David Woods, Damian Illing, Jue Cao, Rajshri M Bolson, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi
{"title":"手外科手术室面积分配:空间利用比较研究","authors":"David Woods, Damian Illing, Jue Cao, Rajshri M Bolson, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study evaluated operating room (OR) space required for various hand surgical procedures. We analysed the size requirements for hand surgical cases divided into four settings: (1) large OR setting requiring fluoroscopy and microsurgical equipment, (2) medium-sized OR setting for cases requiring fluoroscopy, (3) smaller OR setting and (4) minor procedural room without anaesthesia with the aim to describe room size requirements for hand surgery practices. <b>Methods:</b> A variety of hand surgical cases were selected: large cases (microvascular digit replantation), medium-sized cases (closed reduction percutaneous pinning [CRPP] of phalangeal fractures) and smaller cases (carpal tunnel release [CTR]) with and without anaesthesia. Space requirements were compared to general surgery cases (laparoscopic appendectomy) and general orthopaedic surgery cases (cephalomedullary nail [CMN]). Necessary operative equipment was measured (ft<sup>2</sup>) to calculate requirements for each procedure. <b>Results:</b> Large hand cases such as digit replantation necessitated the most OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), followed by general orthopaedic cases (CMN; 118 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium-sized hand cases (CRPP phalanx; 107 ft<sup>2</sup>), general surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (68 ft<sup>2</sup>), small hand cases (CTR; 85 ft<sup>2</sup>) and minor procedures (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). <b>Conclusions:</b> Hand procedures can be divided into major procedures requiring significant OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium procedures in standard OR suites (107 ft<sup>2</sup>), procedures in small ORs with anaesthesia (81 ft<sup>2</sup>) or office-based setting without anaesthesia (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). These findings help define space utilisation for hand procedures and may have practical implications related to efficiency, cost and patient safety in the hospital and outpatient setting. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Economic and Decision Analyses).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand Surgical Operating Room Size Allocation: A Comparative Space Utilisation Study.\",\"authors\":\"David Woods, Damian Illing, Jue Cao, Rajshri M Bolson, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424835525500055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study evaluated operating room (OR) space required for various hand surgical procedures. We analysed the size requirements for hand surgical cases divided into four settings: (1) large OR setting requiring fluoroscopy and microsurgical equipment, (2) medium-sized OR setting for cases requiring fluoroscopy, (3) smaller OR setting and (4) minor procedural room without anaesthesia with the aim to describe room size requirements for hand surgery practices. <b>Methods:</b> A variety of hand surgical cases were selected: large cases (microvascular digit replantation), medium-sized cases (closed reduction percutaneous pinning [CRPP] of phalangeal fractures) and smaller cases (carpal tunnel release [CTR]) with and without anaesthesia. Space requirements were compared to general surgery cases (laparoscopic appendectomy) and general orthopaedic surgery cases (cephalomedullary nail [CMN]). Necessary operative equipment was measured (ft<sup>2</sup>) to calculate requirements for each procedure. <b>Results:</b> Large hand cases such as digit replantation necessitated the most OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), followed by general orthopaedic cases (CMN; 118 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium-sized hand cases (CRPP phalanx; 107 ft<sup>2</sup>), general surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (68 ft<sup>2</sup>), small hand cases (CTR; 85 ft<sup>2</sup>) and minor procedures (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). <b>Conclusions:</b> Hand procedures can be divided into major procedures requiring significant OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium procedures in standard OR suites (107 ft<sup>2</sup>), procedures in small ORs with anaesthesia (81 ft<sup>2</sup>) or office-based setting without anaesthesia (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). These findings help define space utilisation for hand procedures and may have practical implications related to efficiency, cost and patient safety in the hospital and outpatient setting. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Economic and Decision Analyses).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hand Surgical Operating Room Size Allocation: A Comparative Space Utilisation Study.
Background: This study evaluated operating room (OR) space required for various hand surgical procedures. We analysed the size requirements for hand surgical cases divided into four settings: (1) large OR setting requiring fluoroscopy and microsurgical equipment, (2) medium-sized OR setting for cases requiring fluoroscopy, (3) smaller OR setting and (4) minor procedural room without anaesthesia with the aim to describe room size requirements for hand surgery practices. Methods: A variety of hand surgical cases were selected: large cases (microvascular digit replantation), medium-sized cases (closed reduction percutaneous pinning [CRPP] of phalangeal fractures) and smaller cases (carpal tunnel release [CTR]) with and without anaesthesia. Space requirements were compared to general surgery cases (laparoscopic appendectomy) and general orthopaedic surgery cases (cephalomedullary nail [CMN]). Necessary operative equipment was measured (ft2) to calculate requirements for each procedure. Results: Large hand cases such as digit replantation necessitated the most OR space (125 ft2), followed by general orthopaedic cases (CMN; 118 ft2), medium-sized hand cases (CRPP phalanx; 107 ft2), general surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (68 ft2), small hand cases (CTR; 85 ft2) and minor procedures (49 ft2). Conclusions: Hand procedures can be divided into major procedures requiring significant OR space (125 ft2), medium procedures in standard OR suites (107 ft2), procedures in small ORs with anaesthesia (81 ft2) or office-based setting without anaesthesia (49 ft2). These findings help define space utilisation for hand procedures and may have practical implications related to efficiency, cost and patient safety in the hospital and outpatient setting. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Economic and Decision Analyses).