左心室高帧率回波粒子图像测速仪与患者四维血流磁共振成像的验证。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.012
Yichuang Han , Daniel J. Bowen , Bernardo Loff Barreto , Robert. R. Zwaan , Mihai Strachinaru , Rob J. van der Geest , Alexander Hirsch , Annemien E. van den Bosch , Johan G. Bosch , Jason Voorneveld
{"title":"左心室高帧率回波粒子图像测速仪与患者四维血流磁共振成像的验证。","authors":"Yichuang Han ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Bowen ,&nbsp;Bernardo Loff Barreto ,&nbsp;Robert. R. Zwaan ,&nbsp;Mihai Strachinaru ,&nbsp;Rob J. van der Geest ,&nbsp;Alexander Hirsch ,&nbsp;Annemien E. van den Bosch ,&nbsp;Johan G. Bosch ,&nbsp;Jason Voorneveld","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for <em>in vivo</em> left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy (<span><math><mtext>KE</mtext></math></span>) and viscous energy loss (<span><math><mover><mtext>EL</mtext><mi>˙</mi></mover></math></span>) were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), cosine similarity and Bland–Altman analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and NMAE of (14 ± 5)%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by (3 ± 6) cm/s in systole and (6 ± 10) cm/s in diastole. The <span><math><mtext>KE</mtext></math></span> and rate of <span><math><mover><mtext>EL</mtext><mi>˙</mi></mover></math></span> also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with NMAE of (23 ± 7)% and (52 ± 16)%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Left Ventricular High Frame Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry against 4D Flow MRI in Patients\",\"authors\":\"Yichuang Han ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Bowen ,&nbsp;Bernardo Loff Barreto ,&nbsp;Robert. R. Zwaan ,&nbsp;Mihai Strachinaru ,&nbsp;Rob J. van der Geest ,&nbsp;Alexander Hirsch ,&nbsp;Annemien E. van den Bosch ,&nbsp;Johan G. Bosch ,&nbsp;Jason Voorneveld\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for <em>in vivo</em> left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy (<span><math><mtext>KE</mtext></math></span>) and viscous energy loss (<span><math><mover><mtext>EL</mtext><mi>˙</mi></mover></math></span>) were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), cosine similarity and Bland–Altman analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and NMAE of (14 ± 5)%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by (3 ± 6) cm/s in systole and (6 ± 10) cm/s in diastole. The <span><math><mtext>KE</mtext></math></span> and rate of <span><math><mover><mtext>EL</mtext><mi>˙</mi></mover></math></span> also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with NMAE of (23 ± 7)% and (52 ± 16)%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003594\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:精确测量心内血流模式有助于深入了解心脏疾病的病理生理学,从而提高诊断和预后能力。本研究旨在验证回波粒子图像测速仪(echoPIV)与四维血流磁共振成像在体内左心室心内血流成像中的效果:我们从 26 名需要进行心脏磁共振成像的患者的三个标准心尖切面获取了高帧率对比增强超声图像。每个患者都获得了四维血流 MRI。只有质量足够高且与核磁共振成像对齐的回波图像平面才会被纳入验证范围。使用归一化平均绝对误差(NMAE)、余弦相似度和布兰-阿尔特曼分析比较了不同模式的区域速度、动能(KE)和粘性能量损失(EL˙):在 24 次心尖视图采集中,我们观察到 echoPIV 和 MRI 在空间流动模式和涡流轨迹方面具有良好的对应性。基底(二尖瓣)横截面的速度曲线余弦相似度为 0.92 ± 0.06,NMAE 为 (14 ± 5)%。收缩期的峰值空间平均速度相差(3±6)厘米/秒,舒张期相差(6±10)厘米/秒。EL˙的KE和速率也显示出高度的余弦相似性(0.89 ± 0.09和0.91 ± 0.06),NMAE分别为(23 ± 7)%和(52 ± 16)%:结论:在 B 模式图像质量良好的情况下,echoPIV 可以可靠地估算左心室血流,其显示的时空速度分布与 4D 血流 MRI 相当。两种模式都有各自的优势和局限性:echoPIV能捕捉到搏动间的变异性,具有更高的时间分辨率,而磁共振成像对患者体重指数和解剖结构的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of Left Ventricular High Frame Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry against 4D Flow MRI in Patients

Objective

Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for in vivo left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.

Methods

We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy (KE) and viscous energy loss (EL˙) were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), cosine similarity and Bland–Altman analysis.

Results

Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and NMAE of (14 ± 5)%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by (3 ± 6) cm/s in systole and (6 ± 10) cm/s in diastole. The KE and rate of EL˙ also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with NMAE of (23 ± 7)% and (52 ± 16)%.

Conclusion

Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Contents A Narrative Review of Image Processing Techniques Related to Prostate Ultrasound. Editorial Advisory Board A Review on Ultrasound-based Methods to Image the Distribution of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedical Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1