验证用于近侧碰撞的通用有限元车辆降压模型。

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Traffic Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1080/15389588.2024.2403717
Casey G Costa, Karan Devane, Joel D Stitzel, Johan Iraeus, Ashley A Weaver
{"title":"验证用于近侧碰撞的通用有限元车辆降压模型。","authors":"Casey G Costa, Karan Devane, Joel D Stitzel, Johan Iraeus, Ashley A Weaver","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2403717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Finite element (FE) reconstructions of motor vehicle crashes using human body models are effective tools for developing a better understanding of occupant kinematics and injuries in real-world lateral crash conditions, but current near-side reconstruction methods are limited by the paucity of full-scale FE vehicle models. The objective of this study was to validate a generic vehicle model equipped with left-side airbags and intrusion capability by simulating a series of near-side crash tests for a range of vehicles and assessing model accuracy using objective evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Moving deformable barrier crash tests were reconstructed for five common vehicle classifications (compact passenger, mid-size passenger, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and van) using an updated version of a previously developed simplified vehicle model. Unknown vehicle and intrusion properties (pretensioner force, seatback airbag pressure, curtain airbag pressure, door panel stiffness, ratio of dynamic-to-static intrusion, intrusion velocity, and intrusion scaling factor) were estimated by parameterizing them across 224 simulations per crash test using a Latin hypercube design of experiments. Model accuracy was assessed for 13 anthropomorphic test device signals using the Correlation and Analysis (CORA) objective rating method and injury metric comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum ratings of 0.69, 0.67, 0.52, 0.52, and 0.62 were achieved for the compact passenger, midsize passenger, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and van classifications, respectively. On average, the abdomen displayed the most accurate behavior (0.51 ± 0.12), followed by the thorax (0.50 ± 0.10) and head (0.50 ± 0.07). The pelvis displayed the least accurate behavior (0.46 ± 0.18) of any region. Reconstructions overpraedicted injury metrics in all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All vehicles achieved \"fair\" biofidelity ratings and the compact passenger and midsize passenger vehicles achieved \"good\" biofidelity ratings, validating them for kinematic evaluations with vehicle-to-vehicle nearside crash reconstructions. Regression models were developed for injuries and CORA ratings and can be used to optimize vehicle parameters in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a generic finite element vehicle buck model for near-side crashes.\",\"authors\":\"Casey G Costa, Karan Devane, Joel D Stitzel, Johan Iraeus, Ashley A Weaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2024.2403717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Finite element (FE) reconstructions of motor vehicle crashes using human body models are effective tools for developing a better understanding of occupant kinematics and injuries in real-world lateral crash conditions, but current near-side reconstruction methods are limited by the paucity of full-scale FE vehicle models. The objective of this study was to validate a generic vehicle model equipped with left-side airbags and intrusion capability by simulating a series of near-side crash tests for a range of vehicles and assessing model accuracy using objective evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Moving deformable barrier crash tests were reconstructed for five common vehicle classifications (compact passenger, mid-size passenger, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and van) using an updated version of a previously developed simplified vehicle model. Unknown vehicle and intrusion properties (pretensioner force, seatback airbag pressure, curtain airbag pressure, door panel stiffness, ratio of dynamic-to-static intrusion, intrusion velocity, and intrusion scaling factor) were estimated by parameterizing them across 224 simulations per crash test using a Latin hypercube design of experiments. Model accuracy was assessed for 13 anthropomorphic test device signals using the Correlation and Analysis (CORA) objective rating method and injury metric comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum ratings of 0.69, 0.67, 0.52, 0.52, and 0.62 were achieved for the compact passenger, midsize passenger, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and van classifications, respectively. On average, the abdomen displayed the most accurate behavior (0.51 ± 0.12), followed by the thorax (0.50 ± 0.10) and head (0.50 ± 0.07). The pelvis displayed the least accurate behavior (0.46 ± 0.18) of any region. Reconstructions overpraedicted injury metrics in all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All vehicles achieved \\\"fair\\\" biofidelity ratings and the compact passenger and midsize passenger vehicles achieved \\\"good\\\" biofidelity ratings, validating them for kinematic evaluations with vehicle-to-vehicle nearside crash reconstructions. Regression models were developed for injuries and CORA ratings and can be used to optimize vehicle parameters in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2403717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2403717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用人体模型对机动车碰撞进行有限元(FE)重构是更好地了解真实世界横向碰撞条件下乘员运动学和伤害的有效工具,但目前的近侧重构方法因缺乏全尺寸 FE 车辆模型而受到限制。本研究的目的是通过模拟一系列车辆的近侧碰撞试验,验证配备左侧安全气囊和入侵能力的通用车辆模型,并使用客观评估方法评估模型的准确性:方法:使用以前开发的简化车辆模型的更新版本,对五种常见车辆分类(紧凑型乘用车、中型乘用车、运动型多用途车、皮卡和面包车)重建了移动可变形壁障碰撞试验。对未知的车辆和入侵属性(预紧器力、座椅靠背安全气囊压力、帘式安全气囊压力、门板刚度、动态入侵与静态入侵之比、入侵速度和入侵比例因子)进行了估计,方法是使用拉丁超立方体实验设计对每次碰撞测试的 224 次模拟进行参数化。使用相关性和分析(CORA)客观评级法和伤害指标比较法,对 13 个拟人测试装置信号的模型准确性进行了评估:结果:紧凑型乘用车、中型乘用车、运动型多用途车、皮卡和面包车的最大评分分别为 0.69、0.67、0.52、0.52 和 0.62。平均而言,腹部的准确度最高(0.51 ± 0.12),其次是胸部(0.50 ± 0.10)和头部(0.50 ± 0.07)。在所有区域中,骨盆的精确度最低(0.46 ± 0.18)。在所有情况下,重建都高估了损伤指标:结论:所有车辆都达到了 "尚可 "的生物保真度评级,紧凑型乘用车和中型乘用车达到了 "良好 "的生物保真度评级,验证了它们可用于车辆间近侧碰撞重建的运动学评估。针对伤害和 CORA 评级开发了回归模型,可用于在今后的研究中优化车辆参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a generic finite element vehicle buck model for near-side crashes.

