改善为住院糖尿病患者提供的膳食中的宏量营养素构成:一项前后期混合方法观察研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1111/jhn.13375
Emma Armstrong, Rahul D. Barmanray, Adamandia Kriketos, Bridget Agius, Aimee Dow, Hilda Griffin, Spiros Fourlanos
{"title":"改善为住院糖尿病患者提供的膳食中的宏量营养素构成:一项前后期混合方法观察研究。","authors":"Emma Armstrong,&nbsp;Rahul D. Barmanray,&nbsp;Adamandia Kriketos,&nbsp;Bridget Agius,&nbsp;Aimee Dow,&nbsp;Hilda Griffin,&nbsp;Spiros Fourlanos","doi":"10.1111/jhn.13375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Providing meals which meet diverse needs of hospital inpatients is complex, contributing to challenges in optimising glycaemia. We developed menus that improved the appropriateness of macronutrient composition of meals for inpatients with diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative feedback from patients and healthcare professionals prompted the implementation of two new menus: ‘diabetes lifestyle’ and ‘diabetes high energy’. Quantitative nutrition analysis of meals provided to inpatients using new menus was compared to the regular menu. Qualitative surveys were repeated after the implementation of the new menus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nutrition analysis demonstrated that meals ordered from the diabetes lifestyle menu (mean energy: 7.85 MJ) comprised less total fat (71 vs. 74 vs. 64 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), saturated fat (34 vs. 36 vs. 31 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), carbohydrate (246 vs. 249 vs. 217 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and sugar (125 vs. 121 vs. 102 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to the regular (mean energy: 8.46 MJ) and diabetes high energy menus (mean energy: 8.70 MJ). Meals ordered from the diabetes lifestyle menu provided greater protein (91 g) than the regular (85 g) and diabetes high energy (88 g) menus (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and equivalent fibre (33 vs. 31 vs. 33 g, respectively). After implementation of the new menus, more patients reported that meals met their nutritional needs (19 [95%] vs. 14 [70%], <i>p</i> = 0.04), and more healthcare professionals reported menus for inpatients with diabetes were appropriate (16 [100%] vs. 11 [41%], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Using the diabetes lifestyle menu improved the macronutrient composition of meals for inpatients with diabetes not at risk of malnutrition.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved macronutrient composition of meals delivered to people with diabetes in hospital: a pre–post, mixed-methods observational study\",\"authors\":\"Emma Armstrong,&nbsp;Rahul D. Barmanray,&nbsp;Adamandia Kriketos,&nbsp;Bridget Agius,&nbsp;Aimee Dow,&nbsp;Hilda Griffin,&nbsp;Spiros Fourlanos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jhn.13375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Providing meals which meet diverse needs of hospital inpatients is complex, contributing to challenges in optimising glycaemia. We developed menus that improved the appropriateness of macronutrient composition of meals for inpatients with diabetes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative feedback from patients and healthcare professionals prompted the implementation of two new menus: ‘diabetes lifestyle’ and ‘diabetes high energy’. Quantitative nutrition analysis of meals provided to inpatients using new menus was compared to the regular menu. Qualitative surveys were repeated after the implementation of the new menus.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nutrition analysis demonstrated that meals ordered from the diabetes lifestyle menu (mean energy: 7.85 MJ) comprised less total fat (71 vs. 74 vs. 64 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), saturated fat (34 vs. 36 vs. 31 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), carbohydrate (246 vs. 249 vs. 217 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and sugar (125 vs. 121 vs. 102 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to the regular (mean energy: 8.46 MJ) and diabetes high energy menus (mean energy: 8.70 MJ). Meals ordered from the diabetes lifestyle menu provided greater protein (91 g) than the regular (85 g) and diabetes high energy (88 g) menus (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and equivalent fibre (33 vs. 31 vs. 33 g, respectively). After implementation of the new menus, more patients reported that meals met their nutritional needs (19 [95%] vs. 14 [70%], <i>p</i> = 0.04), and more healthcare professionals reported menus for inpatients with diabetes were appropriate (16 [100%] vs. 11 [41%], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using the diabetes lifestyle menu improved the macronutrient composition of meals for inpatients with diabetes not at risk of malnutrition.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为住院患者提供满足不同需求的膳食非常复杂,这也是优化血糖的挑战之一。我们制定了菜单,以改善糖尿病住院患者膳食中宏量营养素组成的适当性:方法:患者和医护人员的定性反馈促使我们实施了两种新菜单:"糖尿病生活方式 "和 "糖尿病高能量"。对使用新菜单的住院患者提供的膳食进行定量营养分析,并与常规菜单进行比较。实施新菜单后,再次进行了定性调查:营养分析表明,从糖尿病生活方式菜单(平均能量:7.85 兆焦)上订购的膳食总脂肪含量较低(71 克 vs. 74 克 vs. 64 克,p):对于没有营养不良风险的住院糖尿病患者而言,使用糖尿病生活方式菜单可改善膳食中的宏量营养素构成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved macronutrient composition of meals delivered to people with diabetes in hospital: a pre–post, mixed-methods observational study

Background

Providing meals which meet diverse needs of hospital inpatients is complex, contributing to challenges in optimising glycaemia. We developed menus that improved the appropriateness of macronutrient composition of meals for inpatients with diabetes.

Methods

Qualitative feedback from patients and healthcare professionals prompted the implementation of two new menus: ‘diabetes lifestyle’ and ‘diabetes high energy’. Quantitative nutrition analysis of meals provided to inpatients using new menus was compared to the regular menu. Qualitative surveys were repeated after the implementation of the new menus.

Results

Nutrition analysis demonstrated that meals ordered from the diabetes lifestyle menu (mean energy: 7.85 MJ) comprised less total fat (71 vs. 74 vs. 64 g, p < 0.001), saturated fat (34 vs. 36 vs. 31 g, p < 0.001), carbohydrate (246 vs. 249 vs. 217 g, p < 0.001) and sugar (125 vs. 121 vs. 102 g, p < 0.001) compared to the regular (mean energy: 8.46 MJ) and diabetes high energy menus (mean energy: 8.70 MJ). Meals ordered from the diabetes lifestyle menu provided greater protein (91 g) than the regular (85 g) and diabetes high energy (88 g) menus (p < 0.001) and equivalent fibre (33 vs. 31 vs. 33 g, respectively). After implementation of the new menus, more patients reported that meals met their nutritional needs (19 [95%] vs. 14 [70%], p = 0.04), and more healthcare professionals reported menus for inpatients with diabetes were appropriate (16 [100%] vs. 11 [41%], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Using the diabetes lifestyle menu improved the macronutrient composition of meals for inpatients with diabetes not at risk of malnutrition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
期刊最新文献
Choice on the menu: Increasing meal choice for people living in residential aged care, a pilot study Content accuracy and readability of dietary advice available on webpages: A systematic review of the evidence Issue Information Accuracy of reported energy in food and beverages supplied to hospital patients Consolidating the evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to promote vegetable intake in priority settings: An overview of systematic reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1