S Oubbéa, B Pilmis, D Seytre, A Lomont, T Billard-Pomares, J-R Zahar, L Foucault-Fruchard
{"title":"一个高发省份肺结核住院病人未隔离的风险因素:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"S Oubbéa, B Pilmis, D Seytre, A Lomont, T Billard-Pomares, J-R Zahar, L Foucault-Fruchard","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary tuberculosis (PT) is an airborne disease, justifying the identification of suspect patients on admission, and their hospitalization in individual rooms with the implementation of Airborne Supplementary Precautions (ASP). The aim of this study was to identify, in a high-prevalence hospital, the frequency of non-isolated PT and the factors associated with the delay in implementing ASP. This was a retrospective observational study, including patients with at least one Mycobacterium tuberculosis-positive specimen. Patient demographic and clinical data, as well as data related to the mode of admission, were collected. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. During the study period, 256 patients were included. Among them 134 (52.3%) had PT. These included 100 (75%) men, median age 39, 70% foreign-born. Among these patients, 46 (34%) were isolated beyond the 24th hour of admission. The average time to implement ASP was 4.3 days, and 7 patients (5.2%) were not isolated throughout their stay. Three classes of factors were associated by multivariate analysis with isolation. Previous consultation with a general practitioner was protective whereas admission through emergency department was not. Presence of so-called cardinal clinical signs and a suggestive chest X-ray were protective factors. Finally, European patients were less frequently isolated. In our study, 34% of patients admitted with PT were not isolated on admission. The risk of non-isolation was 3 times higher in cases of admission via the emergency department, and European patients were less well isolated. The presence of cardinal signs and prior consultation with a general practitioner were associated with a higher frequency of isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for non-isolation of patients admitted for pulmonary tuberculosis in a high-incidence département: a single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"S Oubbéa, B Pilmis, D Seytre, A Lomont, T Billard-Pomares, J-R Zahar, L Foucault-Fruchard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pulmonary tuberculosis (PT) is an airborne disease, justifying the identification of suspect patients on admission, and their hospitalization in individual rooms with the implementation of Airborne Supplementary Precautions (ASP). The aim of this study was to identify, in a high-prevalence hospital, the frequency of non-isolated PT and the factors associated with the delay in implementing ASP. This was a retrospective observational study, including patients with at least one Mycobacterium tuberculosis-positive specimen. Patient demographic and clinical data, as well as data related to the mode of admission, were collected. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. During the study period, 256 patients were included. Among them 134 (52.3%) had PT. These included 100 (75%) men, median age 39, 70% foreign-born. Among these patients, 46 (34%) were isolated beyond the 24th hour of admission. The average time to implement ASP was 4.3 days, and 7 patients (5.2%) were not isolated throughout their stay. Three classes of factors were associated by multivariate analysis with isolation. Previous consultation with a general practitioner was protective whereas admission through emergency department was not. Presence of so-called cardinal clinical signs and a suggestive chest X-ray were protective factors. Finally, European patients were less frequently isolated. In our study, 34% of patients admitted with PT were not isolated on admission. The risk of non-isolation was 3 times higher in cases of admission via the emergency department, and European patients were less well isolated. The presence of cardinal signs and prior consultation with a general practitioner were associated with a higher frequency of isolation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肺结核(PT)是一种通过空气传播的疾病,因此有理由在可疑患者入院时对其进行识别,并在其住院期间在单人病房实施空气传播补充预防措施(ASP)。本研究的目的是在一家高发病率医院中确定非隔离型肺结核的发病率以及与延迟实施 ASP 相关的因素。这是一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象包括至少有一份结核分枝杆菌阳性标本的患者。研究收集了患者的人口统计学和临床数据,以及与入院方式相关的数据。进行了单变量和多变量统计分析。在研究期间,共纳入了 256 名患者。其中 134 人(52.3%)患有 PT。其中包括 100 名(75%)男性,中位年龄为 39 岁,70% 在国外出生。在这些患者中,有 46 人(34%)在入院 24 小时后仍被隔离。实施 ASP 的平均时间为 4.3 天,有 7 名患者(5.2%)在整个住院期间未被隔离。通过多变量分析,有三类因素与隔离有关。曾向全科医生就诊具有保护作用,而通过急诊科入院则不具有保护作用。存在所谓的主要临床症状和胸部 X 光片提示也是保护因素。最后,欧洲病人较少被隔离。在我们的研究中,34% 的 PT 患者在入院时未被隔离。经急诊科入院的患者未被隔离的风险是经急诊科入院的患者的三倍,而欧裔患者的隔离率较低。出现主要体征和事先咨询全科医生与较高的隔离频率有关。
Risk factors for non-isolation of patients admitted for pulmonary tuberculosis in a high-incidence département: a single-center retrospective study.
Pulmonary tuberculosis (PT) is an airborne disease, justifying the identification of suspect patients on admission, and their hospitalization in individual rooms with the implementation of Airborne Supplementary Precautions (ASP). The aim of this study was to identify, in a high-prevalence hospital, the frequency of non-isolated PT and the factors associated with the delay in implementing ASP. This was a retrospective observational study, including patients with at least one Mycobacterium tuberculosis-positive specimen. Patient demographic and clinical data, as well as data related to the mode of admission, were collected. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. During the study period, 256 patients were included. Among them 134 (52.3%) had PT. These included 100 (75%) men, median age 39, 70% foreign-born. Among these patients, 46 (34%) were isolated beyond the 24th hour of admission. The average time to implement ASP was 4.3 days, and 7 patients (5.2%) were not isolated throughout their stay. Three classes of factors were associated by multivariate analysis with isolation. Previous consultation with a general practitioner was protective whereas admission through emergency department was not. Presence of so-called cardinal clinical signs and a suggestive chest X-ray were protective factors. Finally, European patients were less frequently isolated. In our study, 34% of patients admitted with PT were not isolated on admission. The risk of non-isolation was 3 times higher in cases of admission via the emergency department, and European patients were less well isolated. The presence of cardinal signs and prior consultation with a general practitioner were associated with a higher frequency of isolation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.