临床医生对 2021 年 USPSTF 关于 45-49 岁平均风险成人结直肠癌筛查建议的回应。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003
Joseph Carter Powers, Michael B Rothberg, Jeffrey D Kovach, Nicholas J Casacchia, Elizabeth Stanley, Kathryn A Martinez
{"title":"临床医生对 2021 年 USPSTF 关于 45-49 岁平均风险成人结直肠癌筛查建议的回应。","authors":"Joseph Carter Powers, Michael B Rothberg, Jeffrey D Kovach, Nicholas J Casacchia, Elizabeth Stanley, Kathryn A Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2021, the USPSTF lowered the recommended age of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation from 50 to 45 years. We assessed clinician response to the updated guideline in a major health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of average-risk, CRC screening-naïve adults aged 45-50 years with a primary care appointment between July 2018 and February 2023. We defined the pre-guideline change period as July 2018-February 2020 (pre-period) and the post-guideline change period as July 2021-February 2023 (post-period). Clinician ordering of any CRC screening type was assessed. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a patient receiving a screening order, including an interaction between age (45-49 years versus 50 years) and time-period (pre- versus post-guideline change.) Variation in screening orders were also described by calendar quarter and clinician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 28,114 patients in the pre-period and 22,509 in the post-period. Compared to patients aged 40-49 years in the pre-period, those in the post-period were more likely to have screening ordered (IRR:12.1; 95%CI:11.3-13.0). The screening ordering rate increased for 50-year-olds from the pre- to the post-period (IRR:1.08;95%CI:1.01-1.16) and was slightly higher than that of 45-49-year-olds in the post-period (IRR:1.08; 95%CI:1.02-1.14). All clinicians increased their ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years. Within five months of the guideline change, the ordering rate for 45-49-year-olds and 50-year-olds was nearly the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapidly following the guideline change, clinicians increased their screening ordering rate for 45-49-year-olds, indicating almost complete uptake of the recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician response to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in average risk adults aged 45-49 years.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Carter Powers, Michael B Rothberg, Jeffrey D Kovach, Nicholas J Casacchia, Elizabeth Stanley, Kathryn A Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2021, the USPSTF lowered the recommended age of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation from 50 to 45 years. We assessed clinician response to the updated guideline in a major health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of average-risk, CRC screening-naïve adults aged 45-50 years with a primary care appointment between July 2018 and February 2023. We defined the pre-guideline change period as July 2018-February 2020 (pre-period) and the post-guideline change period as July 2021-February 2023 (post-period). Clinician ordering of any CRC screening type was assessed. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a patient receiving a screening order, including an interaction between age (45-49 years versus 50 years) and time-period (pre- versus post-guideline change.) Variation in screening orders were also described by calendar quarter and clinician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 28,114 patients in the pre-period and 22,509 in the post-period. Compared to patients aged 40-49 years in the pre-period, those in the post-period were more likely to have screening ordered (IRR:12.1; 95%CI:11.3-13.0). The screening ordering rate increased for 50-year-olds from the pre- to the post-period (IRR:1.08;95%CI:1.01-1.16) and was slightly higher than that of 45-49-year-olds in the post-period (IRR:1.08; 95%CI:1.02-1.14). All clinicians increased their ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years. Within five months of the guideline change, the ordering rate for 45-49-year-olds and 50-year-olds was nearly the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapidly following the guideline change, clinicians increased their screening ordering rate for 45-49-year-olds, indicating almost complete uptake of the recommendation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:2021 年,USPSTF 将结肠直肠癌 (CRC) 筛查的建议开始年龄从 50 岁降至 45 岁。我们评估了一家大型医疗系统的临床医生对更新指南的反应:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2018 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月期间接受初级保健预约的 45-50 岁平均风险、未接受过 CRC 筛查的成年人。我们将指南变更前时期定义为 2018 年 7 月至 2020 年 2 月(前时期),指南变更后时期定义为 2021 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月(后时期)。对临床医生订购的任何一种 CRC 筛查类型进行了评估。混合效应泊松回归用于模拟患者接受筛查指令的发病率比(IRR),包括年龄(45-49 岁与 50 岁)和时间段(指南变更前与变更后)之间的交互作用:结果:前一时期有 28,114 名患者,后一时期有 22,509 名患者。与前期的 40-49 岁患者相比,后期的患者更有可能接受筛查(IRR:12.1;95%CI:11.3-13.0)。从前期到后期,50 岁人群的筛查下单率有所上升(IRR:1.08; 95%CI:1.01-1.16),后期略高于 45-49 岁人群(IRR:1.08; 95%CI:1.02-1.14)。所有临床医生都提高了 45-49 岁患者的下单率。在指南变更后的五个月内,45-49 岁患者和 50 岁患者的下单率几乎相同:结论:指南变更后,临床医生迅速提高了 45-49 岁患者的筛查下单率,表明该建议几乎已被完全采纳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinician response to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in average risk adults aged 45-49 years.

Introduction: In 2021, the USPSTF lowered the recommended age of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation from 50 to 45 years. We assessed clinician response to the updated guideline in a major health system.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of average-risk, CRC screening-naïve adults aged 45-50 years with a primary care appointment between July 2018 and February 2023. We defined the pre-guideline change period as July 2018-February 2020 (pre-period) and the post-guideline change period as July 2021-February 2023 (post-period). Clinician ordering of any CRC screening type was assessed. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a patient receiving a screening order, including an interaction between age (45-49 years versus 50 years) and time-period (pre- versus post-guideline change.) Variation in screening orders were also described by calendar quarter and clinician.

Results: There were 28,114 patients in the pre-period and 22,509 in the post-period. Compared to patients aged 40-49 years in the pre-period, those in the post-period were more likely to have screening ordered (IRR:12.1; 95%CI:11.3-13.0). The screening ordering rate increased for 50-year-olds from the pre- to the post-period (IRR:1.08;95%CI:1.01-1.16) and was slightly higher than that of 45-49-year-olds in the post-period (IRR:1.08; 95%CI:1.02-1.14). All clinicians increased their ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years. Within five months of the guideline change, the ordering rate for 45-49-year-olds and 50-year-olds was nearly the same.

Conclusions: Rapidly following the guideline change, clinicians increased their screening ordering rate for 45-49-year-olds, indicating almost complete uptake of the recommendation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
期刊最新文献
Chronic Opioid Use Following Implementation of Oregon's Medicaid Back Pain Policy. Clinician response to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in average risk adults aged 45-49 years. Cost-effectiveness of mandating calorie labels on prepared foods in supermarkets. Disparities in tobacco smoking and risk of cardiovascular disease in people with low socioeconomic status or serious psychological distress: A simulation analysis. Factors associated with mental healthcare utilization among United States military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder or depression symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1