Reagan Sellers, Kylie Brincks, Chris Kuenze, John Goetschius
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建术后恢复运动过程中的股四头肌力量测试实践与障碍:大学运动训练员调查。","authors":"Reagan Sellers, Kylie Brincks, Chris Kuenze, John Goetschius","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Quadriceps strength is a key outcome for guiding rehabilitation and return to sport-specific activities after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Describe the quadriceps strength testing practices and barriers college athletic trainers (ATs) are using and experiencing when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR. 2)Compare testing methods between college ATs working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting and other college settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>243 full-time collegiate ATs who had primarily overseen/directed an ACLR rehabilitation in the past five years (age: 34.8±10.7, years of AT practice: 11.7±9.3, NCAA division I setting: 56%).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Our survey included four sections: Demographics, General ACLR rehabilitation practices, Quadriceps strength testing methods & criteria, and Quadriceps strength testing barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knee muscle strength was the most common (98%) outcome collegiate ATs use when determining whether an ACLR patient is ready to progress to sport-specific activities. Manual muscle testing (MMT) was the most used testing method (57%), followed by isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) (48%), repetition max (RM) testing (35%) and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (22%). Most ATs (63-64%) used >90% side-to-side symmetry as their return to sport-specific activities criteria. Lack of equipment needed (83%), lack of financial means (28%), and lack of training/education (20%) were the barriers that most limited ATs use of IKD testing, the gold-standard testing method. Compared to ATs in other settings, a greater proportion of ATs working in the NCAA Division I setting used IKD testing (65% vs 28%) and a smaller proportion used MMT (47% vs 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While almost all college ATs considered knee muscle strength an important outcome to assess when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR, quadriceps strength testing practices were highly variable among ATs and may be impacted by access to necessary resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quadriceps Strength Testing Practices & Barriers During Return to Sport from ACL Reconstruction: A Survey of Collegiate Athletic Trainers.\",\"authors\":\"Reagan Sellers, Kylie Brincks, Chris Kuenze, John Goetschius\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Quadriceps strength is a key outcome for guiding rehabilitation and return to sport-specific activities after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Describe the quadriceps strength testing practices and barriers college athletic trainers (ATs) are using and experiencing when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR. 2)Compare testing methods between college ATs working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting and other college settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>243 full-time collegiate ATs who had primarily overseen/directed an ACLR rehabilitation in the past five years (age: 34.8±10.7, years of AT practice: 11.7±9.3, NCAA division I setting: 56%).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Our survey included four sections: Demographics, General ACLR rehabilitation practices, Quadriceps strength testing methods & criteria, and Quadriceps strength testing barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knee muscle strength was the most common (98%) outcome collegiate ATs use when determining whether an ACLR patient is ready to progress to sport-specific activities. Manual muscle testing (MMT) was the most used testing method (57%), followed by isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) (48%), repetition max (RM) testing (35%) and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (22%). Most ATs (63-64%) used >90% side-to-side symmetry as their return to sport-specific activities criteria. Lack of equipment needed (83%), lack of financial means (28%), and lack of training/education (20%) were the barriers that most limited ATs use of IKD testing, the gold-standard testing method. Compared to ATs in other settings, a greater proportion of ATs working in the NCAA Division I setting used IKD testing (65% vs 28%) and a smaller proportion used MMT (47% vs 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While almost all college ATs considered knee muscle strength an important outcome to assess when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR, quadriceps strength testing practices were highly variable among ATs and may be impacted by access to necessary resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0378.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:股四头肌力量是指导前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后康复和恢复特定运动的关键结果:1)描述大学运动训练员(ATs)在使前交叉韧带重建术后患者恢复特定运动时使用的股四头肌力量测试方法和遇到的障碍。2)比较在全美大学生体育协会(NCAA)第一分部和其他大学环境中工作的大学运动训练员的测试方法:设计:横断面:患者或其他参与者:243 名全职大学助产士,他们在过去五年中主要负责监督/指导 ACLR 康复(年龄:34.8±10.7,助产士执业年限:11.7±9.3,NCAA I 级环境,56%):主要结果:我们的调查包括四个部分:主要结果:我们的调查包括四个部分:人口统计学、一般 ACLR 康复实践、股四头肌力量测试方法和标准以及股四头肌力量测试障碍:膝关节肌力是大学助产士在判断前交叉韧带损伤患者是否准备好进行特定运动时最常用的结果(98%)。手动肌肉测试(MMT)是最常用的测试方法(57%),其次是等动测力法(IKD)(48%)、最大重复次数(RM)测试(35%)和手持式测力法(HHD)(22%)。大多数 ATs(63-64%)将 >90% 的侧对侧对称性作为恢复特定运动活动的标准。缺乏所需的设备(83%)、缺乏经济能力(28%)和缺乏培训/教育(20%)是限制康复治疗师使用 IKD 测试这一黄金标准测试方法的最大障碍。与其他环境下的助产士相比,在NCAA Division I环境下工作的助产士使用IKD测试的比例更高(65% vs 28%),而使用MMT的比例较低(47% vs 70%):尽管几乎所有的大学助产士都认为膝关节肌力是前交叉韧带重建术后患者恢复特定运动时需要评估的重要结果,但助产士之间的股四头肌肌力测试方法差异很大,而且可能会受到获得必要资源的影响。
Quadriceps Strength Testing Practices & Barriers During Return to Sport from ACL Reconstruction: A Survey of Collegiate Athletic Trainers.
Context: Quadriceps strength is a key outcome for guiding rehabilitation and return to sport-specific activities after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.
Objectives: 1) Describe the quadriceps strength testing practices and barriers college athletic trainers (ATs) are using and experiencing when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR. 2)Compare testing methods between college ATs working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I setting and other college settings.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Setting: Online survey.
Patients or other participants: 243 full-time collegiate ATs who had primarily overseen/directed an ACLR rehabilitation in the past five years (age: 34.8±10.7, years of AT practice: 11.7±9.3, NCAA division I setting: 56%).
Main outcomes: Our survey included four sections: Demographics, General ACLR rehabilitation practices, Quadriceps strength testing methods & criteria, and Quadriceps strength testing barriers.
Results: Knee muscle strength was the most common (98%) outcome collegiate ATs use when determining whether an ACLR patient is ready to progress to sport-specific activities. Manual muscle testing (MMT) was the most used testing method (57%), followed by isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) (48%), repetition max (RM) testing (35%) and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (22%). Most ATs (63-64%) used >90% side-to-side symmetry as their return to sport-specific activities criteria. Lack of equipment needed (83%), lack of financial means (28%), and lack of training/education (20%) were the barriers that most limited ATs use of IKD testing, the gold-standard testing method. Compared to ATs in other settings, a greater proportion of ATs working in the NCAA Division I setting used IKD testing (65% vs 28%) and a smaller proportion used MMT (47% vs 70%).
Conclusions: While almost all college ATs considered knee muscle strength an important outcome to assess when returning patients to sport-specific activities after ACLR, quadriceps strength testing practices were highly variable among ATs and may be impacted by access to necessary resources.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries.
The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.