评估植入等焦距人工晶体后的视觉效果、术后角膜α和角膜κ。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S478471
Ahmed Hassan Assaf, Hams Samy, Noha Fawky, Menna Ahmed Kamel
{"title":"评估植入等焦距人工晶体后的视觉效果、术后角膜α和角膜κ。","authors":"Ahmed Hassan Assaf, Hams Samy, Noha Fawky, Menna Ahmed Kamel","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S478471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of angles kappa and alpha on the visual outcomes after implantation of isofocal intraocular lens (IOL) during cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study involved 66 eyes undergoing cataract surgery with Isopure IOLs. Exclusion criteria comprised irregular corneal astigmatism exceeding 1.0D, and ocular co-morbidities affecting visual outcomes post-surgery. Evaluation parameters included postoperative refraction, uncorrected and corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 80 cm. Additionally, postoperative angles alpha, kappa, and wavefront aberrations at a 3-mm pupil using ray tracing were assessed post-surgery at least 60 days later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a mean age of 64.48 ± 9.92 years. Mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.21 ± 0.27 D. Mean UDVA and CDVA were LogMAR 0.06 ± 0.04 and 0.02 ± 0.06, respectively. Mean UIVA LogMAR 0.32 ± 0.08 while mean DCIVA was LogMAR 0.29 ± 0.08. Postoperative angles kappa and alpha were 0.39 ± 0.14 mm and 0.45 ± 0.15 mm, respectively. Mean postoperative ocular RMS higher-order aberrations (HOAs) 0.23 ± 0.08. Spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil averaged 0.05 ± 0.07, 0.12 ± 0.03, and 0.07 ± 0.03, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between postoperative angle kappa and alpha with UDVA, CDVA, or HOAs. A non-significant weak positive correlation was noted between angle kappa and UIVA/DCIVA, while no correlation was found between angle alpha and UIVA/DCIVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No substantial correlations were found between various postoperative angles kappa and alpha values and postoperative visual acuity metrics (UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, and DCIVA) or higher order ocular aberrations (including, spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil with a 3.0 mm diameter) in pseudophakic eyes implanted with isofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Visual Outcomes, Postoperative Angle Alpha, and Angle Kappa After Implantation of Isofocal Intraocular Lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Hassan Assaf, Hams Samy, Noha Fawky, Menna Ahmed Kamel\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S478471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of angles kappa and alpha on the visual outcomes after implantation of isofocal intraocular lens (IOL) during cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study involved 66 eyes undergoing cataract surgery with Isopure IOLs. Exclusion criteria comprised irregular corneal astigmatism exceeding 1.0D, and ocular co-morbidities affecting visual outcomes post-surgery. Evaluation parameters included postoperative refraction, uncorrected and corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 80 cm. Additionally, postoperative angles alpha, kappa, and wavefront aberrations at a 3-mm pupil using ray tracing were assessed post-surgery at least 60 days later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a mean age of 64.48 ± 9.92 years. Mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.21 ± 0.27 D. Mean UDVA and CDVA were LogMAR 0.06 ± 0.04 and 0.02 ± 0.06, respectively. Mean UIVA LogMAR 0.32 ± 0.08 while mean DCIVA was LogMAR 0.29 ± 0.08. Postoperative angles kappa and alpha were 0.39 ± 0.14 mm and 0.45 ± 0.15 mm, respectively. Mean postoperative ocular RMS higher-order aberrations (HOAs) 0.23 ± 0.08. Spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil averaged 0.05 ± 0.07, 0.12 ± 0.03, and 0.07 ± 0.03, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between postoperative angle kappa and alpha with UDVA, CDVA, or HOAs. A non-significant weak positive correlation was noted between angle kappa and UIVA/DCIVA, while no correlation was found between angle alpha and UIVA/DCIVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No substantial correlations were found between various postoperative angles kappa and alpha values and postoperative visual acuity metrics (UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, and DCIVA) or higher order ocular aberrations (including, spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil with a 3.0 mm diameter) in pseudophakic eyes implanted with isofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480658/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S478471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S478471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估在白内障手术中植入等焦距人工晶体(IOL)后,角膜κ和α对视觉效果的影响:这项前瞻性研究涉及 66 只接受白内障手术并植入等焦人工晶体的眼睛。排除标准包括不规则角膜散光超过 1.0D,以及影响术后视觉效果的眼部并发症。评估参数包括术后屈光度、未矫正和矫正的远距离视力(UDVA、CDVA)、未矫正的中间视力(UIVA)以及 80 厘米处的远距离矫正中间视力(DCIVA)。此外,术后至少 60 天后,使用光线跟踪法对术后α角、κ角和 3 毫米瞳孔处的波前像差进行评估:患者的平均年龄为 64.48±9.92 岁。平均 UDVA 和 CDVA 的 LogMAR 分别为 0.06 ± 0.04 和 0.02 ± 0.06。平均 UIVA 的 LogMAR 为 0.32 ± 0.08,而平均 DCIVA 的 LogMAR 为 0.29 ± 0.08。术后角膜卡帕和阿尔法分别为 0.39 ± 0.14 毫米和 0.45 ± 0.15 毫米。术后眼部 RMS 高阶像差(HOA)平均值为 0.23 ± 0.08。球差、彗差和三叶差的平均值分别为 0.05 ± 0.07、0.12 ± 0.03 和 0.07 ± 0.03。术后角膜卡帕和α与UDVA、CDVA或HOA之间没有明显的相关性。角膜卡帕与 UIVA/DCIVA 之间存在非显著的弱正相关性,而角膜α与 UIVA/DCIVA 之间则没有相关性:结论:在植入等焦距眼内人工晶体(IOL)的假性散光眼中,各种术后角膜卡帕值和α值与术后视力指标(UDVA、CDVA、UIVA 和 DCIVA)或高阶眼像差(包括球差、昏迷和直径为 3.0 mm 的三叶形)之间没有发现实质性的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Visual Outcomes, Postoperative Angle Alpha, and Angle Kappa After Implantation of Isofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of angles kappa and alpha on the visual outcomes after implantation of isofocal intraocular lens (IOL) during cataract surgery.

