前交叉韧带重建术后恢复运动过程中的股四头肌力量测试实践与障碍:大学运动训练员调查。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Athletic Training Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24
Reagan Sellers, Kylie Brincks, Chris Kuenze, John Goetschius
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建术后恢复运动过程中的股四头肌力量测试实践与障碍:大学运动训练员调查。","authors":"Reagan Sellers, Kylie Brincks, Chris Kuenze, John Goetschius","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Quadriceps strength is a key outcome for guiding rehabilitation and return to sport-specific activities after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Describe the quadriceps strength testing practices and barriers college athletic trainers (ATs) are using and experiencing when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR. 2)Compare testing methods between college ATs working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting and other college settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>243 full-time collegiate ATs who had primarily overseen/directed an ACLR rehabilitation in the past five years (age: 34.8±10.7, years of AT practice: 11.7±9.3, NCAA division I setting: 56%).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Our survey included four sections: Demographics, General ACLR rehabilitation practices, Quadriceps strength testing methods & criteria, and Quadriceps strength testing barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knee muscle strength was the most common (98%) outcome collegiate ATs use when determining whether an ACLR patient is ready to progress to sport-specific activities. Manual muscle testing (MMT) was the most used testing method (57%), followed by isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) (48%), repetition max (RM) testing (35%) and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (22%). Most ATs (63-64%) used >90% side-to-side symmetry as their return to sport-specific activities criteria. Lack of equipment needed (83%), lack of financial means (28%), and lack of training/education (20%) were the barriers that most limited ATs use of IKD testing, the gold-standard testing method. Compared to ATs in other settings, a greater proportion of ATs working in the NCAA Division I setting used IKD testing (65% vs 28%) and a smaller proportion used MMT (47% vs 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While almost all college ATs considered knee muscle strength an important outcome to assess when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR, quadriceps strength testing practices were highly variable among ATs and may be impacted by access to necessary resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quadriceps Strength Testing Practices & Barriers During Return to Sport from ACL Reconstruction: A Survey of Collegiate Athletic Trainers.\",\"authors\":\"Reagan Sellers, Kylie Brincks, Chris Kuenze, John Goetschius\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Quadriceps strength is a key outcome for guiding rehabilitation and return to sport-specific activities after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Describe the quadriceps strength testing practices and barriers college athletic trainers (ATs) are using and experiencing when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR. 2)Compare testing methods between college ATs working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting and other college settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>243 full-time collegiate ATs who had primarily overseen/directed an ACLR rehabilitation in the past five years (age: 34.8±10.7, years of AT practice: 11.7±9.3, NCAA division I setting: 56%).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Our survey included four sections: Demographics, General ACLR rehabilitation practices, Quadriceps strength testing methods & criteria, and Quadriceps strength testing barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knee muscle strength was the most common (98%) outcome collegiate ATs use when determining whether an ACLR patient is ready to progress to sport-specific activities. Manual muscle testing (MMT) was the most used testing method (57%), followed by isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) (48%), repetition max (RM) testing (35%) and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (22%). Most ATs (63-64%) used >90% side-to-side symmetry as their return to sport-specific activities criteria. Lack of equipment needed (83%), lack of financial means (28%), and lack of training/education (20%) were the barriers that most limited ATs use of IKD testing, the gold-standard testing method. Compared to ATs in other settings, a greater proportion of ATs working in the NCAA Division I setting used IKD testing (65% vs 28%) and a smaller proportion used MMT (47% vs 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While almost all college ATs considered knee muscle strength an important outcome to assess when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR, quadriceps strength testing practices were highly variable among ATs and may be impacted by access to necessary resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:股四头肌力量是指导前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后康复和恢复特定运动的关键结果:1)描述大学运动训练员(ATs)在使前交叉韧带重建术后患者恢复特定运动时使用的股四头肌力量测试方法和遇到的障碍。2)比较在全美大学生体育协会(NCAA)第一分部和其他大学环境中工作的大学运动训练员的测试方法:设计:横断面:患者或其他参与者:243 名全职大学助产士,他们在过去五年中主要负责监督/指导 ACLR 康复(年龄:34.8±10.7,助产士执业年限:11.7±9.3,NCAA I 级环境,56%):主要结果:我们的调查包括四个部分:主要结果:我们的调查包括四个部分:人口统计学、一般 ACLR 康复实践、股四头肌力量测试方法和标准以及股四头肌力量测试障碍:膝关节肌力是大学助产士在判断前交叉韧带损伤患者是否准备好进行特定运动时最常用的结果(98%)。手动肌肉测试(MMT)是最常用的测试方法(57%),其次是等动测力法(IKD)(48%)、最大重复次数(RM)测试(35%)和手持式测力法(HHD)(22%)。大多数 ATs(63-64%)将 >90% 的侧对侧对称性作为恢复特定运动活动的标准。缺乏所需的设备(83%)、缺乏经济能力(28%)和缺乏培训/教育(20%)是限制康复治疗师使用 IKD 测试这一黄金标准测试方法的最大障碍。与其他环境下的助产士相比,在NCAA Division I环境下工作的助产士使用IKD测试的比例更高(65% vs 28%),而使用MMT的比例较低(47% vs 70%):尽管几乎所有的大学助产士都认为膝关节肌力是前交叉韧带重建术后患者恢复特定运动时需要评估的重要结果,但助产士之间的股四头肌肌力测试方法差异很大,而且可能会受到获得必要资源的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quadriceps Strength Testing Practices & Barriers During Return to Sport from ACL Reconstruction: A Survey of Collegiate Athletic Trainers.

Context: Quadriceps strength is a key outcome for guiding rehabilitation and return to sport-specific activities after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.

Objectives: 1) Describe the quadriceps strength testing practices and barriers college athletic trainers (ATs) are using and experiencing when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR. 2)Compare testing methods between college ATs working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting and other college settings.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Online survey.

Patients or other participants: 243 full-time collegiate ATs who had primarily overseen/directed an ACLR rehabilitation in the past five years (age: 34.8±10.7, years of AT practice: 11.7±9.3, NCAA division I setting: 56%).

Main outcomes: Our survey included four sections: Demographics, General ACLR rehabilitation practices, Quadriceps strength testing methods & criteria, and Quadriceps strength testing barriers.

Results: Knee muscle strength was the most common (98%) outcome collegiate ATs use when determining whether an ACLR patient is ready to progress to sport-specific activities. Manual muscle testing (MMT) was the most used testing method (57%), followed by isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) (48%), repetition max (RM) testing (35%) and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (22%). Most ATs (63-64%) used >90% side-to-side symmetry as their return to sport-specific activities criteria. Lack of equipment needed (83%), lack of financial means (28%), and lack of training/education (20%) were the barriers that most limited ATs use of IKD testing, the gold-standard testing method. Compared to ATs in other settings, a greater proportion of ATs working in the NCAA Division I setting used IKD testing (65% vs 28%) and a smaller proportion used MMT (47% vs 70%).

Conclusions: While almost all college ATs considered knee muscle strength an important outcome to assess when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR, quadriceps strength testing practices were highly variable among ATs and may be impacted by access to necessary resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
期刊最新文献
Cortical Changes of Dual Cognitive-Task Balance Training in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Trial. Influence of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury and Ankle Anterior Displacement on Symptoms in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability. People With Patellofemoral Pain Have Bilateral Deficits in Physical Performance Regardless of Pain Laterality. Prediction of Recurrent Lateral Ankle Sprain and Ankle Pain Using Applied Care Strategies and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Single-Leg Hop Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Ready for Landing but Cleared for Take-Off?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1