue mood measure before and after the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), an assessment tool. Followed by a modified version of the Internalised Stigma Scale, the Brief COPE and DASS-21. State mood did not change from pre- to post-suicide risk assessment in the overall sample, <i>t</i>(662) = −.16, <i>p</i> = .868, <i>d</i> = −.01. Contrary to hypotheses, neither self-stigma nor coping were related to mood change following exposure to the SIDAS. The multiple regression model was not significant, <i>F</i>(9,643) = 1.16, <i>p</i> = .31., nor was any single predictor including gender, current Suicide risk β = −.04, <i>t</i> = −.80 or psychological distress β = −.09, <i>t</i> = −1.76, <i>p</i> = .08. These findings suggest that online exposure to a suicide risk tool is unlikely to be iatrogenic in relation to state mood, even in the context of elevated self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"1347-1352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.13256\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.13256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.13256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估在线自杀风险评估是否会影响状态情绪,并首次研究与自杀相关的自我污名或与自杀意念相关的应对措施是否是情绪变化的预测因素。通过众包平台招募的澳大利亚参与者(N = 661,Mage = 34.9,SD = 12.3,57.1%为女性)在使用评估工具自杀意念属性量表(SIDAS)前后完成了视觉模拟情绪测量。之后还完成了修改版内化耻辱感量表、简短 COPE 和 DASS-21。在总体样本中,自杀风险评估前后的状态情绪没有变化,t(662)= -.16,p = .868,d = -.01。与假设相反,在接触 SIDAS 后,自我耻辱感和应对方式都与情绪变化无关。多元回归模型不显著(F(9,643) = 1.16, p = .31.),包括性别、当前自杀风险 β = -.04, t = -.80 或心理困扰 β = -.09, t = -1.76, p = .08在内的任何单一预测因子也不显著。这些研究结果表明,即使在自我污名、自杀意念和心理困扰升高的情况下,在线接触自杀风险工具也不太可能对状态情绪产生先天性影响。
Brief online suicide risk assessment of adults does not affect state mood, even in the context of elevated suicidality self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress
The current study aimed to assess whether online suicide risk assessment affects state mood and is the first to examine if suicide-related self-stigma or coping related to suicidal ideation are predictors of mood change. The Australian participants (N = 661, Mage = 34.9, SD = 12.3, 57.1% female), recruited through a crowd-sourcing platform, completed a visual analogue mood measure before and after the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), an assessment tool. Followed by a modified version of the Internalised Stigma Scale, the Brief COPE and DASS-21. State mood did not change from pre- to post-suicide risk assessment in the overall sample, t(662) = −.16, p = .868, d = −.01. Contrary to hypotheses, neither self-stigma nor coping were related to mood change following exposure to the SIDAS. The multiple regression model was not significant, F(9,643) = 1.16, p = .31., nor was any single predictor including gender, current Suicide risk β = −.04, t = −.80 or psychological distress β = −.09, t = −1.76, p = .08. These findings suggest that online exposure to a suicide risk tool is unlikely to be iatrogenic in relation to state mood, even in the context of elevated self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.