Objective: Finite element (FE) reconstructions of motor vehicle crashes using human body models are effective tools for developing a better understanding of occupant kinematics and injuries in real-world lateral crash conditions, but current near-side reconstruction methods are limited by the paucity of full-scale FE vehicle models. The objective of this study was to validate a generic vehicle model equipped with left-side airbags and intrusion capability by simulating a series of near-side crash tests for a range of vehicles and assessing model accuracy using objective evaluation methods.

Methods: Moving deformable barrier crash tests were reconstructed for five common vehicle classifications (compact passenger, mid-size passenger, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and van) using an updated version of a previously developed simplified vehicle model. Unknown vehicle and intrusion properties (pretensioner force, seatback airbag pressure, curtain airbag pressure, door panel stiffness, ratio of dynamic-to-static intrusion, intrusion velocity, and intrusion scaling factor) were estimated by parameterizing them across 224 simulations per crash test using a Latin hypercube design of experiments. Model accuracy was assessed for 13 anthropomorphic test device signals using the Correlation and Analysis (CORA) objective rating method and injury metric comparisons.

Results: Maximum ratings of 0.69, 0.67, 0.52, 0.52, and 0.62 were achieved for the compact passenger, midsize passenger, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and van classifications, respectively. On average, the abdomen displayed the most accurate behavior (0.51 ± 0.12), followed by the thorax (0.50 ± 0.10) and head (0.50 ± 0.07). The pelvis displayed the least accurate behavior (0.46 ± 0.18) of any region. Reconstructions overpraedicted injury metrics in all cases.

Conclusions: All vehicles achieved "fair" biofidelity ratings and the compact passenger and midsize passenger vehicles achieved "good" biofidelity ratings, validating them for kinematic evaluations with vehicle-to-vehicle nearside crash reconstructions. Regression models were developed for injuries and CORA ratings and can be used to optimize vehicle parameters in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Capturing signals of road traffic safety risk: based on the spatial-temporal correlation between traffic violations and crashes. The use of prescription medication and other drugs by New Zealand drivers with illegal blood alcohol levels. Unpacking the COVID-19 roadway fatality paradox: an analysis of motor vehicle crashes in Michigan 2019-2022. Texting, talking, trawling and tunes: Risk perceptions, phone dependence and different types of phone use while driving behaviors. Effect of load limiting the shoulder-belt on right-front passenger kinematics in oblique-offset and NCAP frontal crash tests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1