在门诊人工真空吸引术治疗流产或不全流产过程中利用虚拟现实技术控制疼痛和焦虑:一项混合方法试验。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1080/13625187.2024.2410838
Anna Alexandra McDougall, Eleanor Bard, Ora Jesner, Shereen Ibrahim, Schahrazed Rouabhi, Nandita Deo
{"title":"在门诊人工真空吸引术治疗流产或不全流产过程中利用虚拟现实技术控制疼痛和焦虑:一项混合方法试验。","authors":"Anna Alexandra McDougall, Eleanor Bard, Ora Jesner, Shereen Ibrahim, Schahrazed Rouabhi, Nandita Deo","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2024.2410838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of virtual reality (VR) as a distraction technique in the management of acute pain and anxiety during outpatient uterine aspiration using a manual vacuum aspirator (MVA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This mixed methods study included a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial and structured individual interviews. Of the 72 patients approached, 50 consenting, eligible participants were randomised to VR intervention (immersive video content 'The Forest of Serenity') or standard care during MVA for the management of miscarriage or incomplete abortion from July 2021-July 2022 across two university hospitals in London, UK. Expected and actual pain scores, and anxiety before and after the procedure were measured as numeric rating scores (0-10). Structured interviews were undertaken after the procedure in women randomised to VR. Statistical analysis of pain and anxiety scores were by intention-to-treat including all randomised participants, using Stata-12 software. Qualitative analysis was achieved by thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in pain or anxiety scores reported by participants randomised to VR compared with standard care. Mean worst pain scores were 5.98 and 6.88 in the standard care and VR groups respectively (p-value 0.13), with corresponding anxiety scores at the end of the procedure 3.94 and 3.3 (p-value 0.57). Qualitative analysis from interviews was highly favourable from women randomised to VR with all participants reporting a positive experience. 90% (18/20) of participants reported that VR reduced their anxiety and 71% (15/21) stated that it helped to reduce or distract from their pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While virtual reality did not decrease pain or anxiety scores during MVA, it is a feasible and acceptable option that may improve patient experience.</p><p><strong>Short condensation: </strong>Randomisation to VR during MVA did not reduce pain or anxiety scores. However, at structured interview most participants reported that VR reduced their anxiety and reduced or distracted them from their pain. VR is a feasible and acceptable option that may improve patient experience during MVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual reality for the management of pain and anxiety during outpatient manual vacuum aspiration for miscarriage or incomplete abortion: a mixed methods trial.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Alexandra McDougall, Eleanor Bard, Ora Jesner, Shereen Ibrahim, Schahrazed Rouabhi, Nandita Deo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2024.2410838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of virtual reality (VR) as a distraction technique in the management of acute pain and anxiety during outpatient uterine aspiration using a manual vacuum aspirator (MVA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This mixed methods study included a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial and structured individual interviews. Of the 72 patients approached, 50 consenting, eligible participants were randomised to VR intervention (immersive video content 'The Forest of Serenity') or standard care during MVA for the management of miscarriage or incomplete abortion from July 2021-July 2022 across two university hospitals in London, UK. Expected and actual pain scores, and anxiety before and after the procedure were measured as numeric rating scores (0-10). Structured interviews were undertaken after the procedure in women randomised to VR. Statistical analysis of pain and anxiety scores were by intention-to-treat including all randomised participants, using Stata-12 software. Qualitative analysis was achieved by thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in pain or anxiety scores reported by participants randomised to VR compared with standard care. Mean worst pain scores were 5.98 and 6.88 in the standard care and VR groups respectively (p-value 0.13), with corresponding anxiety scores at the end of the procedure 3.94 and 3.3 (p-value 0.57). Qualitative analysis from interviews was highly favourable from women randomised to VR with all participants reporting a positive experience. 90% (18/20) of participants reported that VR reduced their anxiety and 71% (15/21) stated that it helped to reduce or distract from their pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While virtual reality did not decrease pain or anxiety scores during MVA, it is a feasible and acceptable option that may improve patient experience.</p><p><strong>Short condensation: </strong>Randomisation to VR during MVA did not reduce pain or anxiety scores. However, at structured interview most participants reported that VR reduced their anxiety and reduced or distracted them from their pain. VR is a feasible and acceptable option that may improve patient experience during MVA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2024.2410838\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2024.2410838","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估虚拟现实(VR)作为一种分散注意力的技术,在门诊病人使用手动真空吸引器(MVA)进行子宫腔吸引术时控制急性疼痛和焦虑的有效性和可接受性:这项混合方法研究包括一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验和结构化个人访谈。从 2021 年 7 月到 2022 年 7 月,在英国伦敦的两家大学医院,72 名患者中的 50 名同意且符合条件的参与者被随机分配到 VR 干预(沉浸式视频内容 "宁静之林")或 MVA 期间的标准护理中,以治疗流产或不全流产。预期和实际疼痛评分以及手术前后的焦虑程度均以数字评分(0-10)进行测量。手术后对随机接受 VR 的妇女进行结构化访谈。疼痛和焦虑评分的统计分析采用意向治疗法,包括所有随机参与者,使用 Stata-12 软件。定性分析是通过对访谈记录进行主题分析实现的:结果:与标准治疗相比,随机接受 VR 治疗的参与者在疼痛和焦虑评分方面没有明显差异。标准护理组和 VR 组的平均最严重疼痛评分分别为 5.98 分和 6.88 分(P 值 0.13),手术结束时的相应焦虑评分分别为 3.94 分和 3.3 分(P 值 0.57)。从访谈中得出的定性分析结果显示,随机接受 VR 治疗的妇女对治疗非常满意,所有参与者都表示获得了积极的治疗体验。90%(18/20)的参与者表示虚拟现实减少了她们的焦虑,71%(15/21)的参与者表示虚拟现实有助于减轻或分散她们的疼痛感:结论:虽然虚拟现实并没有减少 MVA 期间的疼痛或焦虑评分,但它是一种可行且可接受的选择,可能会改善患者的体验:简短总结:在 MVA 期间随机使用虚拟现实技术并未降低疼痛或焦虑评分。然而,在结构化访谈中,大多数参与者表示 VR 可以减轻他们的焦虑,减轻或分散他们对疼痛的注意力。VR 是一种可行且可接受的选择,可改善 MVA 期间患者的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Virtual reality for the management of pain and anxiety during outpatient manual vacuum aspiration for miscarriage or incomplete abortion: a mixed methods trial.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of virtual reality (VR) as a distraction technique in the management of acute pain and anxiety during outpatient uterine aspiration using a manual vacuum aspirator (MVA).

