颈动脉支架植入术与颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗有症状或无症状颅外颈动脉狭窄:一项全国队列研究。

Chayakrit Krittanawong MD, FACC , Song Peng Ang MD , Jonathan A Tangsrivimol MD , Yusuf Kamran Qadeer MD , Zhen Wang PhD , Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk MD , Umair Khalid MD , Samin K Sharma MD , Alan Dardik MD, PhD
{"title":"颈动脉支架植入术与颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗有症状或无症状颅外颈动脉狭窄:一项全国队列研究。","authors":"Chayakrit Krittanawong MD, FACC ,&nbsp;Song Peng Ang MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan A Tangsrivimol MD ,&nbsp;Yusuf Kamran Qadeer MD ,&nbsp;Zhen Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk MD ,&nbsp;Umair Khalid MD ,&nbsp;Samin K Sharma MD ,&nbsp;Alan Dardik MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Stroke is now the 5th leading cause of death in the United States, and carotid artery stenosis is the cause of about 20% to 25% of strokes. We hypothesized that CAS may be an alternative to CEA in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated the clinical characteristics, adverse events and mortality of patients with carotid artery stenosis comparing CEA vs. CAS using data from a national population-based cohort study from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We evaluated 374,875 patients with carotid stenosis, of whom 344,020 had asymptomatic carotid stenosis and 30,855 had symptomatic carotid stenosis. CAS was associated with higher mortality in both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, compared to CEA, with the trend slightly decreasing for both interventions from the years 2018-2020. CEA was associated with lower adverse events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, compared to CAS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our current data suggest a benefit of CEA over CAS for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis with lower complications, lower mortality and a higher rate of discharge. However, this is not a head-to-head comparison as it becomes selection bias for this procedure; therefore, further prospective head-to-head comparison between 2 groups in the same patient population is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"33 12","pages":"Article 108094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis: A national cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Chayakrit Krittanawong MD, FACC ,&nbsp;Song Peng Ang MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan A Tangsrivimol MD ,&nbsp;Yusuf Kamran Qadeer MD ,&nbsp;Zhen Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk MD ,&nbsp;Umair Khalid MD ,&nbsp;Samin K Sharma MD ,&nbsp;Alan Dardik MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Stroke is now the 5th leading cause of death in the United States, and carotid artery stenosis is the cause of about 20% to 25% of strokes. We hypothesized that CAS may be an alternative to CEA in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated the clinical characteristics, adverse events and mortality of patients with carotid artery stenosis comparing CEA vs. CAS using data from a national population-based cohort study from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We evaluated 374,875 patients with carotid stenosis, of whom 344,020 had asymptomatic carotid stenosis and 30,855 had symptomatic carotid stenosis. CAS was associated with higher mortality in both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, compared to CEA, with the trend slightly decreasing for both interventions from the years 2018-2020. CEA was associated with lower adverse events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, compared to CAS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our current data suggest a benefit of CEA over CAS for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis with lower complications, lower mortality and a higher rate of discharge. However, this is not a head-to-head comparison as it becomes selection bias for this procedure; therefore, further prospective head-to-head comparison between 2 groups in the same patient population is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\"33 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 108094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105230572400538X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105230572400538X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:中风目前是美国第五大死因,而颈动脉狭窄是导致约 20% 至 25% 中风的原因。我们假设,对于有症状和无症状的颈动脉狭窄患者来说,CAS 也许是 CEA 的替代方案:我们利用 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 30 日的全国人群队列研究数据,评估了颈动脉狭窄患者的临床特征、不良事件和死亡率,并对 CEA 与 CAS 进行了比较:在我们的研究中,我们评估了374,875名颈动脉狭窄患者,其中344,020人患有无症状颈动脉狭窄,30,855人患有有症状颈动脉狭窄。与CEA相比,CAS与无症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄的较高死亡率相关,从2018年至2020年,两种干预措施的死亡率均呈略微下降趋势。与CAS相比,CEA在无症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄中的不良事件均较低:我们目前的数据表明,对于无症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄,CEA比CAS更有利于降低并发症、降低死亡率和提高出院率。然而,这并不是头对头的比较,因为这种手术存在选择偏差;因此,需要进一步开展前瞻性研究,在同一患者群体中进行两组头对头的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis: A national cohort study

Introduction

Stroke is now the 5th leading cause of death in the United States, and carotid artery stenosis is the cause of about 20% to 25% of strokes. We hypothesized that CAS may be an alternative to CEA in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Methods

We evaluated the clinical characteristics, adverse events and mortality of patients with carotid artery stenosis comparing CEA vs. CAS using data from a national population-based cohort study from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2020.

Results

We evaluated 374,875 patients with carotid stenosis, of whom 344,020 had asymptomatic carotid stenosis and 30,855 had symptomatic carotid stenosis. CAS was associated with higher mortality in both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, compared to CEA, with the trend slightly decreasing for both interventions from the years 2018-2020. CEA was associated with lower adverse events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, compared to CAS.

Conclusions

Our current data suggest a benefit of CEA over CAS for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis with lower complications, lower mortality and a higher rate of discharge. However, this is not a head-to-head comparison as it becomes selection bias for this procedure; therefore, further prospective head-to-head comparison between 2 groups in the same patient population is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Spontaneous Neuronal Plasticity in the Contralateral Motor Cortex and Corticospinal Tract after Focal Cortical Infarction in Hypertensive Rats" [J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2020 Dec;29(12):105235/Manuscript NO:JSCVD-D-20-00162]. CONTEXTUAL AND CLINICAL FACTORS AS EXPLAINERS OF STROKE SEVERITY, RESIDUAL MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS, AND FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE DURING HOSPITALIZATION. CTP-Derived Venous Outflow Profiles Correlate With Tissue-Level Collaterals Regardless of Arterial Collateral Status. Relationship between hyoid-carotid distance, hyoid position and morphology and degree of stenosis and associated stroke. Stroke education: Engaging learners and the community to advance care for cerebrovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1