随机对照试验:比较有无进行心内超声心动图检查的经脐穿刺培训。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1111/pace.15081
Qi Guo, Caihua Sang, Yiwei Lai, Mingyang Gao, Xueyuan Guo, Wenli Dai, Songnan Li, Nian Liu, Song Zuo, Deyong Long, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma
{"title":"随机对照试验:比较有无进行心内超声心动图检查的经脐穿刺培训。","authors":"Qi Guo, Caihua Sang, Yiwei Lai, Mingyang Gao, Xueyuan Guo, Wenli Dai, Songnan Li, Nian Liu, Song Zuo, Deyong Long, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma","doi":"10.1111/pace.15081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been widely used in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of ICE in the training of transseptal puncture (TSP) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ICE-Training Study was a single-center, parallel-group, unmasked, randomized controlled trial registered in ChineseClinicalTrials.gov. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to different groups (1) the ICE simulator training group (ICE-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed under the guidance of both ICE and x-ray; and (2) the conventional simulator training group (Con-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed only under the guidance of x-ray. The trainees need to undergo the training stage and the evaluation stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2022 to December 2022, 18 consecutive fellows (age 32.4 ± 4.4 years, 12 males) without experience of TSP were included. The training period (16.9 ± 6.6 vs. 29.6 ± 8.7 times, p = 0.003) and the fluoroscopy time (120.3 ± 25.3 vs. 189.3 ± 40.2 s, p < 0.001) of the ICE-ST group was significantly shorter than that of the Con-ST group. No significant difference was found in the comprehensive performance of TSP in the ICE-ST group (composite score 96.7 ± 5.7) and the Con-ST group (composite score 95.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.62), but the selection of TSP sites in the ICE-ST group was commonly better than that in the Con-ST group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICE could improve the efficiency of TSP training and optimize the site of TSP to facilitate catheter manipulation in the ablation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2200058377.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Training of Transseptal Puncture With or Without Intracardiac Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Qi Guo, Caihua Sang, Yiwei Lai, Mingyang Gao, Xueyuan Guo, Wenli Dai, Songnan Li, Nian Liu, Song Zuo, Deyong Long, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.15081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been widely used in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of ICE in the training of transseptal puncture (TSP) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ICE-Training Study was a single-center, parallel-group, unmasked, randomized controlled trial registered in ChineseClinicalTrials.gov. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to different groups (1) the ICE simulator training group (ICE-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed under the guidance of both ICE and x-ray; and (2) the conventional simulator training group (Con-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed only under the guidance of x-ray. The trainees need to undergo the training stage and the evaluation stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2022 to December 2022, 18 consecutive fellows (age 32.4 ± 4.4 years, 12 males) without experience of TSP were included. The training period (16.9 ± 6.6 vs. 29.6 ± 8.7 times, p = 0.003) and the fluoroscopy time (120.3 ± 25.3 vs. 189.3 ± 40.2 s, p < 0.001) of the ICE-ST group was significantly shorter than that of the Con-ST group. No significant difference was found in the comprehensive performance of TSP in the ICE-ST group (composite score 96.7 ± 5.7) and the Con-ST group (composite score 95.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.62), but the selection of TSP sites in the ICE-ST group was commonly better than that in the Con-ST group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICE could improve the efficiency of TSP training and optimize the site of TSP to facilitate catheter manipulation in the ablation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2200058377.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心内超声心动图(ICE)已广泛应用于心房颤动(AF)的导管消融术。然而,ICE在经窦道穿刺(TSP)培训中的价值尚不明确:ICE-培训研究是一项在中国临床试验网(ChineseClinicalTrials.gov)注册的单中心、平行组、无掩蔽、随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配(1:1)到不同的组别:(1) ICE 模拟器训练组(ICE-ST),在 ICE 和 X 射线的引导下进行 TSP 训练和操作;(2) 传统模拟器训练组(Con-ST),仅在 X 射线的引导下进行 TSP 训练和操作。学员需要经历培训阶段和评估阶段:结果:从 2022 年 10 月至 2022 年 12 月,连续纳入了 18 名没有 TSP 经验的研究员(年龄(32.4±4.4)岁,12 名男性)。培训时间(16.9±6.6 对 29.6±8.7 次,P = 0.003)和透视时间(120.3±25.3 对 189.3±40.2 秒,P 结论:ICE 可以提高 TSP 的效率:ICE 可以提高 TSP 训练的效率,优化 TSP 的部位,便于消融过程中的导管操作:试验注册:ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier:ChiCTR2200058377。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Training of Transseptal Puncture With or Without Intracardiac Echocardiography.

Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been widely used in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of ICE in the training of transseptal puncture (TSP) is unclear.

Methods: ICE-Training Study was a single-center, parallel-group, unmasked, randomized controlled trial registered in ChineseClinicalTrials.gov. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to different groups (1) the ICE simulator training group (ICE-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed under the guidance of both ICE and x-ray; and (2) the conventional simulator training group (Con-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed only under the guidance of x-ray. The trainees need to undergo the training stage and the evaluation stage.

Results: From October 2022 to December 2022, 18 consecutive fellows (age 32.4 ± 4.4 years, 12 males) without experience of TSP were included. The training period (16.9 ± 6.6 vs. 29.6 ± 8.7 times, p = 0.003) and the fluoroscopy time (120.3 ± 25.3 vs. 189.3 ± 40.2 s, p < 0.001) of the ICE-ST group was significantly shorter than that of the Con-ST group. No significant difference was found in the comprehensive performance of TSP in the ICE-ST group (composite score 96.7 ± 5.7) and the Con-ST group (composite score 95.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.62), but the selection of TSP sites in the ICE-ST group was commonly better than that in the Con-ST group.

Conclusions: ICE could improve the efficiency of TSP training and optimize the site of TSP to facilitate catheter manipulation in the ablation.

Trial registration: ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2200058377.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Coronary Spasm Due to Pulsed Field Ablation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Recalled But Responsive: Easier Extraction of Recalled Leads. Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion: Beware the Left Atrial Appendage Isolation. Changes in QRS morphology during antidromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Exercise-induced type 1 Brugada pattern in a child.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1