Joseph Carter Powers, Michael B Rothberg, Jeffrey D Kovach, Nicholas J Casacchia, Elizabeth Stanley, Kathryn A Martinez
{"title":"临床医生对 2021 年 USPSTF 关于 45-49 岁平均风险成人结直肠癌筛查建议的回应。","authors":"Joseph Carter Powers, Michael B Rothberg, Jeffrey D Kovach, Nicholas J Casacchia, Elizabeth Stanley, Kathryn A Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2021, the USPSTF lowered the recommended age of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation from 50 to 45 years. This study assessed clinician response to the updated guideline in a major health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of average-risk, CRC screening-naïve adults aged 45-50 years with a primary care appointment between July 2018 and February 2023. The authors defined the pre-guideline change period as July 2018-February 2020 (pre-period) and the post-guideline change period as July 2021-February 2023 (post-period). Clinician ordering of any CRC screening type was assessed. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a patient receiving a screening order, including an interaction between age (45-49 years versus 50 years) and time period (pre- versus post-guideline change.) Variation in screening orders were also described by calendar quarter and clinician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 28,114 patients in the pre-period and 22,509 in the post-period. Compared to patients aged 40-49 years in the pre-period, those in the post-period were more likely to have screening ordered (IRR=12.1; 95% CI=11.3-13.0). The screening ordering rate increased for patients aged 50 years from the pre- to the post-period (IRR=1.08; 95% CI=1.01, 1.16) and was slightly higher than that of patients aged 45-49 years in the post-period (IRR=1.08; 95% CI=1.02, 1.14). All clinicians increased their ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years. Within 5 months of the guideline change, the ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years and 50 years was nearly the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapidly following the guideline change, clinicians increased their screening ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years, indicating almost complete uptake of the recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"264-271"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Response to the 2021 USPSTF Recommendation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Adults Aged 45-49 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Carter Powers, Michael B Rothberg, Jeffrey D Kovach, Nicholas J Casacchia, Elizabeth Stanley, Kathryn A Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2021, the USPSTF lowered the recommended age of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation from 50 to 45 years. This study assessed clinician response to the updated guideline in a major health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of average-risk, CRC screening-naïve adults aged 45-50 years with a primary care appointment between July 2018 and February 2023. The authors defined the pre-guideline change period as July 2018-February 2020 (pre-period) and the post-guideline change period as July 2021-February 2023 (post-period). Clinician ordering of any CRC screening type was assessed. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a patient receiving a screening order, including an interaction between age (45-49 years versus 50 years) and time period (pre- versus post-guideline change.) Variation in screening orders were also described by calendar quarter and clinician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 28,114 patients in the pre-period and 22,509 in the post-period. Compared to patients aged 40-49 years in the pre-period, those in the post-period were more likely to have screening ordered (IRR=12.1; 95% CI=11.3-13.0). The screening ordering rate increased for patients aged 50 years from the pre- to the post-period (IRR=1.08; 95% CI=1.01, 1.16) and was slightly higher than that of patients aged 45-49 years in the post-period (IRR=1.08; 95% CI=1.02, 1.14). All clinicians increased their ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years. Within 5 months of the guideline change, the ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years and 50 years was nearly the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapidly following the guideline change, clinicians increased their screening ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years, indicating almost complete uptake of the recommendation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"264-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinician Response to the 2021 USPSTF Recommendation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Adults Aged 45-49 Years.
Introduction: In 2021, the USPSTF lowered the recommended age of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation from 50 to 45 years. This study assessed clinician response to the updated guideline in a major health system.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of average-risk, CRC screening-naïve adults aged 45-50 years with a primary care appointment between July 2018 and February 2023. The authors defined the pre-guideline change period as July 2018-February 2020 (pre-period) and the post-guideline change period as July 2021-February 2023 (post-period). Clinician ordering of any CRC screening type was assessed. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a patient receiving a screening order, including an interaction between age (45-49 years versus 50 years) and time period (pre- versus post-guideline change.) Variation in screening orders were also described by calendar quarter and clinician.
Results: There were 28,114 patients in the pre-period and 22,509 in the post-period. Compared to patients aged 40-49 years in the pre-period, those in the post-period were more likely to have screening ordered (IRR=12.1; 95% CI=11.3-13.0). The screening ordering rate increased for patients aged 50 years from the pre- to the post-period (IRR=1.08; 95% CI=1.01, 1.16) and was slightly higher than that of patients aged 45-49 years in the post-period (IRR=1.08; 95% CI=1.02, 1.14). All clinicians increased their ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years. Within 5 months of the guideline change, the ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years and 50 years was nearly the same.
Conclusions: Rapidly following the guideline change, clinicians increased their screening ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years, indicating almost complete uptake of the recommendation.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.