Harnoor-Khroud Dhillon, Djamila M Rojoa, Zaid Raheman, Nicholas Cereceda Monteoliva, Govind Dhillon, Firas J Raheman
{"title":"使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)关节造影术治疗腕部韧带损伤--诊断测试准确性 Meta 分析。","authors":"Harnoor-Khroud Dhillon, Djamila M Rojoa, Zaid Raheman, Nicholas Cereceda Monteoliva, Govind Dhillon, Firas J Raheman","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diagnosis of ligamentous wrist injuries can be challenging with the absence of dynamic instability on radiographs. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) arthrography in diagnosing scapholunate ligament (SLL), lunotriquetral ligament (LTL) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review and literature search were conducted in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42024517655). A mixed-effects logistic regression bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were constructed to determine diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography. <b>Results:</b> We identified five studies assessing the accuracy of CBCT arthrography against wrist arthrography or intraoperative findings as reference standard. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of CBCT arthrography was 93% (95% CI 40-100) and 91% (95% CI 81-96) for SLL injuries, 83% (95% CI 37-98) and 64% (95% CI 42-81) for LTL injuries and 78% (95% CI 57-91) and 80% (95% CI 54-93) for TFCC injuries. The area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), showing an excellent diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography in SLL injuries. CBCT arthrography had an estimated mean effective dose of 3.2 mSv (2.0-4.8). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our study confirms that CBCT arthrography has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for wrist ligamentous injuries with comparably high sensitivity to conventional arthrography and a better specificity. While further studies with more robust methodology are required to support its implementation in clinical practice, our analysis shows that it is a reliable option and has a promising future. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Arthrography for Wrist Ligamentous Injuries - A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Harnoor-Khroud Dhillon, Djamila M Rojoa, Zaid Raheman, Nicholas Cereceda Monteoliva, Govind Dhillon, Firas J Raheman\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424835525500067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diagnosis of ligamentous wrist injuries can be challenging with the absence of dynamic instability on radiographs. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) arthrography in diagnosing scapholunate ligament (SLL), lunotriquetral ligament (LTL) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review and literature search were conducted in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42024517655). A mixed-effects logistic regression bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were constructed to determine diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography. <b>Results:</b> We identified five studies assessing the accuracy of CBCT arthrography against wrist arthrography or intraoperative findings as reference standard. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of CBCT arthrography was 93% (95% CI 40-100) and 91% (95% CI 81-96) for SLL injuries, 83% (95% CI 37-98) and 64% (95% CI 42-81) for LTL injuries and 78% (95% CI 57-91) and 80% (95% CI 54-93) for TFCC injuries. The area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), showing an excellent diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography in SLL injuries. CBCT arthrography had an estimated mean effective dose of 3.2 mSv (2.0-4.8). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our study confirms that CBCT arthrography has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for wrist ligamentous injuries with comparably high sensitivity to conventional arthrography and a better specificity. While further studies with more robust methodology are required to support its implementation in clinical practice, our analysis shows that it is a reliable option and has a promising future. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Diagnostic).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腕部韧带损伤的诊断具有挑战性,因为在X光片上没有动态不稳定性。我们的目的是评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)关节造影术诊断肩胛韧带(SLL)、月锁韧带(LTL)和三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)损伤的准确性。方法:按照系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行了系统综述和文献检索,并在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42024517655)。该研究采用混合效应逻辑回归双变量模型来估算灵敏度和特异度,并构建了分层总结接收者操作特征曲线(HSROC)来确定CBCT关节造影的诊断准确性。结果:我们发现有五项研究评估了 CBCT 关节造影与腕关节造影或术中发现作为参考标准的准确性。CBCT关节造影对SLL损伤的敏感性和特异性的汇总估计分别为93%(95% CI 40-100)和91%(95% CI 81-96),对LTL损伤的敏感性和特异性分别为83%(95% CI 37-98)和64%(95% CI 42-81),对TFCC损伤的敏感性和特异性分别为78%(95% CI 57-91)和80%(95% CI 54-93)。曲线下面积为 0.91(95% CI 0.89-0.94),表明 CBCT 关节造影对 SLL 损伤的诊断准确性极高。CBCT 关节造影的估计平均有效剂量为 3.2 mSv (2.0-4.8)。结论:我们的研究证实,CBCT 关节造影术对腕关节韧带损伤具有极高的诊断准确性,其敏感性和特异性与传统关节造影术相当。虽然还需要更多采用更可靠方法的研究来支持其在临床实践中的应用,但我们的分析表明,它是一种可靠的选择,而且前景广阔。证据等级:三级(诊断)。
The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Arthrography for Wrist Ligamentous Injuries - A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis.
Background: Diagnosis of ligamentous wrist injuries can be challenging with the absence of dynamic instability on radiographs. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) arthrography in diagnosing scapholunate ligament (SLL), lunotriquetral ligament (LTL) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries. Methods: A systematic review and literature search were conducted in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42024517655). A mixed-effects logistic regression bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were constructed to determine diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography. Results: We identified five studies assessing the accuracy of CBCT arthrography against wrist arthrography or intraoperative findings as reference standard. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of CBCT arthrography was 93% (95% CI 40-100) and 91% (95% CI 81-96) for SLL injuries, 83% (95% CI 37-98) and 64% (95% CI 42-81) for LTL injuries and 78% (95% CI 57-91) and 80% (95% CI 54-93) for TFCC injuries. The area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), showing an excellent diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography in SLL injuries. CBCT arthrography had an estimated mean effective dose of 3.2 mSv (2.0-4.8). Conclusions: Our study confirms that CBCT arthrography has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for wrist ligamentous injuries with comparably high sensitivity to conventional arthrography and a better specificity. While further studies with more robust methodology are required to support its implementation in clinical practice, our analysis shows that it is a reliable option and has a promising future. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).