Sammar Ghannam MD, MPH , Varshaa Koneru MD , Patrick Karabon , Rachel Darling MD , Kenneth A. Kist MD , Pamela Otto MD , Thanh Van MD
{"title":"探索光声成像在区分良性和恶性乳腺肿块中的实用性:第二代研究。","authors":"Sammar Ghannam MD, MPH , Varshaa Koneru MD , Patrick Karabon , Rachel Darling MD , Kenneth A. Kist MD , Pamela Otto MD , Thanh Van MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The combination of functional biologic data and imaging appearance has the potential to add diagnostic information to help the radiologist evaluate breast masses in an efficient, effective, and cost-conscious manner. This is the first clinical evaluation of the Gen 2(Model 9100, 8101) Imagio® System to assess image quality with both the stand-alone internal ultrasound (IUS), ultrasound-only transducer, and the Optoacoustic/Ultrasound (OA/US) duplex probe <span><span>1</span></span>, <span><span>2</span></span>. This study assesses palpable and non-palpable breast abnormalities in patients who are referred for diagnostic breast ultrasound work-up. This study is intended to confirm the clinical acceptability of modifications made to the Imagio® System ultrasound component following Premarket Approval (PMA) of the Imagio® Gen 1 version.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This prospective, single-arm, non-randomized study included 38 patients presenting with a palpable lump and/or imaging abnormality detected at a single investigational site. Each patient had the breast, and if indicated, the axillary lymph nodes imaged with the Gen 2 Imagio® system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For patients with SenoGram®-predicted Likelihood of Malignancy (LOM) and pathology available (N = 23), observed sensitivity was 100.0% (9/9) with a confidence interval of (66.4%, 100.0%), using a SenoGram®-predicted False Negative Rate (FNR) cut-off of ≤ 2%. Observed specificity was 64.3% (9/14) (Confidence Interval: 35.1%, 87.2%), using a SenoGram®-predicted FNR cut-off of ≤ 2%. At 98% fixed sensitivity, the specificity (fSp) for OA/US + SG was 100.0% while it was 0.0% for IUS. The absolute gain in fSp was 100.0%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combining structure with morphology can increase specificity without decreasing sensitivity in a real-world setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 634-650"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Utility of Optoacoustic Imaging in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: Gen 2 Study\",\"authors\":\"Sammar Ghannam MD, MPH , Varshaa Koneru MD , Patrick Karabon , Rachel Darling MD , Kenneth A. Kist MD , Pamela Otto MD , Thanh Van MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The combination of functional biologic data and imaging appearance has the potential to add diagnostic information to help the radiologist evaluate breast masses in an efficient, effective, and cost-conscious manner. This is the first clinical evaluation of the Gen 2(Model 9100, 8101) Imagio® System to assess image quality with both the stand-alone internal ultrasound (IUS), ultrasound-only transducer, and the Optoacoustic/Ultrasound (OA/US) duplex probe <span><span>1</span></span>, <span><span>2</span></span>. This study assesses palpable and non-palpable breast abnormalities in patients who are referred for diagnostic breast ultrasound work-up. This study is intended to confirm the clinical acceptability of modifications made to the Imagio® System ultrasound component following Premarket Approval (PMA) of the Imagio® Gen 1 version.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This prospective, single-arm, non-randomized study included 38 patients presenting with a palpable lump and/or imaging abnormality detected at a single investigational site. Each patient had the breast, and if indicated, the axillary lymph nodes imaged with the Gen 2 Imagio® system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For patients with SenoGram®-predicted Likelihood of Malignancy (LOM) and pathology available (N = 23), observed sensitivity was 100.0% (9/9) with a confidence interval of (66.4%, 100.0%), using a SenoGram®-predicted False Negative Rate (FNR) cut-off of ≤ 2%. Observed specificity was 64.3% (9/14) (Confidence Interval: 35.1%, 87.2%), using a SenoGram®-predicted FNR cut-off of ≤ 2%. At 98% fixed sensitivity, the specificity (fSp) for OA/US + SG was 100.0% while it was 0.0% for IUS. The absolute gain in fSp was 100.0%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combining structure with morphology can increase specificity without decreasing sensitivity in a real-world setting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 634-650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224006548\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224006548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the Utility of Optoacoustic Imaging in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: Gen 2 Study
Rationale and Objectives
The combination of functional biologic data and imaging appearance has the potential to add diagnostic information to help the radiologist evaluate breast masses in an efficient, effective, and cost-conscious manner. This is the first clinical evaluation of the Gen 2(Model 9100, 8101) Imagio® System to assess image quality with both the stand-alone internal ultrasound (IUS), ultrasound-only transducer, and the Optoacoustic/Ultrasound (OA/US) duplex probe 1, 2. This study assesses palpable and non-palpable breast abnormalities in patients who are referred for diagnostic breast ultrasound work-up. This study is intended to confirm the clinical acceptability of modifications made to the Imagio® System ultrasound component following Premarket Approval (PMA) of the Imagio® Gen 1 version.
Materials and Methods
This prospective, single-arm, non-randomized study included 38 patients presenting with a palpable lump and/or imaging abnormality detected at a single investigational site. Each patient had the breast, and if indicated, the axillary lymph nodes imaged with the Gen 2 Imagio® system.
Results
For patients with SenoGram®-predicted Likelihood of Malignancy (LOM) and pathology available (N = 23), observed sensitivity was 100.0% (9/9) with a confidence interval of (66.4%, 100.0%), using a SenoGram®-predicted False Negative Rate (FNR) cut-off of ≤ 2%. Observed specificity was 64.3% (9/14) (Confidence Interval: 35.1%, 87.2%), using a SenoGram®-predicted FNR cut-off of ≤ 2%. At 98% fixed sensitivity, the specificity (fSp) for OA/US + SG was 100.0% while it was 0.0% for IUS. The absolute gain in fSp was 100.0%.
Conclusion
Combining structure with morphology can increase specificity without decreasing sensitivity in a real-world setting.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.