Methods: This prospective study involved 66 eyes undergoing cataract surgery with Isopure IOLs. Exclusion criteria comprised irregular corneal astigmatism exceeding 1.0D, and ocular co-morbidities affecting visual outcomes post-surgery. Evaluation parameters included postoperative refraction, uncorrected and corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 80 cm. Additionally, postoperative angles alpha, kappa, and wavefront aberrations at a 3-mm pupil using ray tracing were assessed post-surgery at least 60 days later.

Results: Patients had a mean age of 64.48 ± 9.92 years. Mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.21 ± 0.27 D. Mean UDVA and CDVA were LogMAR 0.06 ± 0.04 and 0.02 ± 0.06, respectively. Mean UIVA LogMAR 0.32 ± 0.08 while mean DCIVA was LogMAR 0.29 ± 0.08. Postoperative angles kappa and alpha were 0.39 ± 0.14 mm and 0.45 ± 0.15 mm, respectively. Mean postoperative ocular RMS higher-order aberrations (HOAs) 0.23 ± 0.08. Spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil averaged 0.05 ± 0.07, 0.12 ± 0.03, and 0.07 ± 0.03, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between postoperative angle kappa and alpha with UDVA, CDVA, or HOAs. A non-significant weak positive correlation was noted between angle kappa and UIVA/DCIVA, while no correlation was found between angle alpha and UIVA/DCIVA.

Conclusion: No substantial correlations were found between various postoperative angles kappa and alpha values and postoperative visual acuity metrics (UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, and DCIVA) or higher order ocular aberrations (including, spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil with a 3.0 mm diameter) in pseudophakic eyes implanted with isofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Particulate Matter Pollutants and Ophthalmology Visits for Ocular Surface Irritation and Allergy. The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract. Comparison of Large Language Models in Diagnosis and Management of Challenging Clinical Cases. Enhancing OCT Reliability: The Role of Eye-Tracking in Achieving Consistent Retinal Measurements [Letter]. Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Seen Through the Free Diabetes Screening (FDS) Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1