头颈癌的多节段适形计划优化

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03
Doaa Ali Salih Khudair, Haydar Hamza Obaid Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Ahmed Alazawy
{"title":"头颈癌的多节段适形计划优化","authors":"Doaa Ali Salih Khudair, Haydar Hamza Obaid Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Ahmed Alazawy","doi":"10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate better dose distribution with three-dimensional radiation therapy, and to compare it with multi-segmented treatment planning techniques in patients with head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The prospective study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised data of 50 patients with head and neck cancerous tumours from June 2021 to February 2022. There were 35 (70%) females and 15(30%) males. The mean age was 47.31 ± 3.95 years (range 19 - 69 years The patients had undergone computed tomography simulation. The images were exported to Monaco 5.1 for contouring by the radiation oncologist. The data was then imported to XiO planning system. Each plan was repeated twice; once with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and the other with field-in-field technique. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 50 patients whose data was analysed. The results showed significant differences between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and field-in-field techniques for dose coverage at 90% and 95% volumes (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the two techniques for 2Gy dose (p<0.05), but the difference was not significant for 5Gy dose (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The field-in-field treatment planning technique was found to be more effective than the threedimensional conformal radiation therapy technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":54369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","volume":"74 10 (Supple-8)","pages":"S10-S12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-segments conformal plan optimization for head and neck cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Doaa Ali Salih Khudair, Haydar Hamza Obaid Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Ahmed Alazawy\",\"doi\":\"10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate better dose distribution with three-dimensional radiation therapy, and to compare it with multi-segmented treatment planning techniques in patients with head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The prospective study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised data of 50 patients with head and neck cancerous tumours from June 2021 to February 2022. There were 35 (70%) females and 15(30%) males. The mean age was 47.31 ± 3.95 years (range 19 - 69 years The patients had undergone computed tomography simulation. The images were exported to Monaco 5.1 for contouring by the radiation oncologist. The data was then imported to XiO planning system. Each plan was repeated twice; once with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and the other with field-in-field technique. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 50 patients whose data was analysed. The results showed significant differences between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and field-in-field techniques for dose coverage at 90% and 95% volumes (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the two techniques for 2Gy dose (p<0.05), but the difference was not significant for 5Gy dose (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The field-in-field treatment planning technique was found to be more effective than the threedimensional conformal radiation therapy technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"74 10 (Supple-8)\",\"pages\":\"S10-S12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估三维放射治疗更好的剂量分布,并将其与头颈部癌症患者的多分区治疗计划技术进行比较:这项前瞻性研究在伊拉克巴格达的巴格达放射治疗与核医学中心进行,包括 50 名头颈部肿瘤患者的数据,时间为 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 2 月。其中女性 35 人(占 70%),男性 15 人(占 30%)。患者均接受过计算机断层扫描模拟。图像被导出到 Monaco 5.1,由放射肿瘤科医生绘制轮廓。然后将数据导入 XiO 计划系统。每个计划重复两次,一次采用三维适形放射治疗,另一次采用场中场技术。数据使用 SPSS 24 进行分析:对 50 名患者的数据进行了分析。结果显示,三维适形放疗与场中场技术在 90% 和 95% 容积的剂量覆盖率上存在明显差异(P0.05):结论:发现场中场治疗计划技术比三维适形放射治疗技术更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-segments conformal plan optimization for head and neck cancer.

Objective: To evaluate better dose distribution with three-dimensional radiation therapy, and to compare it with multi-segmented treatment planning techniques in patients with head and neck cancer.

Method: The prospective study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised data of 50 patients with head and neck cancerous tumours from June 2021 to February 2022. There were 35 (70%) females and 15(30%) males. The mean age was 47.31 ± 3.95 years (range 19 - 69 years The patients had undergone computed tomography simulation. The images were exported to Monaco 5.1 for contouring by the radiation oncologist. The data was then imported to XiO planning system. Each plan was repeated twice; once with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and the other with field-in-field technique. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.

Results: There were 50 patients whose data was analysed. The results showed significant differences between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and field-in-field techniques for dose coverage at 90% and 95% volumes (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the two techniques for 2Gy dose (p<0.05), but the difference was not significant for 5Gy dose (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The field-in-field treatment planning technique was found to be more effective than the threedimensional conformal radiation therapy technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
983
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Primarily being a medical journal, JPMA publishes scholarly research focusing on the various fields in the areas of health and medical education. It publishes original research describing recent advances in health particularly clinical studies, clinical trials, assessments of pathogens of diagnostic importance, medical genetics and epidemiological studies. Review articles highlighting importance of various issues in the domain of public health, drug research and medical education are also accepted. As a leading journal of South Asia, JPMA remains cognizant of the recent advances in the rapidly growing fields of biomedical sciences, it invites and encourages scholars to write short reviews and invited editorials on the emerging issues. We particularly aim to promote health standards of developing countries by encouraging manuscript submissions on issues affecting the public health and health delivery services.
期刊最新文献
Alteplase vs. Tenecteplase: An In-depth Analysis of Their Relative Effectiveness in Treating Acute Ischaemic Stroke. Beyond Dialysis: Reshaping CKD Paradigms in Developing Nations. Breaking down barriers; unravelling the root causes and effects of brain drain in Pakistan. Cardiac Syndrome X - A mystery to worry about. Caring in crisis: Addressing patient safety, burnout, and long hours in healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1