Ahmad Mustafa, Chapman Wei, Radu Grovu, Craig Basman, Arber Kodra, Gregory Maniatis, Bruce Rutkin, Mitchell Weinberg, Chad Kliger
{"title":"使用新型机器学习工具预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的最佳出院时间。","authors":"Ahmad Mustafa, Chapman Wei, Radu Grovu, Craig Basman, Arber Kodra, Gregory Maniatis, Bruce Rutkin, Mitchell Weinberg, Chad Kliger","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement, it requires extensive healthcare resources, and optimal length of hospital stay has become increasingly important. This study was conducted to assess the potential of novel machine learning models (artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost) in predicting optimal hospital discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models can be used to accurately predict optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample database using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on length of hospital stay: optimal discharge (length of hospital stay 0-3 days); and late discharge (length of hospital stay 4-9 days). χ<sup>2</sup> and t tests were performed to compare patient characteristics with optimal discharge and prolonged discharge. Logistic regression, artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models were used to predict optimal discharge. Model performance was determined using area under the curve and F1 score. An area under the curve≥0.80 and an F1 score≥0.70 were considered strong predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five thousand and eight hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement were analysed. Predictability of optimal discharge was similar amongst the models (area under the curve 0.80 in all models). In all models, patient disposition and elective procedure were the most important predictive factors. Coagulation disorder was the strongest co-morbidity predictor of whether a patient had an optimal discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models had satisfactory performances, demonstrating similar accuracy to binary logistic regression in predicting optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Further validation and refinement of these models may lead to broader clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using novel machine learning tools to predict optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Mustafa, Chapman Wei, Radu Grovu, Craig Basman, Arber Kodra, Gregory Maniatis, Bruce Rutkin, Mitchell Weinberg, Chad Kliger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement, it requires extensive healthcare resources, and optimal length of hospital stay has become increasingly important. This study was conducted to assess the potential of novel machine learning models (artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost) in predicting optimal hospital discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models can be used to accurately predict optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample database using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on length of hospital stay: optimal discharge (length of hospital stay 0-3 days); and late discharge (length of hospital stay 4-9 days). χ<sup>2</sup> and t tests were performed to compare patient characteristics with optimal discharge and prolonged discharge. Logistic regression, artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models were used to predict optimal discharge. Model performance was determined using area under the curve and F1 score. An area under the curve≥0.80 and an F1 score≥0.70 were considered strong predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five thousand and eight hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement were analysed. Predictability of optimal discharge was similar amongst the models (area under the curve 0.80 in all models). In all models, patient disposition and elective procedure were the most important predictive factors. Coagulation disorder was the strongest co-morbidity predictor of whether a patient had an optimal discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models had satisfactory performances, demonstrating similar accuracy to binary logistic regression in predicting optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Further validation and refinement of these models may lead to broader clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2024.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2024.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using novel machine learning tools to predict optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Background: Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement, it requires extensive healthcare resources, and optimal length of hospital stay has become increasingly important. This study was conducted to assess the potential of novel machine learning models (artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost) in predicting optimal hospital discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Aim: To determine whether artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models can be used to accurately predict optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Methods: Data were collected from the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample database using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on length of hospital stay: optimal discharge (length of hospital stay 0-3 days); and late discharge (length of hospital stay 4-9 days). χ2 and t tests were performed to compare patient characteristics with optimal discharge and prolonged discharge. Logistic regression, artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models were used to predict optimal discharge. Model performance was determined using area under the curve and F1 score. An area under the curve≥0.80 and an F1 score≥0.70 were considered strong predictive accuracy.
Results: Twenty-five thousand and eight hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement were analysed. Predictability of optimal discharge was similar amongst the models (area under the curve 0.80 in all models). In all models, patient disposition and elective procedure were the most important predictive factors. Coagulation disorder was the strongest co-morbidity predictor of whether a patient had an optimal discharge.
Conclusions: Artificial neural network and eXtreme Gradient Boost models had satisfactory performances, demonstrating similar accuracy to binary logistic regression in predicting optimal discharge following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Further validation and refinement of these models may lead to broader clinical adoption.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.