Doaa Ali Salih Khudair, Haydar Hamza Obaid Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Ahmed Alazawy
{"title":"头颈癌的多节段适形计划优化","authors":"Doaa Ali Salih Khudair, Haydar Hamza Obaid Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Ahmed Alazawy","doi":"10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate better dose distribution with three-dimensional radiation therapy, and to compare it with multi-segmented treatment planning techniques in patients with head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The prospective study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised data of 50 patients with head and neck cancerous tumours from June 2021 to February 2022. There were 35 (70%) females and 15(30%) males. The mean age was 47.31 ± 3.95 years (range 19 - 69 years The patients had undergone computed tomography simulation. The images were exported to Monaco 5.1 for contouring by the radiation oncologist. The data was then imported to XiO planning system. Each plan was repeated twice; once with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and the other with field-in-field technique. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 50 patients whose data was analysed. The results showed significant differences between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and field-in-field techniques for dose coverage at 90% and 95% volumes (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the two techniques for 2Gy dose (p<0.05), but the difference was not significant for 5Gy dose (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The field-in-field treatment planning technique was found to be more effective than the threedimensional conformal radiation therapy technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":54369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","volume":"74 10 (Supple-8)","pages":"S10-S12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-segments conformal plan optimization for head and neck cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Doaa Ali Salih Khudair, Haydar Hamza Obaid Alabedi, Nabaa Mohammad Ali Ahmed Alazawy\",\"doi\":\"10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate better dose distribution with three-dimensional radiation therapy, and to compare it with multi-segmented treatment planning techniques in patients with head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The prospective study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised data of 50 patients with head and neck cancerous tumours from June 2021 to February 2022. There were 35 (70%) females and 15(30%) males. The mean age was 47.31 ± 3.95 years (range 19 - 69 years The patients had undergone computed tomography simulation. The images were exported to Monaco 5.1 for contouring by the radiation oncologist. The data was then imported to XiO planning system. Each plan was repeated twice; once with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and the other with field-in-field technique. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 50 patients whose data was analysed. The results showed significant differences between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and field-in-field techniques for dose coverage at 90% and 95% volumes (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the two techniques for 2Gy dose (p<0.05), but the difference was not significant for 5Gy dose (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The field-in-field treatment planning technique was found to be more effective than the threedimensional conformal radiation therapy technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"74 10 (Supple-8)\",\"pages\":\"S10-S12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-segments conformal plan optimization for head and neck cancer.
Objective: To evaluate better dose distribution with three-dimensional radiation therapy, and to compare it with multi-segmented treatment planning techniques in patients with head and neck cancer.
Method: The prospective study was conducted at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised data of 50 patients with head and neck cancerous tumours from June 2021 to February 2022. There were 35 (70%) females and 15(30%) males. The mean age was 47.31 ± 3.95 years (range 19 - 69 years The patients had undergone computed tomography simulation. The images were exported to Monaco 5.1 for contouring by the radiation oncologist. The data was then imported to XiO planning system. Each plan was repeated twice; once with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and the other with field-in-field technique. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.
Results: There were 50 patients whose data was analysed. The results showed significant differences between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and field-in-field techniques for dose coverage at 90% and 95% volumes (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the two techniques for 2Gy dose (p<0.05), but the difference was not significant for 5Gy dose (p>0.05).
Conclusions: The field-in-field treatment planning technique was found to be more effective than the threedimensional conformal radiation therapy technique.
期刊介绍:
Primarily being a medical journal, JPMA publishes scholarly research focusing on the various fields in the areas of health and medical education. It publishes original research describing recent advances in health particularly clinical studies, clinical trials, assessments of pathogens of diagnostic importance, medical genetics and epidemiological studies. Review articles highlighting importance of various issues in the domain of public health, drug research and medical education are also accepted. As a leading journal of South Asia, JPMA remains cognizant of the recent advances in the rapidly growing fields of biomedical sciences, it invites and encourages scholars to write short reviews and invited editorials on the emerging issues. We particularly aim to promote health standards of developing countries by encouraging manuscript submissions on issues affecting the public health and health delivery services.