Materials and methods: This mixed methods study included a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial and structured individual interviews. Of the 72 patients approached, 50 consenting, eligible participants were randomised to VR intervention (immersive video content 'The Forest of Serenity') or standard care during MVA for the management of miscarriage or incomplete abortion from July 2021-July 2022 across two university hospitals in London, UK. Expected and actual pain scores, and anxiety before and after the procedure were measured as numeric rating scores (0-10). Structured interviews were undertaken after the procedure in women randomised to VR. Statistical analysis of pain and anxiety scores were by intention-to-treat including all randomised participants, using Stata-12 software. Qualitative analysis was achieved by thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.

Results: There was no significant difference in pain or anxiety scores reported by participants randomised to VR compared with standard care. Mean worst pain scores were 5.98 and 6.88 in the standard care and VR groups respectively (p-value 0.13), with corresponding anxiety scores at the end of the procedure 3.94 and 3.3 (p-value 0.57). Qualitative analysis from interviews was highly favourable from women randomised to VR with all participants reporting a positive experience. 90% (18/20) of participants reported that VR reduced their anxiety and 71% (15/21) stated that it helped to reduce or distract from their pain.

Conclusion: While virtual reality did not decrease pain or anxiety scores during MVA, it is a feasible and acceptable option that may improve patient experience.

Short condensation: Randomisation to VR during MVA did not reduce pain or anxiety scores. However, at structured interview most participants reported that VR reduced their anxiety and reduced or distracted them from their pain. VR is a feasible and acceptable option that may improve patient experience during MVA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1