Yichuang Han , Daniel J. Bowen , Bernardo Loff Barreto , Robert. R. Zwaan , Mihai Strachinaru , Rob J. van der Geest , Alexander Hirsch , Annemien E. van den Bosch , Johan G. Bosch , Jason Voorneveld
{"title":"左心室高帧率回波粒子图像测速仪与患者四维血流磁共振成像的验证。","authors":"Yichuang Han , Daniel J. Bowen , Bernardo Loff Barreto , Robert. R. Zwaan , Mihai Strachinaru , Rob J. van der Geest , Alexander Hirsch , Annemien E. van den Bosch , Johan G. Bosch , Jason Voorneveld","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for <em>in vivo</em> left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy (<span><math><mtext>KE</mtext></math></span>) and viscous energy loss (<span><math><mover><mtext>EL</mtext><mi>˙</mi></mover></math></span>) were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), cosine similarity and Bland–Altman analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and NMAE of (14 ± 5)%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by (3 ± 6) cm/s in systole and (6 ± 10) cm/s in diastole. The <span><math><mtext>KE</mtext></math></span> and rate of <span><math><mover><mtext>EL</mtext><mi>˙</mi></mover></math></span> also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with NMAE of (23 ± 7)% and (52 ± 16)%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Left Ventricular High Frame Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry against 4D Flow MRI in Patients\",\"authors\":\"Yichuang Han , Daniel J. Bowen , Bernardo Loff Barreto , Robert. R. Zwaan , Mihai Strachinaru , Rob J. van der Geest , Alexander Hirsch , Annemien E. van den Bosch , Johan G. Bosch , Jason Voorneveld\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for <em>in vivo</em> left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy (<span><math><mtext>KE</mtext></math></span>) and viscous energy loss (<span><math><mover><mtext>EL</mtext><mi>˙</mi></mover></math></span>) were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), cosine similarity and Bland–Altman analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and NMAE of (14 ± 5)%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by (3 ± 6) cm/s in systole and (6 ± 10) cm/s in diastole. The <span><math><mtext>KE</mtext></math></span> and rate of <span><math><mover><mtext>EL</mtext><mi>˙</mi></mover></math></span> also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with NMAE of (23 ± 7)% and (52 ± 16)%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003594\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of Left Ventricular High Frame Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry against 4D Flow MRI in Patients
Objective
Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for in vivo left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.
Methods
We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy () and viscous energy loss () were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), cosine similarity and Bland–Altman analysis.
Results
Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and NMAE of (14 ± 5)%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by (3 ± 6) cm/s in systole and (6 ± 10) cm/s in diastole. The and rate of also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with NMAE of (23 ± 7)% and (52 ± 16)%.
Conclusion
Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.