处方管制药物的获取是阿片类药物过量的潜在诱因:病例交叉研究。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104620
Allen M. Smith , Cheng Peng , Austin Porter , Bradley C. Martin
{"title":"处方管制药物的获取是阿片类药物过量的潜在诱因:病例交叉研究。","authors":"Allen M. Smith ,&nbsp;Cheng Peng ,&nbsp;Austin Porter ,&nbsp;Bradley C. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Background:</em> The role of prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines as risk factors for opioid overdose are well established, however, their role as potential ‘triggers’ of opioid overdose has not been formally investigated. O<em>bjective:</em> The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between controlled substance acquisition and opioid overdose utilizing a case-crossover design. <em>Methods:</em> This study utilized Arkansas statewide data between 2014 and 2020. Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data were used to assess controlled substance acquisition and fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose were assessed using linked death certificate, inpatient discharge, and emergency department (ED) data. All persons residing in Arkansas who experienced an opioid overdose or had ≥ 1 Arkansas PDMP prescription fill(s) were included. Controlled substance characteristics were described in the 7 days prior to overdose and compared to the controlled substance characteristics in 11 weekly (7-day) control windows prior to overdose. Binary controlled substance variables indicating presence or absence of: any controlled substance, opioid, benzodiazepine, stimulant, sedative, carisoprodol, opioid and benzodiazepine, and opioid and benzodiazepine and carisoprodol were created. Additionally, total morphine milliequivalents were calculated for each time window. Conditional logistic regression models were estimated and adjusted odds ratios for each controlled substance characteristic after accounting for other controlled substance, and prior overdose, and clinical characteristics derived from ED and inpatient data are reported. <em>Results:</em> A total of 2,818,135 individuals with ≥1 Arkansas PDMP record(s) (45.10 % male; 39.94 mean age) were included, of which 28,670 (1.02 %) experienced ≥1 opioid overdose. There was a significant association between opioid overdose and the acquisition of a controlled substance (OR=1.785; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), opioid (OR=1.992; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), benzodiazepine (OR=1.379; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), carisoprodol (OR=1.744; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), opioid and benzodiazepine (OR=2.203; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and opioid and benzodiazepine and carisoprodol (OR=2.503; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), in the 7 days prior to an opioid overdose event. <em>Conclusion:</em> Controlled substance prescription acquisition, particularly opioids in combination with carisoprodol and/or benzodiazepines, are potential triggers of opioid overdose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 104620"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of prescribed controlled substance acquisition as potential triggers of opioid overdose: A case-crossover study\",\"authors\":\"Allen M. Smith ,&nbsp;Cheng Peng ,&nbsp;Austin Porter ,&nbsp;Bradley C. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Background:</em> The role of prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines as risk factors for opioid overdose are well established, however, their role as potential ‘triggers’ of opioid overdose has not been formally investigated. O<em>bjective:</em> The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between controlled substance acquisition and opioid overdose utilizing a case-crossover design. <em>Methods:</em> This study utilized Arkansas statewide data between 2014 and 2020. Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data were used to assess controlled substance acquisition and fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose were assessed using linked death certificate, inpatient discharge, and emergency department (ED) data. All persons residing in Arkansas who experienced an opioid overdose or had ≥ 1 Arkansas PDMP prescription fill(s) were included. Controlled substance characteristics were described in the 7 days prior to overdose and compared to the controlled substance characteristics in 11 weekly (7-day) control windows prior to overdose. Binary controlled substance variables indicating presence or absence of: any controlled substance, opioid, benzodiazepine, stimulant, sedative, carisoprodol, opioid and benzodiazepine, and opioid and benzodiazepine and carisoprodol were created. Additionally, total morphine milliequivalents were calculated for each time window. Conditional logistic regression models were estimated and adjusted odds ratios for each controlled substance characteristic after accounting for other controlled substance, and prior overdose, and clinical characteristics derived from ED and inpatient data are reported. <em>Results:</em> A total of 2,818,135 individuals with ≥1 Arkansas PDMP record(s) (45.10 % male; 39.94 mean age) were included, of which 28,670 (1.02 %) experienced ≥1 opioid overdose. There was a significant association between opioid overdose and the acquisition of a controlled substance (OR=1.785; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), opioid (OR=1.992; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), benzodiazepine (OR=1.379; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), carisoprodol (OR=1.744; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), opioid and benzodiazepine (OR=2.203; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and opioid and benzodiazepine and carisoprodol (OR=2.503; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), in the 7 days prior to an opioid overdose event. <em>Conclusion:</em> Controlled substance prescription acquisition, particularly opioids in combination with carisoprodol and/or benzodiazepines, are potential triggers of opioid overdose.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924003049\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924003049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:处方阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物作为阿片类药物过量风险因素的作用已得到公认,但它们作为阿片类药物过量潜在 "诱因 "的作用尚未得到正式调查:本研究的目的是利用病例交叉设计评估受管制物质的获取与阿片类药物过量之间的时间关系:本研究利用了阿肯色州 2014 年至 2020 年的全州数据。处方药监控计划(PDMP)数据用于评估受管制药物的获取情况,而致命和非致命阿片类药物过量则通过关联的死亡证明、住院病人出院和急诊科(ED)数据进行评估。所有居住在阿肯色州、经历过阿片类药物过量或阿肯色州 PDMP 处方≥1 次的人都包括在内。描述了用药过量前 7 天的受控物质特征,并与用药过量前 11 个每周(7 天)对照窗口的受控物质特征进行了比较。创建了二元受控物质变量,表明是否存在以下受控物质:任何受控物质、阿片类药物、苯二氮卓类药物、兴奋剂、镇静剂、卡异丙醇、阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物、阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物以及卡异丙醇。此外,还计算了每个时间窗的吗啡毫当量总量。对条件逻辑回归模型进行了估计,并报告了在考虑了其他受控物质、先前用药过量以及从急诊室和住院病人数据中得出的临床特征后,每种受控物质特征的调整几率比:共纳入了 2,818,135 名有≥1 条阿肯色州 PDMP 记录的人(45.10% 为男性;平均年龄为 39.94 岁),其中 28,670 人(1.02%)经历了≥1 次阿片类药物过量。阿片类药物过量与获得受管制物质(OR=1.785;p < 0.001)、阿片类药物(OR=1.992;p < 0.001)、苯二氮卓(OR=1.379;p < 0.001)、卡西普多(OR=1.744;p<0.001)、阿片类药物和苯二氮卓(OR=2.203;p<0.001)、阿片类药物和苯二氮卓以及卡异丙醇(OR=2.503;p<0.001):结论:获取受控物质处方,尤其是阿片类药物与卡异丙醇和/或苯二氮卓类药物的组合,是阿片类药物过量的潜在诱因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of prescribed controlled substance acquisition as potential triggers of opioid overdose: A case-crossover study
Background: The role of prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines as risk factors for opioid overdose are well established, however, their role as potential ‘triggers’ of opioid overdose has not been formally investigated. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between controlled substance acquisition and opioid overdose utilizing a case-crossover design. Methods: This study utilized Arkansas statewide data between 2014 and 2020. Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data were used to assess controlled substance acquisition and fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose were assessed using linked death certificate, inpatient discharge, and emergency department (ED) data. All persons residing in Arkansas who experienced an opioid overdose or had ≥ 1 Arkansas PDMP prescription fill(s) were included. Controlled substance characteristics were described in the 7 days prior to overdose and compared to the controlled substance characteristics in 11 weekly (7-day) control windows prior to overdose. Binary controlled substance variables indicating presence or absence of: any controlled substance, opioid, benzodiazepine, stimulant, sedative, carisoprodol, opioid and benzodiazepine, and opioid and benzodiazepine and carisoprodol were created. Additionally, total morphine milliequivalents were calculated for each time window. Conditional logistic regression models were estimated and adjusted odds ratios for each controlled substance characteristic after accounting for other controlled substance, and prior overdose, and clinical characteristics derived from ED and inpatient data are reported. Results: A total of 2,818,135 individuals with ≥1 Arkansas PDMP record(s) (45.10 % male; 39.94 mean age) were included, of which 28,670 (1.02 %) experienced ≥1 opioid overdose. There was a significant association between opioid overdose and the acquisition of a controlled substance (OR=1.785; p < 0.001), opioid (OR=1.992; p < 0.001), benzodiazepine (OR=1.379; p < 0.001), carisoprodol (OR=1.744; p < 0.001), opioid and benzodiazepine (OR=2.203; p < 0.001), and opioid and benzodiazepine and carisoprodol (OR=2.503; p < 0.001), in the 7 days prior to an opioid overdose event. Conclusion: Controlled substance prescription acquisition, particularly opioids in combination with carisoprodol and/or benzodiazepines, are potential triggers of opioid overdose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022 Suboptimal uptake and placement of a mandatory alcohol pregnancy warning label in Australia Increases in employment over six months following Khanya: A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered behavioral intervention for substance use and HIV medication adherence in Cape Town, South Africa The criminal careers of Australian drug traffickers Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis cultivation and use in 18 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1