在对以蒙特梭利为基础的痴呆症患者干预措施的评估中利用痴呆症护理图。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae135
Jennifer M Kinney, Leah M Janssen, Kathleen M Farfsing, Michael R Hughes
{"title":"在对以蒙特梭利为基础的痴呆症患者干预措施的评估中利用痴呆症护理图。","authors":"Jennifer M Kinney, Leah M Janssen, Kathleen M Farfsing, Michael R Hughes","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Montessori-based interventions (MBIs) promote quality of life among older adults living with dementia. We used Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) to evaluate the impact of a small-scale MBI. DCM is a systematic observation tool that records the behavior and mood/engagement of individuals living with dementia and can be used to improve quality of care and well-being.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Pre- and post-intervention data from 15 care community residents compared: 1) residents' range and types of behaviors, 2) their mood/engagement and 3) staff behaviors that facilitated and impeded residents' personhood. In this mixed-methods study, deductive qualitative content analysis of DCM field notes further explored staff behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention, a significantly higher proportion of residents' behaviors had the potential to promote their well-being, although there was little change in mood/engagement while engaging in those behaviors. Post-intervention, there was also a significant increase in staff behaviors that facilitated, and a decrease in staff behaviors that impeded, residents' personhood. Further, post-intervention, staff interactions with residents were more open-ended and inclusive. Although some staff behaviors still excluded residents, the exclusion was more benign than pre-intervention.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>DCM documented incremental changes toward person-centered care, and DCM field notes provided insight into missed opportunities for effective staff interactions with residents. Taken together, findings provide additional support for the use of MBIs and highlights the usefulness of DCM, especially its associated field notes, to help researchers and practitioners create environments that promote the personhood that individuals living with dementia deserve.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capitalizing on Dementia Care Mapping in an Evaluation of a Montessori-Based Intervention for Individuals Living with Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer M Kinney, Leah M Janssen, Kathleen M Farfsing, Michael R Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnae135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Montessori-based interventions (MBIs) promote quality of life among older adults living with dementia. We used Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) to evaluate the impact of a small-scale MBI. DCM is a systematic observation tool that records the behavior and mood/engagement of individuals living with dementia and can be used to improve quality of care and well-being.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Pre- and post-intervention data from 15 care community residents compared: 1) residents' range and types of behaviors, 2) their mood/engagement and 3) staff behaviors that facilitated and impeded residents' personhood. In this mixed-methods study, deductive qualitative content analysis of DCM field notes further explored staff behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention, a significantly higher proportion of residents' behaviors had the potential to promote their well-being, although there was little change in mood/engagement while engaging in those behaviors. Post-intervention, there was also a significant increase in staff behaviors that facilitated, and a decrease in staff behaviors that impeded, residents' personhood. Further, post-intervention, staff interactions with residents were more open-ended and inclusive. Although some staff behaviors still excluded residents, the exclusion was more benign than pre-intervention.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>DCM documented incremental changes toward person-centered care, and DCM field notes provided insight into missed opportunities for effective staff interactions with residents. Taken together, findings provide additional support for the use of MBIs and highlights the usefulness of DCM, especially its associated field notes, to help researchers and practitioners create environments that promote the personhood that individuals living with dementia deserve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae135\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:基于蒙特梭利的干预(MBIs)可提高老年痴呆症患者的生活质量。我们使用痴呆症护理图谱(DCM)来评估小规模 MBI 的影响。DCM 是一种系统性观察工具,可记录痴呆症患者的行为和情绪/参与情况,并可用于改善护理质量和福祉:研究设计和方法:对 15 名护理社区居民干预前和干预后的数据进行比较:研究设计:对 15 名护理社区居民的干预前和干预后数据进行比较:1)居民的行为范围和类型;2)他们的情绪/参与度;3)工作人员促进和阻碍居民人格发展的行为。在这项混合方法研究中,对 DCM 现场记录的演绎定性内容分析进一步探讨了工作人员的行为:干预后,尽管居民在参与这些行为时的情绪/参与度变化不大,但有可能促进其福祉的居民行为比例明显增加。干预后,工作人员促进居民人格发展的行为显著增加,而妨碍居民人格发展的行为则有所减少。此外,干预后,工作人员与居民的互动更加开放和包容。虽然某些员工行为仍然排斥住户,但与干预前相比,排斥行为更加良性:DCM 记录了向 "以人为本 "的护理方向发展的渐进变化,DCM 的现场记录让我们深入了解了员工与住户进行有效互动时错失的机会。综上所述,研究结果为使用 MBI 提供了更多支持,并凸显了 DCM(尤其是其相关的现场记录)在帮助研究人员和从业人员创建促进痴呆症患者应有的人格的环境方面的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Capitalizing on Dementia Care Mapping in an Evaluation of a Montessori-Based Intervention for Individuals Living with Dementia.

Background and objectives: Montessori-based interventions (MBIs) promote quality of life among older adults living with dementia. We used Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) to evaluate the impact of a small-scale MBI. DCM is a systematic observation tool that records the behavior and mood/engagement of individuals living with dementia and can be used to improve quality of care and well-being.

Research design and methods: Pre- and post-intervention data from 15 care community residents compared: 1) residents' range and types of behaviors, 2) their mood/engagement and 3) staff behaviors that facilitated and impeded residents' personhood. In this mixed-methods study, deductive qualitative content analysis of DCM field notes further explored staff behaviors.

Results: Post-intervention, a significantly higher proportion of residents' behaviors had the potential to promote their well-being, although there was little change in mood/engagement while engaging in those behaviors. Post-intervention, there was also a significant increase in staff behaviors that facilitated, and a decrease in staff behaviors that impeded, residents' personhood. Further, post-intervention, staff interactions with residents were more open-ended and inclusive. Although some staff behaviors still excluded residents, the exclusion was more benign than pre-intervention.

Discussion and implications: DCM documented incremental changes toward person-centered care, and DCM field notes provided insight into missed opportunities for effective staff interactions with residents. Taken together, findings provide additional support for the use of MBIs and highlights the usefulness of DCM, especially its associated field notes, to help researchers and practitioners create environments that promote the personhood that individuals living with dementia deserve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Impacts on Physical Activity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Memory Problems: The Moderating Role of Walkable Neighborhood Destinations. "What Does 'Age-Friendly' Mean to You?": The Role of Microaggressions in a Retirement and Assisted Living Community. Caregiving Challenges from Persistent Pain Among Family Caregivers to People with Dementia. Usability Testing of the PACE-App to Support Family Caregivers in Managing Pain for People with Dementia. The Evolution in Dementia Caregiving Research: NIA's Catalyst Role.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1